Skip to main content

I've given some thought to the Repubs embrace of the tea baggers, and have come to the conclusion that it represents that party's second historic sell -out of epic proportions.  An unbelievably calculating, shameless, lack-of-any-level-of-ethical-behavior kind of sell out.  

More after the squiggely thingie..

Here's the ugly history:  Back in the 1960's, when LBJ was leading the fight for civil rights legislation, he knew that it would alienate  the conservative, racist part of his Democratic party, but he was willing to do it anyway because it was the right thing to do for the country.  He famously said "we've just lost the south for a generation".  Oh, if it had only been for a generation!

At that point, the Republicans had their own choice to make.  They could have made it clear that there was no room in THEIR party for the racists either, which would have marginalized the haters.  Instead, the Republicans, lead by Richard Nixon, created the infamous Southern Strategy, which aggressively courted these conservative ex-democrats by playing to their racist fears.  St. Ronald Reagan continued the strategy, using code words like "welfare queens" to build on the racist belief that all minorities are out to take advantage of the system.

Pandering to racist fears has  been a core part of the Republican strategy ever since.  Look, I know there are decent Republicans out there, who follow the party for financial, not social reasons, but you have to admit that their voices have been totally drowned out by the nutbars.

And when the tea party arose from the primordial muck (fueled by the Koch bothers mega-fortunes), those dwindling few decent  Republicans had one more chance to stand up for the voices of fairness, sanity and reason.  They could have rejected the ignorance, extremism and hatred represented by the Tea Party core beliefs.  Instead, the Republicans doubled down and turned over the keys to their whole party to the wingnuts in the tri-corner hats.  

You see - the 1%, for whom all Republican policies are intended to benefit, simply don't have enough voters in their midst to win at the polls.  So they HAVE to partner with the social neanderthals who have broader numbers in order to have any hope of winning an election.  A marriage made in hell for sure!

Just to recap:  To the everlasting shame of the Dems, ours was the party of inherited racism prior to the 1960s.  Yet with the courageous leadership of a VERY flawed politician (LBJ) we shed that awful skin.  Since that time, the Republicans have knowingly, calculatedly and coldly embraced this racism by choice at two critical junctures in our history.  They could have chosen to take the high road and keep the most radical elements of our society from infiltrating their midst.  Instead, they embraced the nuts, gave them a major party platform, and indeed, their party has come to be defined by this extremism.

Ultimately this will be the party's undoing, because the tea nuts are so extreme, and so unwilling to compromise, that they will end up marginalizing themselves.  The Republican party is too old and too exclusively white to survive in a country that is increasingly diverse.  Oddly enough, I will mourn their demise, because I believe that  the country really does need two strong, competent, and honest parties in order to make our democracy work.  Sadly, the tea baggers were never really interested in governing - they just want to rule.

Let me be clear:  The Democratic party is a disappointment to me in many ways - failing to be courageous in defense of party's liberal tenets, failing to competently articulate our vision of the legitimate role that government plays in a healthy society, failing to support truly progressive candidates, surrendering individual liberties on the pretense of keeping us safe and more.  But the Republican party couldn't not be more shameless - pandering to the least knowledgeable, most racist, most hateful elements of our society and giving them control of your party.

And why ANY gay person (a group of which I am one!) would affiliate with this party whose official party platform vilifies us is a total mystery to me.  

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site