Skip to main content

U.S. Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney speaks at his Illinois primary night rally in Schaumburg, Illinois, March 20, 2012. REUTERS/Jim Young (UNITED STATES  - Tags: POLITICS ELECTIONS)
Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler takes a look at Mitt Romney's claim that he has a jobs plan that will create 12 million new jobs and finds out that it doesn't add up.

The first problem is that Mitt Romney actually has two different claims about creating 12 million jobs. One of those claims is that he would create 12 million jobs over the next four years, but as Kessler notes, the problem with that claim is that economic forecasters are already predicting 12 million new jobs over the next four years. That's what would happen with or without Romney in the White House, so it's really a meaningless claim.

Perhaps because of that fact, Romney has recently started touting a new 12 million job claim, claiming that he will create 12 million jobs that would not have otherwise been created. That's the claim the Kessler spends most of his time assessing, and here's what he found:

  • Romney's claim is based on three studies, but two of the three studies didn't actually assess any of Romney's proposals and the third is a projection covering a ten year time period.
  • One of the studies—which Romney's campaign claims accounts for three of his 12 million jobs claims—actually is a report on energy sector jobs growth based on current policies, many of which Romney has pledged to repeal. So far from adding three million jobs, Romney's threat to repeal green energy policies could actually cost jobs. Even if the three million jobs claim wasn't bogus, however, the timeframe of the study was eight years—not the four of his original 12 million claim.
  • Another one of the studies is a report on what would happen if China were to respect intellectual property rights. According to report, two million jobs would be created. But the baseline for that estimate was last year, when unemployment was much higher than it is today, and as the report points out, that would diminish the number of jobs to be created. Moreover, the report makes no mention of Mitt Romney—so he's embracing a two million jobs figure that didn't assess his campaign proposals nor is likely to be accurate given today's economic conditions.
  • The final study is a report from a Rice University professor which claims Romney's tax plan would create seven million jobs over ten years. As Kessler notes, at least this report purported to examine a Romney proposal, but ten years is not four years. And even if you ignore that fact, you'd still have to believe that cutting taxes on the rich will generate so much economic growth that employment would go up by 7 million jobs above and beyond what it would have done without the tax cuts. If you believe that, you didn't pay attention to the Bush presidency.

Bottom-line: Mitt Romney started out with a claim of creating 12 million jobs over the next four years. It turned out that economists say they already expect that many jobs to be created, so Romney needed to change his talking point to something that he could claim was 12 million jobs above and beyond what would have been created. In order to do that, he grabbed three studies, two of which didn't examine his policy proposals and one of which projected jobs growth over a ten year period, ending in 2023.

Romney continues to present this 12 million jobs figure as if it were real without noting that it's actually a projection for what would happen by 2023. Even if you give him credit for the seven million jobs projected in the paper on his tax plan, the average annual job gains that he's talking about are 700,000—less than one-quarter of his original 12 million jobs claim. So even by Romney's own math, his numbers don't add up. Unless, of course, you believe in magic asterisks.

Originally posted to The Jed Report on Tue Oct 16, 2012 at 07:28 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site