Skip to main content

This blog is cross-posted at

I am very disappointed in this debate tonight. No one supports the President more than I do. And I happen to like him as a person who has lived a life of integrity and righteousness.

But I think the President was way too soft on Romney. I don’t think the President challenged Romney on his inconsistencies, his lies, his backers like the Koch Brothers and Karl Rove, Romney’s 47%, and disdain, even hatred, of those Ayn Rand called the takers. The President didn’t even hit Romney hard enough on Romneycare and Obamacare.

Obama did ok on Medicare, but he seemed to allow Romney to say they will sacrifice everyone on Medicaid – poor people.

This is not a damn game. This is not Harry Truman vs. Dwight Eisenhower. This is a declining democracy vs. an oligarchy or corporate state. This is not about Obama’s life. He’s a great man and be will have a great life. But this is about the average people of America – the poor, the working poor, the middle class.

Sometimes a leader has to fight. Sometimes a leader has to assert himself. Obama’s reference to Lincoln made a lot of sense – Lincoln faced much bigger challenges and won much bigger issues and Lincoln gave his entire life to that job. I wish Obama had gotten some of Lincoln’s balls quite frankly.

The country is at stake – pain and more pain.

It’s time to stand up for those being left behind. This is a freakin’ fight, not a game.

Step the shit up.


Stewart Acuff is America’s best-known and foremost labor organizer. He is the former organizing Director of the AFL-CIO. Acuff has also written two books: Playing Bigger Than You Are: A Life in Organizing, and Getting America Back to Work, coauthored by Dr. Richard Levins.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I've been told I didn't listen properly in 2008 (0+ / 0-)

    I'm being very careful now, listening to what's being said and I heard the President and Mittens are in fairly close agreement on Social Security.

    I'm also paying attention to what I'm not hearing. I know what we want but I'm not sure if the President wants it too. I know for a fact, though, that Mittens doesn't much care what happens except that he wins. I have no idea what he wants to do or what he would do.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site