Skip to main content

While President Obama clearly won last night’s Town Hall debate, the biggest loser was not Mitt Romney. Rather, it was the environment.

It was disconcerting to hear both men argue about who could drill more on Federal land, or who could mine more dirty coal.

Renewable energy like solar, wind, and geothermal only received lip service from both candidates with no specific plans divulged.

Romney did talk about energy independence. But his plan involves more dependence on drilling and mining – both processes are environmentally hostile to the land, air, and water. Note that Romney keeps talking about North American energy independence – not (U.S.) American energy independence. Is his plan to replace Saudi Arabia with Canada as our source of dirty energy? While I’d rather see our dollars go north to help fund Canada’s (gasp!) socialized medical care than have it go to the sheiks, a far better solution would be to help balance the trade deficit by promoting indigenous energy sources.

No single issue exists in isolation. Promoting clean energy development to make it affordable helps energy-dependent businesses, improves the health of Americans through clean air and water, and creates millions of jobs. I would have liked to see the President outline an Apollo-like program with specific energy independence goals that would include boosting the training of scientists and engineers in the energy field, promoting science in the elementary schools, and providing businesses with incentives for them to act as co-investors in this important initiative. This could all be paid for by the elimination of the billions of dollars we spend subsidizing dirty fuels.

We need not only to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, but we need to reduce our dependence on dirty fuel. Neither candidate convinced me that he has a plan.

Cross-Posted from deciminyan.org

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  One candidate supports green energy (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Gooserock, bluedust

    One candidate brags about his resolute dedication to fossil fuels only.

    So yeah, in the final analysis, the candidates are identical.

  •  Crowly had a climate change question (0+ / 0-)

    but they didn't get to it.  She said she just didn't have the time to get to the climate change question.

  •  The poor, the old and vulnerable (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bluedust

    Lots of concern for the guy making $249,999,99 though.

  •  What a crap diary (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bluedust, gramofsam1

    Read the transcript.  Obama was clearly the champion for the environment.  He championed solar and wind over and over, showed Romney off for opposing and wanting to do away with wind energy exploration altogether.

    Here are the salient parts of the debate:

    Obama:

    "Number three, we've got to control our own energy. Now, not only oil and natural gas, which we've been investing in; but also, we've got to make sure we're building the energy source of the future, not just thinking about next year, but ten years from now, 20 years from  now. That's why we've invested in solar and wind and biofuels, energy
     efficient cars."

    and

    "Natural gas production is the highest it's been in decades. We have seen increases in coal production and coal employment. But what  I've also said is we can't just produce traditional source of energy.

     We've also got to look to the future. That's why we doubled fuel efficiency standards on cars. That means that in the middle of the  next decade, any car you buy, you're going to end up going twice as  far on a gallon of gas. That's why we doubled clean - clean energy
     production like wind and solar and biofuels.

    And all these things have contributed to us lowering our oil
     imports to the lowest levels in 16 years. Now, I want to build on that. And that means, yes, we still continue to open up new areas for drilling. We continue to make it a priority for us to go after  natural gas. We've got potentially 600,000 jobs and 100 years worth
     of energy right beneath our feet with natural gas.

    And we can do it in an environmentally sound way. But we've also got to continue to figure out how we have efficiency energy, because ultimately that's how we're going to reduce demand and that's what's going to keep gas prices lower.

    Now, Governor Romney will say he's got an all-of-the-above plan, but basically his plan is to let the oil companies write the energy  policies. So he's got the oil and gas part, but he doesn't have the  clean energy part. And if we are only thinking about tomorrow or the  next day and not thinking about 10 years from now, we're not going to  control our own economic future. Because China, Germany, they're  making these investments. And I'm not going to cede those jobs of the  future to those countries. I expect those new energy sources to be  built right here in the United States.

    So what I've tried to do is be consistent. With respect to
     something like coal, we made the largest investment in clean coal  technology, to make sure that even as we're producing more coal, we're  producing it cleaner and smarter. Same thing with oil, same thing  with natural gas."

    I marked the comment that discuss the environment, either direct or indirect.   This shows that your diary is complete BS, sorry to say.  Clean and efficient energy comments were a huge part of Obama's evening.   Your recollection is simply wrong, as the quotes I provided prove.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site