Skip to main content

From "the Gearhead Voter Guide" over at my gearhead blog

Well, it’s that time of the leap year again… presidential election time, with every congressional seat and a third of the senate up for grabs in the second and third rings. And up and down the midway, thousands of state and local seats are up for grabs too. Heck, I’m even in this circus, runnin’ unopposed for my council seat in the City of Florence, Minnesota (population 39). So as a public service, here’s the inaugural edition of the gearhead voters guide…

Now with Amtrak’s thirty year old trains running at capacity, highways crumbling, and a fully loaded 40 foot ISO container still illegal on most roads here thanks to the 1982 STAA that still hasn’t been updated, you’d think our politicians would be discussing some solutions. But the only morsels of gearhead issues that’s boiled to the top of this years global warming boosting political debate is Obama and the democrats salvation of the american auto industry.

Now one would think that Mr. Romney and his republicans would find some better issues… GM and Chrysler have survived, a million or three american jobs have been saved, and the relics of the political right are still complaining. But then again, what can one expect from a bunch of folks that, unable to figure out the metric system and computers, have formed a political movement to try and drag us bag to the days before both were invented?

Those folks have no interest in logical analysis and couldn’t care less if GM and Mopar had been stuffed in containers and hauled back to China, leaving the midwest in a decades long depression. As long as the Chinese shipped back brand new 60s and earlier cars with “english” fasteners and no computers sold at WalMart prices they’d be happy as pigs escaped from the hog barns you can see from space. But for those more enlightened, let’s do a bit more analysis of the auto bailout and it’s successes and failures.

Making a short hop in the WayBack machine to 2008, we find GM and Chrysler flirting with bankruptcy. Banks are clamming up and rumors swirl that not only GM and Chrysler but McDonalds too may not be able to make payroll. With no money to borrow, not only will GM and Chrysler be unable to get working capital to pay employees, buy parts, and maintain an inventory of new cars to sell… But there’s no capital available for anyone to buy up the companies and keep them operating, even at salvage prices.

So began a truly bipartisan effort to save the american auto industry, with the Bush administration inviting both major presidential candidates off the campaign trail to the White House to work out a workaround to prevent the auto industry’s collapse and a full blown depression. Out of that and later meetings came a plan to loan GM and Chrysler and struggling suppliers enough $$$ to make it through that crisis. With some opposition from the more rabid of the republican party, that plan was passed and GM and Chrysler filed Chapter 11 (reorganization) rather than Chapter 7 (liquidation) bankruptcy and survived.

Now one would think that Mr. Romney and his republicans would be quite happy to see these two great capitalist enterprises survive. But no, like children who didn’t get to eat desert first and were forced to eat their vegetables, they’re whining. Whining about the Volt, a billion dollar boondoggle that has once and for all proven that the electric car isn’t ready for prime time. Now I’ve been following the electric car nerds chatter for decades. They incessantly believe that the viable electric car is either just around the corner or is already here, but big bad GM et al won’t give it a chance. Well, under pressure from it’s major stockholder, us U.S. citizens, GM gave the Volt a billion dollar chance, fully developing an electric car and putting it in showrooms all over the country. And it’s been a dismal failure in the marketplace, struggling to sell 10,000 units a year despite huge tax incentives. So for a billion dollars we have proven that electric cars are at best a niche market, and we can finally lay the electric car to rest in the automotive graveyard, next to the Chaparral and GT40.

The legendary Chaparral and GT40? Yup, neither made a cent, but the technology that was developed for those great race cars went on to improve performance and efficiency in millions of cars since. One of the reasons the Volt cost a billion to  develop is that it isn’t just a Chevy Cruze with batteries and an electric motor dropped in- virtually the whole car was lightened with advanced materials and technology. Just think of what an awesome hot rod you could build with a Volt, minus the road thugging weight of the electric motor and batteries!

And while Mr. Romney and his republicans have been blaming Mr. Obama for saving the Volt, which he probably had little or no say in anyways, they fail to give Mr. Obama credit for saving the Corvette or Camaro. Now personally, I think the current Camaro is butt ugly compared to it’s 60s inspiration, and really wouldn’t want to in any way be “credited” with it’s continued existence. But the Corvette is alive and well and better than ever! But it’s sales are barely besting those of the Volt, and GM is spending at least a few hundred million if not a billion developing the soon to be released C7, the 7th generation Corvette. Yup, “Government Motors” not only brought the Volt to market, but they’re bringing us a better than ever ‘Vette and have an active racing operation too.

So if Mr. Romney and his gang of republicans and their living in the past centuries followers want to blame Mr. Obama for the Volt, they’d better give him credit for keeping the world’s best sports car value, the Corvette, more alive than ever. And hopefully GM can spare some change to restyle the Camaro…

More to follow… Did Mr. Romney’s friends the “vulture capitalists” kill off GM’s medium trucks?


Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

    •  Wish I could afford one... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      But for the same money, I can but two Cruzes. Or for a little more, a 'Vette... But hot hatches are more my style. I see another TDI in my future, if I can wear out the current one.

      •  With the $7500 Federal tax credit and the (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        The Wizard, kurt, aaraujo

        $6000 CO tax credit my fully equipped Volt cost $29,000. A comparably equipped Cruze costs $25,000, though the Volt has some things you can't get on the Cruze. The Volt is an infinitely better car that the Cruz does not even compare to. Plus I'm saving $250 per month in fuel costs over my prior car. That together with 0% financing for six years caused my daughter to saying that buying it was a no brainer.

        That was 3500 miles ago and the car has exceeded all expectations. It is a blast to drive and costs about a penny a mile for electricity which is 95% of my miles. My total cost for those miles is $15 for electricity and $25 for seven gallons of gas.

        Further, affiant sayeth not.

        by Gary Norton on Sat Oct 27, 2012 at 12:04:44 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Vettes and Volts (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Gary Norton, kurt

    We have 2 Vettes (a '94 ZR1 and a '78 Stingray) and a Volt.  My husband is both a Corvette Guy AND a Volt guy.  It's kind of like Jay Leno said on Top Gear -- the electric car will save the racing cars like the automobile saved the horse to be something more than just a beast of burden.  We don't drive the Vettes a whole lot.  They're for fun in the sun or days at the track (which we get none of this time of year in Seattle).  The Volt is an absolutely wonderful car and the Volts are just getting better every year that they're made.  

  •  Looks like I just helped to sell another Volt (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    CwV, kurt

    I was. Walking back. To my Volt where I was getting a free charge at the Walgreens in Vienna, VA.

    There was a gentleman taking a picture of my Red Volt and he approached me with a few questions.  His main concern was whether he would be stuck if the charge ran down.  After I explained how the extended feature works in the Volt, he told me he was going to buy one now.

    Apparantly, the salesmen down the street in Koons Chevrolet are quite clueless when it comes to the Volt.

    I have very little experience with the charge running down.  I have not had that happen since February.  Since then I have gone over 13,000 gas free miles.

    I just love this. Car!!!!!

    •  Not enough range for me... (0+ / 0-)

      Yesterday drove 70 miles to George McGovern's funeral in Sioux Falls and back, not a charging station anywhere. Today drove 40 miles, might have barely done it on batteries in the cold weather. And can you tow a trailer with the Volt?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site