Skip to main content

That's the equivalent of what "nice guy" Scott Brown said about Elizabeth Warren last night in response to the question "Is your opponent's character an issue in this election?":

I think what you're referring to was that Professor Warren claimed that she -- was a Native American, a person of color.  As you can see she's not.
Dr. King said that we should not be judged by the color of our skin but by the content of our character.  So here is Scott Brown, casting aspersions on Elizabeth Warren's character by pointing to the color of her skin.

The more I think and write about this, the more racist that statement seems to me.  How the f*&k can Scott Brown know whether Elizabeth Warren is part Native-American at all?  Has he conducted a geneological study to find that out?  Has he spoken to her relatives?  Has he dug into birth and death records in Oklahoma?  Has he plunged into  Would even all of those be conclusive?  More likely, he (or his staff) have culled Boston Herald, Drudge and other right wing sources for the charge.

The idea that you do or don't "look" Native-American, or Jewish, or Irish, or African-American and should have your character judged in any way by that is racist at heart.

I wrote earlier today that Brown had executed a half-Lazio, referring to the moment in the Rick Lazio-Hillary Clinton 2000 Senate debate in which Lazio walked over to Clinton, demanding that she sign a "pledge" and stuck it in her face.  Lazio's career tanked at that moment.  Let us hope the same happens to "nice-guy" Brown.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site