Skip to main content

A couple of good recent diaries have highlighted a subject that has been near to my heart for years now.  Through no real fault of their own, many (most) people on both the right and the left have a basic misconception about how a progressive tax system operates.   People routinely confuse the highest marginal rate with the “effective” rate, (i.e. the percentage of one’s total income paid in tax), and therefore overestimate how much they are paying and actually fear moving into a higher bracket.  

This misconception has been fostered and encouraged by the anti-tax crowd, aided by the cluelessness of most of the media.  High on progressives’ to-do list should be a serious media campaign to educate the public on how marginal rates work.  I firmly believe that such a campaign done well, including some slick TV ads, would greatly increase public support for progressive tax policy.  

See more below.  

The tax rate you most often hear mentioned in the media is the highest marginal tax rate.  Listen carefully, everybody:  the highest marginal rate does NOT, repeat NOT, apply to your entire income.  It applies only to the amount earned above the kick-in threshold.  

Brainwrap provides an excellent explanation of this, with examples:

See also Jed Lewison:

The misunderstanding of this simple point has been one of the primary barriers to public acceptance of a progressive tax system.  The anti-tax crowd foments this misunderstanding since it serves their purposes.  They would like you to believe that you might wind up working harder and keeping less money because you move into a higher bracket.  This is totally bogus.  It simply cannot happen because of how marginal rates operate.  

If you were not aware of this, don’t feel bad.  I make this point whenever the subject comes up and I find the misunderstanding to be rampant in every political, social, economic, and educational demographic.  

The top marginal rate is not the same as the “effective” rate, which is the percentage of your total income that you pay in tax.  You can calculate your effective Federal income tax rate very easily.  Simply pull out your 2011 1040 return (I hope you saved a copy) and go to line 61 on page 2, which shows your “total tax.”  Divide this number by line 37 on page 1, your “adjusted gross income,” then multiply by 100 to convert to a percentage.  If you used the 1040EZ form, divide line 10 by line 6.  

My effective Federal tax rate last year was 21.8 percent, and I am in a comfortable two-income household; we are probably in the top two-percent.  When I ask people to estimate how much of their income they are paying in Federal income tax, they invariably guess a third or more.  I suspect only a tiny percentage are actually paying an effective rate higher than 22 percent and most are paying considerably less. *  

The other side doesn’t want people to understand how taxes work.  They are delighted to have people overestimating how much Federal income tax they pay.  They benefit from the fear people have that they could lose money by moving into a higher bracket, even though this fear is illusory. If our side wants to increase public support for a fair progressive tax system, we need to educate people on this point.  

I can’t think of a better use for our side’s financial resources right now than to embark on a sophisticated media campaign just to make the point that these top marginal rates only apply to the top segment of one’s earnings.   A few well-crafted TV spots by the folks who brought us Obama’s ads could surely make the point, and could help us solidify a strong majority for the goals of progressive government.  

*(There are, of course, payroll, state, and local taxes.  But the issue of the moment is the progressivity of the Federal income tax system.  That's what the "fiscal cliff" negotiations are all about.  If you want to determine your full effective tax rate, add your payroll, state, and local taxes to Federal and divide by adjusted gross income.)  

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  There were some attempts (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    palantir, MiyukiMiyazaki

    during the campaign not to explain this exactly, but I remember the president and others saying something like taxes won't go up on the first 250K you earn, but only on what you earn above 250k. Unfortunately, it is impossible to explain marginal tax rates in a soundbite driven media. We train people to stop listening after 15 seconds, then deplore (or exploit) their ignorance. What a world.

  •  I explain (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    avsp, disinterested spectator, ferg

    I explain that to all my tax clients.  Even after telling people:  Look -- after all your deductions, you're actually paying $0 in income taxes......

    They complain about how high their taxes are.  

    People like to complain about high taxes just because they like to complain about high taxes.

  •  I would donate some money to that campaign. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Another Grizzle

    Good idea.

  •  Education will be a key to demystifying taxation. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Another Grizzle

    When I was a child, the illusion was how it 'seemed' to me.
    Then I got older, but it took some digging to make this determination. It wasn't a topic in civics in school either.

    I started working early and by then, I knew I was not going to be penalized if I got a raise. I've never been able to adequately make most people with whom I discuss this understand easily. It's as if they firmly believe if they make 5,000 more, they'll lose more than they gain with a higher income if it hits a new bracket.

    I think this, in part, is why some people gripe about lower wages, but still tend to accept them because they fear working more for less. It's incorrect thinking, but it keeps some from doing more for themselves because they don't understand taxation properly.

    -6.38, -6.21: Lamented and assured to the lights and towns below, Faster than the speed of sound, Faster than we thought we'd go, Beneath the sound of hope...

    by Vayle on Tue Nov 20, 2012 at 08:13:16 AM PST

  •  Thanks for the shout-out; I've reposted the diary (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Another Grizzle

    ...this morning with a few minor tweaks; would appreciate it if you could change the link to the new version:

    Much obliged!

  •  I'm constantly shouting this at the television or (0+ / 0-)

    tweeting it like mad to the MSM talking heads.

    They are complicit in not using the correct terminology: perputating on a daily basis simplistic and infuriatingly misleading:  "people making over $250,000"  as opposed to "INCOME over $250,000."

    If the plutocrats begin the program, we will end it. -- Eugene Debs.

    by livjack on Tue Nov 20, 2012 at 08:36:01 AM PST

  •  While We are Educating People: WHY Progressive Tax (0+ / 0-)

    You are absolutely correct that we need to explain this basic fact about progressive taxation to people. But be ready for the next question: Why do we need a progressive tax system?  or Is that fair?

    What we need to show people is that a flat tax is NOT FAIR.  There are a multitude of reasons and reasonable people will listen to that and eventually agree in most cases that progressive taxation is indeed the way things should be.

    I find a lot of traction with Republicans that will listen when I explain that rich people do indeed get MORE from the government than poor people do.  When I talk in those terms, it is as if I am revealing something completely new to them.  But when they listen they seem to go away with a much more enlightened view of taxes in general.

    Science attempts to answer WHAT. Religion contemplates WHY. Politics settles for WHO CARES.

    by nuketeacher on Tue Nov 20, 2012 at 09:55:32 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site