Skip to main content

Sean Trende has posted a new analysis on RealClearPolitics: The Case of the Missing White Voters. Warning: includes actual math to reach a conclusion quite different from what most pundits of both wings have been saying for the past day and a half.

Trende begins by pointing out similarities between the 2012 and the 2004 presidential elections:

George W. Bush won by 2.4 percent of the popular vote, which is probably about what Obama’s victory margin will be once all the ballots are counted. Republicans in 2004 won some surprising Senate seats, and picked up a handful of House seats as well. The GOP was cheered, claiming a broad mandate as a result of voters’ decision to ratify clear, unified Republican control of Congress and the presidency for the first time since 1928. As Bush famously put it, “I earned capital in the campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it.”

Democrats, like Republicans today, were despondent. Aside from having a president they loathed in the White House for four more years, they were terrified by what seemed to be an emerging Republican majority.

Pivoting to 2012, he writes:
For Republicans, that despair now comes from an electorate that seems to have undergone a sea change. In the 2008 final exit polls (unavailable online), the electorate was 75 percent white, 12.2 percent African-American, 8.4 percent Latino, with 4.5 percent distributed to other ethnicities. We’ll have to wait for this year’s absolute final exit polls to come in to know the exact estimate of the composition this time, but right now it appears to be pegged at about 72 percent white, 13 percent black, 10 percent Latino and 5 percent “other.”

Obviously, this surge in the non-white vote is troubling to Republicans, who are increasingly almost as reliant upon the white vote to win as Democrats are on the non-white vote. With the white vote decreasing as a share of the electorate over time, it becomes harder and harder for Republicans to prevail.

Then comes the big surprise. Trende crunches the numbers to reveal that even though there is a clear demographic trend in the direction of more minority voters, the 2012 results appear to have a different explanation entirely: Millions of white voters failed to turn out:
In other words, if our underlying assumption -- that there are 7 million votes outstanding -- is correct, then the African-American vote only increased by about 300,000 votes, or 0.2 percent, from 2008 to 2012. The Latino vote increased by a healthier 1.7 million votes, while the “other” category increased by about 470,000 votes.

This is nothing to sneeze at, but in terms of the effect on the electorate, it is dwarfed by the decline in the number of whites. Again, if our assumption about the total number of votes cast is correct, almost 7 million fewer whites voted in 2012 than in 2008.

It will be interested to see if and when this hits the pundit-o-sphere what they make of it. Trende's hypothesis boils down to "a pox on both your houses" due to negative advertising and lack of enthusiasm for either candidate.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Obama Amabo, nomandates
  •  Seven million fewer seems like B.S. A couple... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    General Hubbub, nomandates

    ...of million who were frustrated by having a nominated someone whom they felt was "not a real conservative" and a Mormon to boot, I'd believe.

    But I hope this meme catches on -- it will stoke the Teabaggers into believing they only lost because Mitt wasn't conservative enough.  And that will lead to the GOP civil war.

    NEW PALINDROMIC METAPHOR MEANING TO MAKE A PREDICTION THAT IS ASTOUNDINGLY OFF TARGET: "Pull a Gallup!" As in: "The weatherman said yesterday would be sunny and mild, but we got a foot of snow! Boy, did he pull a Gallup!"

    by Obama Amabo on Thu Nov 08, 2012 at 09:54:17 AM PST

    •  Seven million "feels" like a stretch, but (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Obama Amabo, nomandates

      it appears to be based on math that should hold up, if the assumption about overall count is more or less right and if the ethnic ratios don't change much in the final count. Trende's Ohio analysis is based on actual turnout data and agrees with his overall conclusion.

      As for GOP civil war, I, for one, hope it leads to a more moderate party that embraces math, science, and other reality-based notions.

  •  Some conservatives have suggested... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    General Hubbub, nomandates

    ... that evangelicals stayed home because Mitt didn't his Obama hard enough on abortion (Susan B Anthony List said this), leaving votes "on the table". Seems hard to fathom, but possible. The question is did Romney lose because there are fewer white people (yes) AND because many stayed home?

    The civil rights, gay rights and women's movements, designed to allow others to reach for power previously grasped only by white men, have made a real difference, and the outlines of 21st century America have emerged. -- Paul West of LA Times

    by LiberalLady on Thu Nov 08, 2012 at 11:50:42 AM PST

    •  The theory about evangelicals (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      nomandates

      doesn't make much sense to me. They got plenty of red meat from Romney-Ryan. I'm more inclined to believe that moderate working-class whites found it hard to identify with either candidate.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site