Skip to main content

The president is a good lawyer.  Tonight, he took Romney's deposition.  Romney had no choice but to make an earnest effort of it, so he fired all his shots, made all his claims.  The president could stand there, knowing the video was running on the deposition and let Romney say whatever he planned to say.  The president let Romney come to him and let him stake his positions wherever he wanted.  The president repeated all the clauses from his standard stump speeches.  He was excessively polite, even tried to pull Romney into a little Mod-to-Mod hug.  Romney ran from that by using the con diatribes, so his hand is out there, a hand he couldn't not play.  Use the Massachusetts governor thing, use the businessman thing, use the attack lies, use the detail=less policies, promise everything to everybody, including liberty and justice for all.

All the president has to do is peel apart everything Romney laid out in this first deposition.  That was an intentional lay down.

The only question is how hard to come on in debate number two, because Romney will likely change his tune again for that.  Mr. Obama tested Romney's response a couple times, probing for how he would respond to association with Ryan's budget, not too hard, but just looking for Romney's direction on that issue.

He also probed a little less gently on the Republican Congress opposition compared to the bipartisan way Democrats treated Reagan and Romney himself.

One of the debates is going to be a dismissal of the Republicans as a whole.  So far, the target has been Romney and he has sunk the Republicans.  Next, Mr. Obama is going to let the Republicans sink Romney and the rest of their ships.

Rope a dope.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (5+ / 0-)

    You don't need a quadrophonic Blaupunkt, you hayseed. You need a curveball!

    by GoBlue08 on Wed Oct 03, 2012 at 08:49:20 PM PDT

  •  The next face-off is a town hall style meeting (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    and hopefully that's where we'll get some questions on topics much less comfortable for Romney. I thought Jim Lehrer was a disaster, but I've honestly not come to expect any better of these moderators. In addition we don't know what the debate constraints were going into this - although the MSNBC crew had mentioned that most of the war-on-women issues were apparently off the table.

    That being said I wonder at President Obama's unwillingness to bring any of these issues into the debate. The question on the role of government was surely a place to point out the role in protecting civil rights for example - and a great opportunity to discuss the difference between republican and democratic notions of government involvement in everyday life (e.g. Democrats do not consider it a role of government to force women to be subjected to trans-vaginal probes).

    I can buy the "give him enough rope" argument for now, but I am really hoping the town hall provides a better opportunity for the President to really lay into the dystopian world-view of Republicans today. In the meantime we can also hope the wing-nuts will realise how completely Romney sold them down the river tonight - and start howling for "clarifications"

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site