Skip to main content

This is election can be viewed from a number of angles.  One of them is that Americans pushed back against GOP overreach.


- Immigration and Latinos.  The entire GOP swerved even further to the right after McCain's defeat on immigration.  Romney buckled under to Rick Perry's primary challenge and went even more extreme.  ("self-deportation"?  Really?).  The result: (a) over a million more Latinos voted in 2012 (comprising 10% rather than 9% of the electorate) and they gave Obama something like a 71-21 lead.  The Latino vote was crucial in helping Obama win Colorado, Nevada, and (presumably) Florida (I-4 corridor)

(continued after the orange artwork of my daughter ;-)

- GOP stubbornness on auto-bailouts.  By 2010 the public was sick of hearing about, and turned against, anything that had the word "bailout" in it.  They made Obama "own" it (even though Bush started it!).  Obama himself didn't seem to embrace it until 2011.  What's so silly about this (in a "shoot yourself in the foot" kind of way) is that any president would have embraced it.  It had to be done.  The economy was cratering, and the auto industry and its ancillaries comprised a million American jobs.  That's why Bush started it.  (That's not to say anybody would have executed it well -- I think Obama did an exemplary job, by, e.g., getting steep CAFE increases -- but I do think that any president, GOP or Dem would have attempted some sort of bailout to save the industry).  Romney and the GOP took a craven view: to oppose it, which was the popular position in the short run.  The problem for the GOP, of course, is that the bailout worked.  Mr. Romney, the Dem "electors" (those who comprise the electoral vote) from Ohio thank you from the bottom of their hearts.

- GOP overreach in Ohio.  I can't say that the auto-bailout single-handedly tipped Ohio to Obama, because their was another factor: the severe anti-unionism of Ohio Gov Kasich.  The one-sided basic unfairness of what was known as SB-5 (anti-collective bargaining law) was an outrage, and woke Ohio and its unions up.  (Like of like placing a firecracker next to a sleeping bear).  The unions got a ballot referendum on SB-5 the following year, and last November, Ohio overturned the law by 61 to 39 percent (!!).  After the resounding victory, the unions just kept working straight through yesterday -- they kept all their infrastructure in place, and began working for the Dems and Obama.  This combination of union determination and Romney's "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt" is what sealed the deal for Ohio.

- Women's issues.  Not much needs to be said here.  Kinsley famously defined a "gaffe" as "when a politician reveals the truth (of what he believes) in a way that's politically harmful."  Todd Akin ("legitimate rape victims can't get pregnant"), and then a whole slew of other really stupid rape comments by GOP candidates, helped keep the women's vote 55-45 for Obama, as well as playing decisive roles in the sinking of GOP candidacies (McCaskill beating Akin and Donnelly beating Mourdock, are only two of the most visible examples).  Romney's "I want to shut down Planned Parenthood" played a significant hand in this, too.

- Voter suppression.  Florida's tea party-ish governor Rick Scott, and his GOP legislature, thought they had pulled a fast one -- by, essentially, outlawing early voting on Sundays -- the days when "Souls to the Polls" worked to get massive black churchgoing turnout.  The result was not what the GOP intended: black revulsion, leading to backlash, leading to determination more than ever to vote no matter what.  Why did folk stay in line last Saturday for seven hours?  Why -- when the polls closed at 7pm yesterday -- where there still voters standing in line waiting to vote at 11pm in a full 10% of the precincts in Miami-Dade?  In part, because they were determined to see that the GOP suppress the vote program was a miserable failure.

- Wisconsin.  The country's other extremist governor named Scott -- Scott Walker of Wisconsin -- similarly overreached.  On similar issues.  He and his GOP legislature pushed through draconian anti-union labor laws, as well as onerous voter ID laws (some of which were slapped down by the courts, and by public pressure).  When Walker won his recall election last June, most thought it portended a Wisconsin swing to the GOP.  But the GOP and the pundits read the cards wrong.  Many Wisconsinites simply didn't like the idea of a recall -- considering the election to be a sour-grapes "do-over" attempt -- particularly given that Walker's opponent in 2012 was the same opponent Walker defeated in 2010.  But, Wisconsinites didn't like the overreach, and, as in Ohio, unions were energized and worked unrelentingly to defeat Romney this fall.

- Tea Party extremist candidates.  Consider what the tea party has done: In 2010 Tea Party challengers in Delaware, Colorado and Nevada defeated more moderate GOP candidates, and replaced them with extremists (Christine O'Donnell, Ken Buck, and Sharron Angle), who each went on to lose to a vulnerable Dem Senator (including Harry Reid).  This year, the same thing happened with Mourdock (defeating Lugar) in red-Indiana (then losing to Donnelly), Todd Akin defeating Sarah Steelman (and going on to lose to McCaskill).  

(Tangent, as this isn't directly about the 2012 election) Ezra Klein notes:

But it’s not just that the Tea Party has been instrumental in helping Senate Democrats hold the majority necessary to protect Obamacare. It was the primary challenge against the late Sen. Arlen Specter that pushed the Pennsylvanian to switch parties, thus providing Democrats with the crucial 60th vote needed to break the Republican filibuster and pass health reform.

This is, in the end, likely to be the ironic legacy of the Tea Party and the tactics it chose: It arose in ferocious opposition to Obama’s agenda, but by driving Specter out of the party and pushing pure conservatives over more electable Republican candidates, it gave Senate Democrats the majorities they needed to pass and protect the key accomplishments of Obama’s presidency — and that’s before you get into whether the Tea Party’s influence in the Republican presidential primaries forced Mitt Romney to the right and gave Obama a crucial edge in a close presidential election.

Alll in all -- voters across American had a moderate and sensible reaction.  The GOP overreached and they became extreme, and the small "middle of the road" populace -- those few who still don't see themselves as supporting either party -- saw it for what it was: extremism and unfairness.  And they rejected it, and voted for Dems and to re-elect the President.

Thank you, America -- and to all those who contributed time or money to the campaigns!

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks, America (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Russ Jarmusch, Thinking Fella

    For voting moderate yesterday!

  •  But, what did we learn from 2010? (0+ / 0-)

    2008 was amazing, and we just gave up so much ground in the next two years.

    While I don't doubt people will agree 2012 was about slapping the GOP on the wrists for overreaching, I worry it's almost inevitable they will be saying 2014 was about punishing Dems for overreaching (or for still not getting enough done, if we're still totally obstructed).

    The media is just hooked on these narratives. CNN last night, when Obama was cruising to an Electoral College win but lagging in the popular vote, couldn't stop talking about how the lack of a mandate would make it impossible for Obama to govern. And when he led in the popular vote, they couldn't stop talking about how the senate is now more polarized and nothing really changed (or if it did change, it changed for the worse by cementing a more partisan landscape).

    The media can't wait to prop up the conservatives again, sending them to a great midterm election. I feel like they're already geared up to tell stories about us being punished in the midterms -- they just aren't sure yet whether it'll be because we aren't doing anything or because we did too much.

    •  The difference will be the economy (0+ / 0-)

      In 2014 the economy will be better, and a large part of Obamacare will be kicking in.  (Also, see

      Dems?  Overreach?  With a GOP House and a non-filibuster-proof Senate?  I don't see that happening.  (I think it could happen if it were possible, but there are too many GOP blocks in place to even let the Dems make such a move).

      •  Yes, Dems overreaching (0+ / 0-)

        Oh, it will be a major story.

        Not unlike how the public option quickly got taken off the table, we settled for a Republican version of health reform, and we still got tagged for a "government takeover" of healthcare. Sometimes you can't win for losing.

        Mark my words: they're going to make nine kinds of hay out of the push to change Senate rules to weaken the filibuster. Even if it doesn't come to pass, the fact that it'll be spoken about and considered will create a huge controversy about us overreaching and getting rid of traditions and rules so we can do whatever the hell we want.

        I fear it'll be sort of like the outrage Republicans tried to stir up regarding the "reconciliation" method used to pass healthcare. But unlike that one, this one probably sticks. Because most people didn't understand reconciliation at all, but everybody who passed 5th grade Social Studies can wrap their head around the filibuster.

        And with the 2014 Senate picture looking as friendly to the GOP as 2012 was supposed to be, it gives the Republican side some serious stakes for the midterms (as if they weren't excited enough to vote in midterms without having their votes drowned out by all the young people and minorities who are moved to vote when Obama's name is on a ballot).

  •  Florida's Gov is not a Walker (0+ / 0-)

    He's Rick Scott. Or Skeletor if you prefer.

  •  The true heroes of this election (0+ / 0-)

    are the voters of Florida. People standing in line for 9 (nine!) hours to vote, standing in line until after 11pm yesterday. Elderly, overwheight, whatever...

    I know that this year they were not the ones to swing the election, but it really doesn't matter. I guess everone in Florida learned the lesson the hard way in 2000 - every vote counts.

    And that is why Rick Scott's despicable vote suppression tactics didn't work- they don't work against an electorate determined enough.

    Florida truly needs and deserves a democratic governor. And I deliberately write that without a capital D. Whatever the party color it needs a governor that believes in and respects democracy - and last night Floridans also proved they truly deserve it.

    •  Yep (0+ / 0-) wife and I stood in line for 2 hours last Saturday. It was kind of amazing because NO ONE was leaving the line and it just kept getting bigger.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site