Skip to main content

On Screen: Here's what Mitt Romney said at the debate, when he knew you were listening.

Mitt Romney Speaking at Debate, 10/3/12: I will keep America strong and get America's middle class working again.

Mitt Romney Speaking at Debate, 10/3/12: The people who are having a hard time right now are middle income Americans.

On Screen: Just remember what he said when he thought you weren't listening.

Mitt Romney at fundraiser, 5/17/12: There are 47% who are with him who are dependent upon government; who believe that they are victims/ [break in tape] And so, my job is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibilty and care for their lives.

On Screen: Which one do you think he really means?

On Screen: Obama-Biden Truth Team.

When I've posted web only ads before, there is always at least one person who comments about how they wish it was a television ad. So let me make this point up front. The reason every ad can't be broadcast on television has to do with budgeting campaign funds wisely. The campaign can not afford to buy air time for every ad it produces. However, this is the 21st century; not the 20th century. Do you know what's different now? The Internet and social media are playing a huge roll in this campaign, and this is a place that the Obama campaign blows Romney out of the water.

You may only have like-minded friends on Facebook who already agree with you. However, consider the people on Facebook who have accumulated hundreds of friends and acquaintances. When they post a web-only ad on their page, and it is seen and shared by a few other friends; there is a snowball effect. One of the primary purposes of these web only ads is that we help the campaign by sharing them via email and social media like Facebook and Twitter.

Another reason the campaign posts ads on the web only is for the media to pick up on the campaign's arguments on a particular issue. The ad will be mentioned for free in articles and on the 24/7 cable news stations. A good example of this is the Priorities USA Ad that was only broadcast on television once (by accident). And yet, it was talked about and written about constantly.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (17+ / 0-)

    “Mitt Romney is the only person in America who looked at the way this Congress is behaving and said, ‘I want the brains behind THAT operation.’ ” — Tom Perriello

    by hungrycoyote on Tue Oct 09, 2012 at 05:10:04 PM PDT

  •  Much better than that Big Bird bullshit (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hungrycoyote, palantir, gramofsam1

    I can't believe how much time and energy the Democrats have wasted on that Big Bird nonsense. No one who can vote gives a shit about Big Bird. You'll never win an election talking about Big Bird. The fact that the Democrats and the Obama team went on and on and on about that nonsense showed they are devoid of ideas.

    Romney lied for 90 minutes last week, almost every other word that came from his mouth was a boldfaced lie. And instead of pounding away on Romney's lies and flip flops the Dems yammered on and on and on about a mutherfucking puppet.

    Romney is a liar, a flip-flopper and an out-of-touch plutocrat. Those are THE ONLY things that the Democrats should be talking about, over and over again.

    After the debate I didn't feel so bad about it. Romney lied so much, and therein I thought was the Obama win. Before the debate Obama's team and the Democrats had successfully played up the idea that Romney was a flip-flopper, liar, and out-of-touch plutocrat. He gave them so much to work with in that debate had they not let themselves to make a bunch of mentally challenged jokes about Big Bird, they could've continued to pound away on the theme they played for 18 months about Romney.

    I'm glad to see they are starting to get back on message. I just hope it isn't too late.

    •  Don't worry. It's not only not too late, but even (5+ / 0-)

      better, the timing is absolutely perfect.  Let the man gloat for a few, then batter him with the truth.  

      Lying for Jesus might be the whole Republican Platform this cycle, however they won't be finding that to be a winning strategy come November 6th.

      GOTV and enjoy the victory.

      Obama in 2012: Because There Might Not Be Much Left by 2016

      by funluvn1 on Tue Oct 09, 2012 at 05:28:05 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  disagree (6+ / 0-)

      Plenty of people who vote "give a shit" about Big Bird...i do. Many of us do because the talk about "Big Bird" is not ABOUT Big Bird for many--it stands in for funding of public television and it's educational value, which levels the playing field for vulnerable children and provides ad -free educational programming.

      It also stands in for the meanness (I partially mean in the stingy way) of wanting to cut PBS and NPR because the right thinks they are left of center--an informed public might be more likely to vote Democrat so lets cut the one source of information that can't be bought by advertisers!. Cutting these programs will not solve our problems their desire to do so and that he mentioned it in the debate showcases quite a bit about the current Republican party and Romney.
      How he cares about lower income kids (who don't have cable), for instance.

    •  A lot of people do care about Big Bird (6+ / 0-)

      but it's not "Big Bird" that is the issue ... it's what he represents: Pre-school education for children who otherwise wouldn't get it. Just because this might not a major issue for you, don't underestimate how big an issue it is for other people.

      One of the best explanations of this was Charles Blow's oped the other day:

      Since 1969, Big Bird has been the king of the block on “Sesame Street.” When I was a child, he and his friends taught me the alphabet and the colors and how to do simple math.

      Do you know how to do simple math, Mr. Romney? Maybe you and the Countess Von Backward could exchange numbers.

      Big Bird and his friends also showed me what it meant to resolve conflicts with kindness and accept people’s differences and look out for the less fortunate. Do you know anything about looking out for the less fortunate, Mr. Romney? Or do you think they’re all grouches scrounging around in trash cans?

      Don’t Mess With Big Bird

      “Mitt Romney is the only person in America who looked at the way this Congress is behaving and said, ‘I want the brains behind THAT operation.’ ” — Tom Perriello

      by hungrycoyote on Tue Oct 09, 2012 at 05:49:13 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Big Bird represents our social commitment (0+ / 0-)

        to each other and to what we can do together as a people, as a nation.

        It is the antithesis of the Romney go-it-alone, pay-your-own- way crowd.

        Big Bird is about family and community values, in contrast to Romney's business/marketing approach that values rearranging the goods on the shelf and reducing wages to the bare minimum for workers, and for fomenting class conflict, and for scanning pregnant women's uteruses.

        "There's nothing serious about a plan that claims to reduce the deficit by spending a trillion dollars on tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires." - President Obama

        by fhcec on Tue Oct 09, 2012 at 11:36:50 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site