Skip to main content

When Nate Silver tells Politico...

"Romney, clearly, could still win."
...he's saying that in the exact same context as this last weekend's football game between the New England Patriots and the St. Louis Rams.

Before Sunday's game New England came in as a 7 point favorite and about a 3 to 1 straight odds to win the game.

Coincidentally, that's pretty much where things stand with Obama and Romney.

So, before the game... COULD St. Louis have won?

OF COURSE, it's a football game, with two professional teams.

Anything COULD happen.

Hell, election day 2008... even John McCain COULD have won.

Now, back to yesterday.

What happened in the New England/St. Louis game where New England was a 3 to 1 favorite?

Final score... New England 45, St. Louis 7.

See, in the end, you can only put your money on one team, and those who bet on New England made money.

And those who put their on New England are much happier then those who chose to put cash -- straight up -- on St. Louis.

And those who put their money on St. Louis... thinking it was a 50-50 bet... well, would be what I currently call Republicans.

What Nate Silver is saying is the same as what the Princeton Election Consortium is saying... same as what every poll aggregator is saying... same as what Intrade Markets are saying... same as what any honest, informed, and the willfully educated person is saying:

The odds are WITH the President and a Romney victory will be a massive upset.

And those who cannot understand that... should shut their fucking faces.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site