Skip to main content

Since 1990, the average life expectancy of a white woman without a HS diploma has fallen by 5 years. This nearly matches the catastrophic decline of 7 years' life expectancy in Russia since the fall of communism. The corresponding decline among white men without the HS diploma has been 3 years.
      These are the core of the people that Obama's Medicaid expansion was designed to save. These are the people that Republican governors wish to cast adrift without a lifeboat. These are also likely among those upon whom entitlement reform would fall most heavily.

In his blog of November 15, Krugman brought attention to an eye-opening article from September about the death toll extracted from uneducated whites by the health care mess and income inequality over the past 3 decades.

Researchers have long documented that the most educated Americans were making the biggest gains in life expectancy, but now they say mortality data show that life spans for some of the least educated Americans are actually contracting.
   Among the salient facts are that the life expectancy of a white woman without a HS diploma has fallen 5 years - the equivalent of returning to the life expectancies of 1960. The life expectancy for a white male w/o a HS diploma has dropped 3 years since 1990.
The latest estimate shows life expectancy for white women without a high school diploma was 73.5 years, compared with 83.9 years for white women with a college degree or more. For white men, the gap was even bigger: 67.5 years for the least educated white men compared with 80.4 for those with a college degree or better.

The dropping life expectancies have helped weigh down the United States in international life expectancy rankings, particularly for women. In 2010, American women fell to 41st place, down from 14th place in 1985, in the United Nations rankings. Among developed countries, American women sank from the middle of the pack in 1970 to last place in 2010, according to the Human Mortality Database.

The abstract for the underlying study ("Differences In Life Expectancy Due To Race And Educational Differences Are Widening") showed that racial disparities in life expectancy between whites and blacks have also generally widened, but not for one group. White women without a high school diploma now have a lower life expectancy than black (or Hispanic) women of the same educational level.

     One factor: 43% of whites with no diploma have no health insurance, compared to 35% in 1993. Another factor for women, incidence of smoking has increased in this group, for men it has declined. For both men and women obesity has risen - one of many reasons Obamacare stresses preventative medicine.

    When race and college education interact, the differences in health can be dramatic:

In 2008 white US men and women with 16 years or more of schooling had life expectancies far greater than black Americans with fewer than 12 years of education—14.2 years more for white men than black men, and 10.3 years more for white women than black women. These gaps have widened over time and have led to at least two “Americas,” if not multiple others, in terms of life expectancy, demarcated by level of education and racial-group membership. (from abstract)
(A new slogan? Get a college education to save your life.)

     So now a large group of Republican Governors wish to block implementation of Medicaid for person up to 133% of the poverty level. With American health care imitating the Russians for the uneducated, this is like stopping a Good Samaritan from throwing a life preserver to a woman overboard.

CALL TO ACTION
    Democrats and health professionals in the red states need to bring this outrage and scandal to the public's attention. Letters to the editor, social media, distribution of the NYTimes article, and more creative ways.
     It's not only a matter of humanity, it's a matter of math. After all citizens in these states will be paying all the same federal taxes as citizens where health care is provided. They just won't get their share of the money. Initially all and years down the road, 90% of the cost will be borne by the Feds. Economic studies show that the eventual 10% that the states will contribute will save more than those sums from state budgets in reducing their other health care costs.
     Unhealthy workers are unproductive workers. Given that you're already paying the taxes for this benefit, it supports the business community.
     It's needed to support the general health care community. Reimbursement schedules have been revised on the assumption that the number of unpaid services performed by hospitals will dramatically decline. If Medicaid is not paying for these patients many hospitals may hit a wall.

     Because of these financial issues for hospitals, there is also an appreciable chance that the Republican Governor's stance could have disastrous impact for those now on Medicare and Medicaid, as well as the health system generally. Many hospitals who serve patients through emergencies skate on thin ice as it is. This could very well be the tipping point to crash the system.
     (This is almost certainly why Gov. Scott of Florida is belatedly "trying to get to yes." He may be an ass, many of you think he is a crook, but he understands the basics of the economics of the health care system.)
      As Obamacare comes to the states and meets Republican obstruction on Medicaid expansion, I truly believe it has the potential as a wedge issue for Democrats. Although Democrats do better with whites without a diploma than whites with just a HS diploma, they lose lots of these votes and almost all of them (outside of Union members) in the South. Don't let them do this horrible deed in the dark, without paying a political price for it - particularly if it all blows up.

    In the afterglow of November 6th, it is easy to forget that we are heavy underdogs in 2014 and we have trojan's work to do to start recouping the losses of 2010. It's time to get started.

ON THE BUDGET FRONT

    This article dramatically illustrates why age adjustment of Medicare and Social Security payments is the absolute worst way to trim spending. It's like a means test in reverse. The well-educated, who have prospered in life continue to get the great bulk of their benefits, and those who need the benefits the most lose a big chunk of theirs. Rob from the poor and uneducated to secure the benefits of the well-educated.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Similar to Insurance actuaries Death Panels! (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    CuriousBoston, radarlady, antirove

    In a divided country, which we would become eventually if run by "State's Rights" disciples; with something like Obamacare those states who chose to take part would actually benefit financially,(Short Term), from the taxes paid by those who "Opt-Out".
    How can Governor Walker decline to become a part of this historic piece of legislation at the expense of every person living in his State? Surely something such as this should not be left to a man who wasn't elected because of his position on this issue and just as surely this one individual should not have the right to decide something as far-reaching; based on his philosophical differences with the party who enacted the legislation.
    In a couple of years, the benefits of belonging to such a large and influential purchasing block might even raise our status to the level of health care enjoyed by every Federal employee, Federal elected officeholder and their staff as well as the coverage enjoyed by State Governors and elected State official. All subsidized by the taxpayer.
    This means Mr. Walker is not touched by his intransigence concerning his decision not to take part in Obamacare. HE"S COVERED and YOU'RE NOT!

    "If you tell the truth, you won't have to remember anything", Mark Twain

    by Cruzankenny on Sat Nov 17, 2012 at 02:33:09 PM PST

  •  Working class women may need scholarship help (0+ / 0-)

    and perhaps tutoring in order to finish GED and perhaps go on to 1 or 2 year or 4 year degree post-high school.  Certainly some sort of direct face to face contact with these women is needed to make clear they have some open doors and paths to life-improving education, that it is worth it for them, and that they are worth the investment effort.

    Congress and President Obama helped secure some new education funding for college students with Pell Grants and changes to student loan programs.  We need to see something done to make pre-college education more accessible and attractive to these women, offered at times they can attend, and easily afforded.  Their struggle with pride and self-esteem may lead them to skip taking care of themselves and their futures by improving their education. We need to make sure throughout school that girls and young women get the message while still in school that every one of them is worth educating, and can complete High School and/or their GED, and go on to pursue at least a 1 or 2 year Associate's Degree and qualify for jobs which pay enough to sustain themselves. Just because you're not a Rhodes Scholar doesn't mean you should give up learning a useful degree or trade, and have a good understanding of our civilization and a voice in our democratic society.

    Encouraging these women to quit smoking will be good for their finances, their own health, and any children they may have. Getting emphysema or cancer mid-life would certainly exhaust any savings or equity they might have slowly built up, and bankrupt them, which adversely affects any family they may have been trying to raise, leading to more homelessness and struggle just to survive. Apparently, merely raising taxes on cigarettes has not been a sufficient disincentive to get them to quit.  We need to review how cigarette makers have been getting their message to these women to take up smoking and terminate that.  It's a matter of public health, since it affects families and children, as well as protecting their personal health.

    When life gives you wingnuts, make wingnut butter!

    by antirove on Sun Nov 18, 2012 at 11:11:10 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site