Just how far is too far?
The number of times we hear the more extreme amongst them [with little or no internal reprimands that they believe that the private sector has the right to:
1] Select their customers based on race, gender, sexuality and creed.
2] What they pay their employees based on race, gender, sexuality and creed.
Seeing that they believe that all government does is interfere one would conclude they regard this lack of rights a norm.
Avoiding the "N" word has been tough, but foreign has been a go to method, not born here, must be a Muslim and if all else fails socialists. Casting a fellow citizen as a foreigner is just a sneaky way of using a racial slur. When Republicans were asked at the start of the Birther movement, the best of them merely avoided the question entirely.
By concentrating on what makes us different, and can hence be legislated against, they can avoid straightforward charges of sexism. It all for the baby rather than against the woman. Only the morally depraved would require that service. Well if you used common sense you wouldn't dress like that, and so on.
Here is an easier subject for them to deal with, they seem to all agree they really don't have to try that hard not to appear homophobic. It will ruin the army, promote bestiality, allow polygamy/polyandry and put our children in danger. They can say this with barely a murmur of dissent.
Continually going on about god, and we all know which god that happens to be, and how this is god's country sort of speaks for itself. If he is not one of us he must be a Muslim and he is a Muslim because he isn't white. We all know liberals cant be Christians don't we?
We all know this stuff is a figment of our imagination.