Skip to main content

Will H.I.G.-owned e-voting machines give Romney the White House?
by Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
October 12, 2012
Electronic voting machines owned by Mitt Romney's business buddies and set to count the votes in Cincinnati could decide the 2012 election.

The narrative is already being hyped by the corporate media. As Kelly O'Donnell reported for NBC's Today Show on Monday, October 8, Ohio's Hamilton County is "ground zero" for deciding who holds the White House come January, 2013.

O'Donnell pointed out that no candidate has won the White House without carrying Ohio since John Kennedy did it in 1960. No Republican has EVER won the White House without Ohio's electoral votes.

As we document in the e-book WILL THE GOP STEAL AMERICA'S 2012 ELECTION ( George W. Bush got a second term in 2004 thanks to the manipulation of the electronic vote count by Ohio's then-Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell. Blackwell served as the co-chair of the state's committee to re-elect Bush/Cheney while simultaneously administering the election.

The widespread use of electronic voting machines from ES&S, and of Diebold software maintained by Triad, allowed Blackwell to electronically flip a 4% Kerry lead to a 2% Bush victory in the dead of election night. ES&S, Diebold and Triad were all owned or operated by Republican partisans. The shift of more than 300,000 votes after 12:20 am election night was a virtual statistical impossibility. It was engineered by Michael Connell, an IT specialist long affiliated with the Bush Family. Blackwell gave Connell's Ohio-based GovTech the contract to count Ohio's votes, which was done on servers housed in the Old Pioneer Bank Building in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Thus the Ohio vote tally was done on servers that also carried the e-mail for Karl Rove and the national Republican Party. Connell died in a mysterious plane crash in December, 2008, after being subpoenaed in the King-Lincoln-Bronzeville federal lawsuit focused on how the 2004 election was decided (disclosure: we were attorney and plaintiff in that suit).

Diebold's founder, Walden O'Dell, had vowed to deliver Ohio's electoral votes---and thus the presidency---to his friend George W. Bush. That it was done in part on electronic voting machines and software O'Dell happened to own (Diebold has since changed hands twice) remains a cautionary red flag for those who believe merely winning the popular vote will give Barack Obama a second term.

This November, much of the Ohio electorate will cast its ballots on machines again owned by close cronies of the Republican presidential candidate. In Cincinnati and elsewhere around the state, the e-voting apparati are owned by Hart Intercivic. Hart's machines are infamous for mechanical failures, "glitches," counting errors and other timely problems now thoroughly identified with the way Republicans steal elections. As in 2004, Ohio's governor is now a Republican. This time it's the very right-wing John Kasich, himself a multi-millionaire courtesy of a stint at Lehman Brothers selling state bonds, and the largesse of Rupert Murdoch, on whose Fox Network Kasich served as a late night bloviator. Murdoch wrote Kasich a game-changing $1 million check just prior to his winning the statehouse, an electoral victory shrouded in electronic intrigue. The exit polls in that election indicated that his opponent, incumbent Democrat Ted Strickland, had actually won the popular vote.

Ohio's very Republican Secretary of State is John Husted, currently suing in the US Supreme Court to prevent the public from voting on the weekend prior to election day. As did Blackwell and Governor Robert Taft in 2004, Husted and Kasich will control Ohio's electronic vote count on election night free of meaningful public checks or balances

Hart Intercivic, on whose machines the key votes will be cast in Hamilton County, which includes Cincinnati, was taken over last year by H.I.G. Capital. Prominent partners and directors on the H.I.G. board hail from Bain Company or Bain Capital, both connected to Mitt Romney. H.I.G. employees have contributed at least $338,000 to Romney's campaign. H.I.G. Directors John P. Bolduk and Douglas Berman are major Romney fundraisers, as is former Bain and H.I.G. manager Brian Shortsleeve.

US courts have consistently ruled that the software in electronic voting machines is proprietary to the manufacturer, even though individual election boards may own the actual machines. Thus there will be no vote count transparency on election night in Ohio. The tally will be conducted by Hart Intercivic and controlled by Husted and Kasich, with no public recourse or accountability. As federal testimony from the deceased Michael Connell made clear in 2008, electronically flipping an election is relatively cheap and easy to do, especially if you or your compatriots programmed the machines.

So as the corporate media swarm through Ohio, reporting breathlessly from "ground zero" in Cincinnati, don't hold your own breath waiting for them to also clarify that the voting machines in what may once again be America's decisive swing state are owned, programmed and tabulated by some of the Romney campaign's closest associates.

Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman are co-authors of WILL THE GOP STEAL AMERICA'S 2012 ELECTION?, an e-book.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Terrifying: (7+ / 0-)

    US courts have consistently ruled that the software in electronic voting machines is proprietary to the manufacturer, even though individual election boards may own the actual machines. Thus there will be no vote count transparency on election night in Ohio. The tally will be conducted by Hart Intercivic and controlled by Husted and Kasich, with no public recourse or accountability.

    That's one more thing to add to my long list of small problems. --my son, age 10

    by concernedamerican on Fri Oct 12, 2012 at 02:09:25 PM PDT

  •  How Dare YOU!!! (4+ / 0-)
    Will H.I.G.-owned e-voting machines give Romney the White House?
    Mitt Romney and Company (heh!) PAID  good money to have the votes counted in his favour.

    Notice: This Comment © 2012 ROGNM

    by ROGNM on Fri Oct 12, 2012 at 02:11:00 PM PDT

  •  How the hell is this not (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    nuclear winter solstice, George3

    a conflict of interest? I mean I know it's not, but it sure a heck should be - it's terrifying!

    America is a COUNTRY, not a CORPORATION. She doesn't need a CEO. Vote Obama.

    by manneckdesign on Fri Oct 12, 2012 at 02:25:56 PM PDT


    Yes, I'm yelling! But I'll also be helping about 15 other people hand-count the vote for our town with a voter roll of close to 2800. For the last big election, 2500 of 'em showed up. It only takes until about midnight, and it's easier than playing cards. It's also infinitely satisfying to know that each and every single ballot is present and accounted for, cross-tabulated so that every single column adds up. Including- no-votes, under-votes, silly write-ins, and serious write-ins. Every vote counts and is counted. It can be done and it should be done.

    It costs money to reprogram the machines for each little tiny election that occurs, especially when we have things like "vote for one of these seats for the one-year position, vote for two for the three year position, and one at large..." It may or may not be a simple algorithm to get that sort of thing properly programmed, but personally I'd rather we just wrote it all down and piled them into piles to be counted. It works.

    And I resent that all of our hard work to keep it real and honest may go down the tubes with the electronic "votes" from everywhere else.

  •  President Obama should nationalize all the voting (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    IreGyre, anyname, peptabysmal, KenBee

    machines and software.  Then have independent vendors post the code in open source forums and offer a bounty for finding backdoors, errors and misc. "issues".  

    Good Sense is Seldom Common

    •  could he nationalize all the voting machines (0+ / 0-)

      on Nov 1, 2012:

      he has election lawyers and computer security experts - - put them to work 24 hours per starting Nov. 01

      til the election and all the machine results are checked for Romney's backdoor keys;

      We’ve got four weeks left in the election and we’re going to take it to him. ~ President Obama

      by anyname on Fri Oct 12, 2012 at 03:53:42 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  every 4 years this happens.. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    States' run their own elections, and choose their voting apparatus. The "help America vote act", certainly made our elections much easier to be tampered with, but since that time, most states have implemented paper ballots, so that a recount can be done, if the vote is close. Of course, choosing the counties to be recounted is problematic. Remember Kenneth Blackwell?  Many states have initiated automatic random recounts after each election, but I don't think  those states are the ones that have had questionable outcomes. If people in their own states want clean elections it's within their power to have them. Looking for federal law to nationalize elections gave us HAVA...and look where that got us. The people of Ohio don't seem to care.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site