Skip to main content

Because you get fucked by them.
For some reason, the West Coast has this infatuation with “propositions”.  As near as I can tell, they are mob actions that force legislators to pass the laws they propose (let’s not even go into the Washington license tag fee fiasco). To my knowledge, no voter-endorsed proposition has ever been rejected by that state’s legislature.
The latest indecent proposal to appear in Washington state is I-1240. (Personally, I wish they’d put stylized names on these things instead of numbers – how elegant “Student School Freedom Proposition” would sound!  Is that what it really does? Probably not). This improper “prop” is about making charter schools legal in the state – whatever that means. The ads and flyers blather on about how 44 other states have started charter schools, so Washington should too. I love this argument – reminds me of what my mom would say when I’d want to do something I saw someone else do: “So if Johnnie jumped off a bridge, you would too?” Forty-four other states have cases of West Nile virus – so Washington should too!
Reading off this flyer I got today in the mail, it says the new law (notice it’s already assumed to be a law once the prop passes) will “allow up to 40 public charter schools”.  Hmmm….

Does that mean NEW schools will be built, presumably to take students who won’t be going to public schools anymore? And the now less-populated schools do what? I assume, lay off union teachers and close.  It promises “strict accountability” – yeah, uh huh, No Child Left Behind, that worked so good – but I think the only “accounting” to be implemented will be by the bookkeepers of these private schools totaling up profits.
I can see how this would work – take your kid out of public  school, get (example figure) $3000 per kid to pay for his/her schooling in a charter school. I’d be guessing that the basic tuition at your new local charter school to be say, oh (example figure) $5000.  Meaning now you have to cough up (example figure) two grand for the same schooling you got before. Great deal there!! Kinda like those deals of “Get $50 back!” – if you buy $500 worth of merchandise, that is. But hey, the technique works in business, might as well use it for schooling our kids.
Endorsements, endorsements, endorsements on the flyer, from many important state newspapers. Hmmm, none from teachers unions or school districts, or educational organizations.  Well, that just shows how backwards those people are.
I heard or read somewhere studies have shown that people are paying private “technical schools”  three, four, five times the tuition for the same training and education they could get from their local state-run community college. But how much cooler is it for your diploma to say “University of Phonyix” than “Lakeside Community College”??? YEAH!!
So I-1240 will probably get “passed”,  and the people of Washington will get fucked, as usual.  Why so cynical? Actually it’s reality, my friend. Let me tell you the story of the last big “proposition” that went through in Washington state, the one that closed the state liquor stores in favor of selling booze through retail outlets.  This was a big one, much discussed – in fact it took two tries to pass it. And the ads were apparently from both sides – the state should get out of the liquor business; kids will now find it  easier to get booze; liquor prices will be cheaper through a store; Emergency Responders Against Liquor Law Change; this is good and why; this is bad and why.  All thoughtful considerations. All of it, both pro- and anti-state liquor store propaganda, smoke and mirrors. Nothing but hype, both sides, made-up stuff that was so far from the reality of the proposed change. So, the public finally approves of private liquor sales, the big changeover happens (600 state liquor store employees lost their jobs, BTW), the big day arrives – and Surprise!! All the booze at stores is MORE expensive than it was in the state stores!!! WTF….????
Later, talking with some people in the know, I found out the real reason the law was changed was to, yes, enrich large businesses and reduce the state’s revenue. This wasn’t about cheaper booze for the consumer, or to save our kids from unscrupulous booze stores. It was about maximizing profits for business.  Because it turns out that the major income source, by far, for the state liquor stores was from the restaurants, bars, and other liquor-using venues that bought all  their booze through the state. And one of the key provisions of the fucking over was that NO TAXES would be paid on BUSINESS SALES of liquor from distributors and big stores like Costco, or anyone selling to a business. However, for the poor suckers like you and me a new  added 20% liquor tax, PLUS a $4 /liter extra tax, was to be ONLY levied on the consumer. All of which, needless to say, pushed the final price of your preferred poison to more than or the same as you’d paid before. Notice that this is the same old case of YOU pay taxes, but the well-off don’t have to. This revelation clarified the rumor that Costco was buying ads for BOTH of these “sides”. Well ... did ANYBODY present the real sides of the debate beforehand? Nope. WTF….???
So won on this? The distributors who sell the booze, the warehouse stores that many small businesses buy their supplies from. THEY got to keep the profit mark-up that otherwise would have gone to the state as revenue.  I seriously doubt last June 1st bar and restaurant patrons saw their mixed drink prices drop by a quarter to a third of what they’d been the day before --- that money went to the owners, the suppliers. So who lost? The poor schmuck who saw no savings or even a loss on his purchases of liquor – and of course the Washington residents who now are deprived of the benefits that state liquor revenue gave them in schools, state police, highway maintenance … all that shit that doesn’t matter. At least to wealthy people.
So, Washingtonians, vote for this charter school scam, don’t vote for it, be assured that all you’re being told about it has nothing at all to do with the real effects of the indecent proposition. Me? I plan not to vote for it – in fact not going to vote at all, ever again, for the rest of my life (personal lifestyle choice). The game is rigged; all you see is illusion, whether laws, propositions, politicians . But if you still believe in the game, then I’ve got some choice real estate in Aleppo, Syria I want to sell you.

Originally posted to fourthcornerman on Wed Oct 24, 2012 at 08:09 PM PDT.

Also republished by PacNW Kossacks.


Let's have a proposition that bans propositions.

66%12 votes
33%6 votes

| 18 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    George3, Leftleaner, myboo, Turbonerd

    Ash-sha'b yurid isqat an-nizzam!

    by fourthcornerman on Wed Oct 24, 2012 at 08:09:43 PM PDT

  •  I refuse to buy booze at Costco (0+ / 0-)

    because they were the ones who bought and paid for the liquor initiative.  The charter school initiative is bought and paid for by the private school owners who want to take $$ from the local schools and take it themselves.  

    Initiatives are a grassroots idea taken over by the corporations, from Bill Gates to the Koch Brothers, and the people of WA frequently (but not always)  fall for the lies.

    We should not be fighting about equal pay for equal work and access to birth control in 2012. Elizabeth Warren

    by Leftleaner on Wed Oct 24, 2012 at 08:18:43 PM PDT

  •  As a general rule I vote no by default. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    But I always read up on them just to be safe.

    We lose if we choose to forget; the lives of men, and money spent.

    by DeanDemocrat on Wed Oct 24, 2012 at 09:26:49 PM PDT

  •  as a general rule, I *never* sign a petition (0+ / 0-)

    Doesn't matter how much I might agree with the sentiment behind an initiative ... I will never, ever put my name on one of those petitions.

    Much as I detest the whole I&R system and its damaging effect on the state, I wouldn't even sign a petition asking to end the practice. But I sure as hell would vote for it if it made it to the ballot.

    Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration. -- K.Marx A.Lincoln

    by N in Seattle on Thu Oct 25, 2012 at 12:43:03 AM PDT

  •  My prime suspect for charter schools (0+ / 0-)

    is always union-busting.

    Mostly it's a reorg in place of an existing institution that adds for-profit management and subtracts unions.  I know there are good, effective charters out there, but I've gotten highly, highly cynical about the label.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site