Skip to main content

Now is the time for defenders of the current administration (and all reasonable people out there) to reshape the dialogue in this country.  The iron it hot to make a firm push on climate change, while politically and ideologically isolating the tea-party and all who support an anti-science agenda.

It would be a very effective reframing of the argument about 'negligence' in Benghazi to point out that the real cover-up here is that orchestrated by the right wing about climate change.  With the death toll rising to near 100 in the second tropical storm to hit New York/New Jersey in two years, isn't it fair to point out that the effects of climate change are caused by continual negligence of climate related issues?  Isn't it the case that by either burying one's head, or proactively striving to lie about climate science, people are dying?  Isn't it fair to say that the people who deny the science behind this killer are to be at least partially implicated in every subsequent death?

How do the lives lost in Sandy (and every subsequent northerly hurricane), and the billions of dollars lost compare the the four individuals murdered by terrorists in one of the most hostile regions of the world?  Chris Christie was right to dismiss out of hand the absurdity of talking about Romney possibly visiting New Jersey at a time of so much suffering.  Likewise, it would be appropriate and effective to dismiss out of hand discussion of relatively small issues like the Benghazi attacks compared to the massive rising toll of climate change.  The lives lost in Benghazi were tragic, but even more tragic is the decades long "discussion" we have been having about whether or not climate change is real.  The evidence is irrefutable.  

If re-elected, President Obama should call on America to move on from this debate, make an official statement that the position of the President of the United States government is that climate change is real, it is caused by humans, and that it is one of--if not the--biggest threats to our national security and the security of all humanity.  If Tea-Partiers want to hold discussions to say English should be the national language, Democrats should hold discussions to say that climate change is the official belief of our country.

It is time to take this "discussion" to the next level and use examples like the "evidence" that there was a cover-up in Benghazi to discuss the use of "evidence" overall, and apply it to the most important topics of our current situation.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  the truly pathetic thing is (0+ / 0-)

    they don't really care about Benghazi or any of the other lame crap they try to attack Obama with... it's just about attacking Obama. there is zero substance to their attacks.

    if a Republican were still in power they wouldn't have even brought this up.

    •  Right... and (0+ / 0-)

      There are bound to be other mindless points made attacking Obama and the left on some other issue over the next few years.  The standard retort to them should be that  until they accept climate change--and our role in creating it--they have forfeited the right to meaningfully discuss any topic that involves evidence as a core component.  This isn't an academic discussion about whether the days are a little warmer than they were in the past--people are losing their lives and their livelihoods.  

      Politically, they should be told to get out of the way and whenever possible they should be worked around.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site