Skip to main content

Cain told members of the media after the speech that Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney's recent “47 percent” comment was a “non-story” being blown out of proportion by the media. But Cain said he would have been doing better if he was the nominee, saying that he'd probably have a “substantial lead” on President Barack Obama at this point.

“The reason is quite simple: I have some depth to my ideas,” he said.

Gainesville Sun

There is so much wrong in that blockquote that I scarcely know where to begin describing the wrong.

Let's start from the bottom and work our way up.

  • "I have some depth to my ideas." That is, technically, true. One does not normally measure depth in picometers, but natheless, a picometer of depth is still "some". Was there ever a more ludicrous plan than "9-9-9"? Even Steve Forbes' rich-guy fantasy of the flat tax was better thought out.
  • Herman Cain would have a "substantial lead" over Barack Obama. I will admit that you can sing better than Willard does. But that would not be enough to close your probable 80% deficit in the women's vote. In case no one told you, Herminator, even Republican women think you are skeevy.
  • 47% is being blown out of proportion by the media? Said one out-of-touch entitled CEO in defense of another.

Tim Pawlenty, Jon Huntsman, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum - the list of former rivals who have left a calling card shaped like a dagger in Romney's back is getting longer. Who will be the last to elicit "et tu?" from a shocked Mitt? Which Republican will stick with Mitt? I'll guess Newt. Of all of them, he's the one whose soul is available at the lowest bid.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site