If Romney wants to cut the budget for PBS, museums, infrastructure, food stamps (i.e. feeding the poor like his faith says he has to do), and give tax cuts to rich people such as himself, then he must believe that it is more important for him to have this money than them. So, why?
Someone please ask him: What will you do with that extra money, that you can't do with the millions you already have, that will be better for the public good than the programs you want to starve?
If we don't want to borrow from China to pay for PBS, why would we want to borrow from China to pay for a car elevator?
P.S. Sorry for the excessive italicization.