Skip to main content

I have been lurking on this site for many years, always thinking that I should sign up but never following through.  What put me over the edge was this statement from Mitt Romney in his acceptance speech:

First, by 2020, North America will be energy independent by taking full advantage of our oil and coal and gas and nuclear and renewables.
If such an attitude was taken in 1970, our standard of living would be nowhere near where it is today.  For Mitt to completley ignore the most cost-effective way to meet our energy needs is telling.

Funding energy efficiency programs is the ideal way to move toward the goals most progressive support.

Income inequality
Unlike supply side investments (including those in renewable sources), energy efficiency measures disproportionately help low-income families.  Although low-income families use significantly less energy than middle and upper income households, it represents a strikingly large percentage of their disposable income.  Utility bills are the most commonly delinquent items, and delinquencies often occur concurrently with other shortages.  This indicates that a reduction in energy expenditures would be applied to other needed items.

While renewable energy is an important component in the fight against climate change, it does not reduce the cost per unit of energy.  More affluent households won't be affected by a small increase in cost per kWh, but low-income households will.

More jobs are created for each dollar invested in energy efficiency than almost any other public investment.  This is particularly true of “market transformation” activities.  EE programs help new technologies overcome the hurdle of initial high costs.  Often, suppliers and retailers don’t stock efficient products because they fear no one can afford them or will buy them.  Lowering the cost for first adopters allows retailers and suppliers to order larger quantities with confidence.  In some period of time the “market moves” and the incentives are no longer needed.  But the employees are still making the product – they may even be exporting it to other countries.
Real wealth is created
Capital is not the only form of wealth.  Computers are a good example of this.  The cost of getting information has been vastly lowered via the internet.  Even the wealthiest person in America in 1970 did not have instant access to any song he wanted to listen to that moment, no matter how many dollars he had in the bank.

If average new car MPG had not increaed since 1975, the average American would have to spend $1,750 more per year to drive 13,476 miles (the average usage for an Amoerican drive in 2011 per the EPA's 2011 Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Fuel Economy Trends Report Main Report Tables).  That is a whopping $350 billion dollars, assuming 175 million drivers.  Of course, that estimate would have to be adjusted a little - people would drive fewer miles, but gas would be more expensive.  But overall, the annual benefit is well into the $100's billion.  Further, the bulk of the costs of increased fuel efficiency aren't really costs at all - labor expenses for R&D and manufacturing go right back into the U.S. economy, unlike fossil fuels.

Visibilty of EE measures

While I realize that Energy Efficiency is not as "sexy" as solar or wind power, I feel that it should have a more prominent place in the progressive agenda.


Originally posted to AdirondackForeverWild on Thu Sep 27, 2012 at 07:10 AM PDT.

Also republished by Kosowatt.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (10+ / 0-)

    No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little. - Edmund Burke

    by AdirondackForeverWild on Thu Sep 27, 2012 at 07:10:37 AM PDT

  •  Efficiency is the cheapest energy 'source' (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    We need more programs like this:

    Starting Monday, and for a limited time only, Chapel Hill homeowners are eligible to receive up to $2,350 toward the cost of qualified home energy upgrades. This offer is available to the next 100 participating homeowners who secure a WISE project commitment by Jan. 1, 2013.

    Program participation gives qualified Chapel Hill homeowners access to a comprehensive home energy assessment; up to $2,000 toward the cost of home energy upgrades; a network of prequalified home performance contractors; special WISE financing offers; and third-party quality assurance. As an added incentive, homeowners eligible for this promotion may also receive $350 to offset the cost of the initial home energy assessment.

    The WISE (Worthwhile Investments Save Energy) program incubates and expands building energy efficiency programs across the Southeast, leveraging a $20 million investment from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Better Buildings Neighborhood Program.

    Read more: The Herald-Sun - Chapel Hill WISE announces 100 homes in 100 days promotion

    So far the program has resulted in average savings of $400 per year per home (just 6 years to break-even), plus air quality benefits from lower energy usage.

    NC-4 (soon to be NC-6) Obama/Biden 2012

    by bear83 on Thu Sep 27, 2012 at 07:44:44 AM PDT

  •  Not always the cheapest, but the greenest (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    As someone in the renewable energy business (wind and solar), I am often in discussions regarding the costs, benefits, and hidden costs of different strategies.  For example, wind kills a few birds and quite a few bats, solar panels aren't made on organic farms.  My response is always, "The only approach without tough trade offs is using less."

  •  Energy Efficiency costs about $0.03/kWh (0+ / 0-)

    All renewables are much higher.  I didn't want to bog my diary down with too many numbers, but the facts are pretty clear.  Building new coal plants is much more expensive than investing in efficiency, and renewables are higher still.

    No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little. - Edmund Burke

    by AdirondackForeverWild on Thu Sep 27, 2012 at 09:52:56 AM PDT

  •  Challenges (0+ / 0-)

    Poor people disproportionally rent, rather than own, their houses or apartments. Since tenants generally pay the utilities the landlords have little incentive to take advantage of any energy efficiency programs that are available. Short of making high efficiency appliances cheaper up front through rebates - no payback period - (a political nonstarter on many levels) landlords will generally replace with the lower cost, less efficient option. Other than maybe installing CFLs and similar non-permanent measures, tenants won't pay for improvements to property that isn't theirs.

    While I don't have any data to point to, I suspect it is the middle class that ends up benefitting the most from energy efficiency programs in practice.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site