Skip to main content

"Moderate" Republican Lindsay Graham:

"There's a reason no president has ever been reelected with an economy like this," Graham said. "It would tell me that it's more of a demographic race for president than it is a performance-based race. And that may be where we're at as a nation, and maybe where we are as a party, and we just don't know it."
Thank you, Lindsay for that ignorant and racist statement. Let's look at it closely.

Graham is essentially saying that whites vote based on performance on the economy, but minorities don't, i.e., if only whites were still a greater majority, they would be sensible enough to vote based on performance.

Let's look closely at Graham's Racist and Poorly Informed Fallacies:

1.  "Whites" vote on "performance." Remember those buses filled with anti-gay marriage church members pulling up to the polls in 2004.  Were they voting for "performance" on the economy? Were Bush 2000 voters voting for performance on the (booming) economy?  Is it possible, Lindsay, that "minorities" this year rationally perceive that a Republican administration will be terrible for them economically?

2.  Obama's "performance" on the economy is the only economic issue this year:  The Republican platform this year can be translated as "We're Going to Screw You. Vote for Us." They are openly proposing gutting and voucherizing Medicare, (a little less openly) privatizing social security, and passing massive tax cuts for the wealthy.  The public (whites included), are finally realizing that Republicans want to screw them (unlike in 2010, when the R's succeeded in making the D's a threat to Medicare).

3.  Obama's "performance" has been terrible ("No President" has been elected with this performance.):  This is a pernicious theme because it is also the "Chuck Todd/Mark Halperin/esteemed political scientist" CW.  Unlike Graham and those VSP's, voters remember how terrible the economy was in 2008, and still blame Bush for it.

The "Great Recession" was the greatest economic disaster for this country since the 1930's Depression.  Therefore, the only really comparable year is 1936, when FDR managed to get elected in a landslide even though unemployment "only" dropped from 23.6% in 1932 to 16.9% in 1936. Similarly, unemployment has dropped from a high of 10% at the peak of the recession to the current 8.1%, and jobs have grown by millions since that peak.

So Lindsay, stop pretending to be a "moderate."  Scratch the surface and you're as racist and dumb as your SC colleague Jim DeMint.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site