Skip to main content

In the first debate of the Massachusetts Senate race, challenger Elizabeth Warren and Sen. Scott Brown faced off over the issues that are playing out nationally in this election, mostly on Warren's ground: income inequality, tax fairness, and who would really stand up for people of Massachusetts. But here's what the first debate boiled down to:

Warren wants voters to see Brown as a member of the Republican team: Brown wants voters to see Warren as a radical. #masen
@MonicaBPotts via TweetDeck
On that simple point, Brown failed, Warren scored. Brown had the disadvantage in this case of having a voting record to defend, and frequently lie about. He touted his record of being the "second most bipartisan senator" about half a dozen times, failing to mention that many of the issues on which he was definitely partisan were some of the biggest to face the Senate. But the constant line of attack from Warren on his voting record put Brown in a defensive, sometimes frantic-sounding response mode, overly aggressive and sometimes desperate sounding, responding with disjointed word salad.

Once the obligatory softball to Brown on the issue of "character," which gave him the opportunity to once again drag out the issue of Warren's heritage, was dispensed with (Warren: "Asked and answered. The Senator just doesn't like the answer"), the debate got down to the key issues. First up was how each of them would create jobs in Massachusetts. Warren stressed both short- and long-term plans, to both get people to work immediately and to "leveling the playing field so that small businesses can compete." Then she pointed to the three separate jobs bills that Brown had voted with Republicans to block, including the American Jobs Act, and two bills to put teachers and first responders back to work, and a bill to create construction and infrastructure jobs. Brown answered with more word salad, answering that he had been working on jobs and "she wants to raise your taxes!"

The issue of taxes was where Warren scored the most direct hits, repeatedly pointing out that Brown, just last week, had said he had made it "crystal clear" that he would work with the Republicans to hold middle class tax cuts hostage to protect the top two percent. Brown was reduced to repeated invocation of the "jobs creators" standing by his protection of the top two percent. Likewise, Warren effectively hit him on his votes to protect subsidies to big oil and millionaires and billionaires. Brown's responses on the taxes was, again, clear:  “I’m going to fight for every taxpayer. So once again, her criticism of me is that I’m not going to raise taxes, and that’s an accurate criticism.”

Asked about the fiscal cliff, Warren had a detailed approach with cuts to agriculture subsidies and defense, ending the war in Afghanistan and raising taxes on the wealthy and corporations, and including ending the subsidies to big oil. Brown was left to nothing more than his trusty "bipartisan" card, “The only way we’re going to get this done is to actually work together in a truly bipartisan manner.”

But it was on the last few questions that Warren really laid out what this election is about: on the Supreme Court, protecting women's rights, and climate change. Warren rejected the idea that demanding a Supreme Court nominee who saw Roe v. Wade as settled law was a litmus test, then turned the question to Brown's vote against Elena Kagan, pointing out that he stood with Republicans to block a qualified nominee. Brown answered with a lot about the women in his house and how he'd always fought, leading to this exchange:

Warren: “I guess the way I see this is the women in Massachusetts deserve a senator they can count on not some of the time, but a senator they can count on all of the time."

Brown: “You should stop scaring women, professor. Because I’ve been fighting for women since I was six years old. I’m going to fight for the rights of Catholics to practice their faith. I’m not going to pit women against their church and their faith. I want to have people to have contraceptive care.”

Goal Thermometer

Finally, on a question about climate change, Warren hit pay dirt. Brown said, yes, he does believe in climate change and then launched into a stream of phrases about an all-of-the-above approach, Keystone pipelines (lying about the number of jobs it would create) and how much he was like Ted Kennedy on energy. Warren, cogently, pointed out that Brown is "about a rigged playing field" in which "clean energy has to fight against oil companies and that tilts the balance."

Then she pointed out that Scott Brown has been fundraising around the country specifically on the point that he would be part of the Republican team obstructing Obama, that he would be a Republican team player. She used the example of climate change to point out that the radical Sen. Jim Inhofe, who calls climate change a hoax, would be in charge of overseeing the EPA if Republicans were in control. "This is a race for the control of the senate," she said. "This matters in this race, because it is about the control of Senate."

Please donate $3 to Elizabeth Warren on ActBlue.

6:08 PM PT: Says a lot:

Eliz Warren met the posT-debate scrum. Brown sent his campaign mgr. #masen #2012unfiltered
@ktumulty via Instagram

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Thu Sep 20, 2012 at 05:49 PM PDT.

Also republished by Massachusetts Kosmopolitans.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site