Skip to main content

Those of you that read this regular series know that I am from Hackett, Arkansas, just a mile or so from the Oklahoma border, and just about 10 miles south of the Arkansas River.  It was a rural sort of place that did not particularly appreciate education, and just zoom onto my previous posts to understand a bit about it.

Several folks who follow this regular series, my Pique the Geek one, and my Popular Culture one know that I often use obsolete or archaic spellings for certain, common words.  This is intentional.

Perhaps it is no longer standard English to use these old words, but neither is it incorrect to do so.  I do so partly out of respect whence came I ("whence" is "from where" in a single word, so if you say "from whence" it is sort of like saying "from from where", sort like folks calling MSDSs "Material Data Safety Sheet Sheets" when they say "MSDS sheets"), but I am not being completely honest.

Another reason that I use them is to try to grab the attention of my readers.  I find it interesting to read pieces from contributors who are sort of off the beaten track.  I do not know if it works well for me or not.  I do believe that my readers realize that I do this not out of ignorance for standard English, but sort of in protest of the conformity to it.

Am I an nonconformist?  As Gibbs would say, "Ya think!?"

Following is a list of words that I often use that are not standard, but not incorrect, and then some recollections that I have for some of the old talk that NEVER was really correct.  This is quite subjective, but here we go.

I often the words "burnt", "learnt", "boilt", and several others in place of "burned", "learned", "boiled", and so forth.  There is an extremely technical reason for this as one examines the evolution of the English tongue.  Here is the diluted version.

At one time, especially going back the the Anglo-Saxon versions of English, there were many classes of verbs, described by how they were conjugated.  In modern usage, there are only really three now:  weak verbs, strong verbs, and irregular verbs.  This terminology is pretty much based on modern German, but I think that it jibes well with modern English.  (Interestingly, many people use the word "jives", meaning to dance or talk in a particular manner, with "jibes", meaning to agree with other things, but I digress again.)

Weak verbs use a stem that is unchanging and then applies suffixes to denote their temporal meaning.  English is unique that it forms the infinitive of the verb by adding, of all things, the preposition "to" to the fleshed out stem.  Here are two common examples.   These examples are only for the indicative mood of the verb.  The imperative and subjective are sometimes different.

"To dance" is the infinitive.  Let us look at how we change the verb to match the temporal sense.

Present simple first person singular:  "I dance."
Present simple second person singular:  "You dance."
Present simple third person singular:  "He dances."

The only change is the added s in the third person singular.

Present progressive first person singular:  "I am dancing."
Present progressive second person singular:  "You are dancing.
Present progressive third person singular:  "She is dancing."

The only change is dropping the "e" and replacing it with "ing", typical of forming the progressive.

Present emphatic first person singular:  "I do dance."
Present emphatic second person singular:  "You do dance."
Present emphatic third person singular:  "He does dance."

There is no change to "dance", but like in the progressive there is an axillary verb that is sort of hard to define, but we will get to it.

This is going to become exponentially large if I go into so much detail, so let us sort of condense it.  The simple past tense of "to dance" is "danced".  In this case it is also the past participle.  The only change is to replace "e" with "ed".  The stem of the verb is completely unchanged.

The future tense in English is usually formed by using the auxiliary verbs "will" or "shall" (interestingly, there are no infinitives that use the adjective "to" for either of those!).  I think of them more as adverbs, but those are some fine hairs to split.

The point is that with weak verbs, the stem does not change, only what can be called suffixes.  Now for strong ones.

Strong verbs have a sound shift in the stem.  This is usually only apparent in the simple past tenses, but these verbs are so common that it is possible to sound quite ignorant if one uses them incorrectly.  Here is a common example.

"To sing" is the infinitive.  All of the present and future tenses are derived just like weak verbs.  But the simple past tenses are quite different.

"I sing" means that either I am singing at present or that I can sing.
"I sang" indicates that I recently sang something or that used to be activity that I pursued.
"I sung" is quite incorrect.  To use "sung" correctly, unless it is the surname of Data's creator, requires an auxillary verb that indicates the past, like "have".  "I have sung" is right, but "I sung" is right out for correct usage.

There are many verbs like that, some of them extremely common.  Exampled include "to see", "to fly", and any number of verbs.  Misuse of the past participles of these verbs is often the quickest way to determine the educational level of a person.  I cringe when I hear people say things like, "I seen that" or "He done that".  This is not always in indicator of education, but is strongly associated with education.

In my little town most people did not know how to conjugate verbs very well.  This included a number of teachers at the school.  Sometimes I wonder how I learnt to do so properly.  In large measure is was because of my mum.  Although she did not have college, other than some business school, she was extremely well read.  I can remember only a handful of instances where she messed up, and almost all of those were isolated incidents.  Everyone makes mistakes from time to time.  As I was growing up, she would gently correct me when I said things incorrectly.  My parents also bought books for me and encouraged me to read widely, a skill that has served me well.  I still have a near mint set of Encylpaedia Britannica, 1957 edition, that my parents bought when I was born.  I had begun reading it before I turned six, but of course did not understand much of it because it was way over my age level.

Reading does something to the mind of a child.  It forms connexions that otherwise would not exist, and I truly believe that, all things equal, adds intelligence points to children.  My friend has a little girl, and I always give her a Little Golden Book for Christmas and on her birthday.  The Color Kittens is still a classic, and I remember it extremely well from my own childhood.  I prefer spending money on things like that for her than the commercialized crap covered with images of Dora the Explorer, although those do have some educational value.  Interestingly, many of her Dora books have torn or missing pages, but all of The Little Golden Books that I have given her are unscathed.

The last kind of verbs that I shall address tonight are ones that are completely irregular.  The one that comes immediately to mind is "to be".  This verb is completely irregular in English, and as far as I have been able to tell, in all Indo-European tongues.

"I am"
"You are"
"She is"
"We are"
"You are"
"They are"
"I have been" and so forth.

In the Anglo-Saxon there was a forth number, the dual.  It is sort of like the modern plural, but has the special meaning, roughly, of "you and I".  English used to have, and German and French still have, the familiar form of the second person.  In English, even with our closest ones, use "you" as a form of address to another individual.  In German there is the formal address, "Sie" equivalent to the English "you".  But for loved ones, children, and pets the Germans tend to use the pronoun "du", showing closeness or familiarity.  We used to do this in English and it is still proper, but hardly ever used except when reading Shakespeare or the King James edition of the Bible.  That word is "thou".  It is remarkably cognate with "du" as in English "th" often replaces "d".

As an aside, there is an extremely common contraction that even the most well-educated people use that is quite incorrect.  We often say, "...aren't I?".  That is just wrong, and even the least language savvy person rarely says "I are..."!  The proper usage is "am not", but I have never seen the contraction "...amn't I?" used.  I sort of like that, and may begin to use it.

Now back to why I choose to use some of the words that I use.  First, note that I use the word connexion for connection.  That is sort of a Brit thing (I used to go so far as to spell things like "colour", "odour", and "centre" in the Brit fashion but have broken myself from that pretty much) and is also a near obsolete way to spell the word.  But near obsolete does not make it incorrect.

At one time the proper way to form many past participles was to add "t" rather than "ed" to many words.  Hence, "boilt" was quite proper for a long, long time but has now been replaced with "boiled" almost completely.  This is because of the nature of English.  Our language has a very long history of evolving from a very rigid, highly inflected one to a very fluid, noninflected one.  This trend is towards uniformity in treating all parts of speech in a manner that simplifies things.  This trend also is manifest in the elimination of grammatical gender in English.  French and Spanish, along with many other languages, retain gender for inanimate objects (in those cases either feminine or masculine, with different articles for each) and German retains all three Indo-European genders, including neuter, again with different articles.

Along with the trend towards simplification in English, strong verbs are becoming weak ones (but this if far from complete), suffixes that denote the intention of nouns (and their articles and adjectives) have been replaced with the ordering of the words, and lots of unnecessary rigidity has been eliminated.  However, English DOES retain lots of strong verbs and the few irregular ones, and the use of those verbs properly says quite a lot about the education of the speaker or writer.

In any event, I write the way that I write because I like doing it.  I also think that it adds a bit of distinction to my work, be it for good or ill.  Certainly I make mistakes (I am very prone to typographical errors, since my only editor that I have is my audience) and try to correct them when I see them or when they are pointed out to me.  But I shall continue to say "learnt" or "spoilt" as I see fit.

As another aside, earlier today I was visiting my neighbors (The Girl is out of town) because they are my friends.  The Girl is not the only reason why I spend time there, you see.  Anyway, I was repairing the controller for lift chair that The Girl's mum uses (the cable leading to the control unit had become frayed) and once finished put the control unit on the floor where the epoxy putty that I used as part of the repair could cure.  I said, "I am going to put this down here so it will not be molested until the epoxy cures".  My neighbor laughed at my choice of words and said something to the effect that I always use interesting language.  I took that as a compliment.

Tonight I have a chicken with onion, celery, carrot, garlic, bay leaves, salt and pepper, and some spices in the stockpot.  Tomorrow I shall use my grandmum's recipe to make chicken and dressing for Thanksgiving.  That is all that I plan on doing for Thanksgiving, since I shall be quite alone for most of the day.  However, I shall send some of the dressing with my neighbors to take to one of their other daughters' house for them to have the feast.  In return, The Girl's mum promised to bring a plate back for me of the other food.  Actually, I am making enough dressing for two batches, because they plan on having their own Thanksgiving dinner next week and I am invited, just sort of a close family dinner.  I am honored to be included on the guest list, which is extremely short.  Everyone has agreed that regardless of how the relationship with The Girl goes, I have a surrogate family now.  So I have something for which to give thanks this year, and in a big way.

In a while I shall pull the chicken pieces out of the stock and let them cool enough to bone.  Then the bone and skin goes back into the pot and I shall reduce the stock until I am happy with it.  I shall use the white meat for the dressing and make chicken and dumplings with the remainder of the stock with the dark meat.  I am guest hosting Whats for Dinner? on 20121201 and plan (if all goes well) to include a photoessay about the dressing and the dumplings.  Otherwise, I shall write about the nutritional value of tree nuts.

I wish each and every one of you a very happy Thanksgiving!  Try to share it with loved ones if at all possible.  If not, and if you are able, then do something for someone.  I promise you that you will feel better about yourself for that.

Warmest regards,

Doc, aka Dr. David W. Smith

Crossposted at

The Stars Hollow Gazette,

Docudharma, and

firefly-dreaming

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tips and recs for (16+ / 0-)

    remembering distant memories?

    Warmest regards,

    Doc

    I would rather die from the acute effects of a broken heart than from the chronic effects of an empty heart. Copyright, Dr. David W. Smith, 2011

    by Translator on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 06:00:30 PM PST

  •  Hangby (7+ / 0-)

    I first heard this word in northwest Arkansas as a kid.  Used by one of my grandparents.  I knew the person being referred to and understood what was meant just from the context of the comment.  Later on, I inherited a dictionary printed in the 1800s, and the word was in it.

    Hangby means a person who is dependent on others, tending to be shiftless and unwilling to fend for himself (or herself).  It is a term of contempt.  Probably more likely to be applied to a male than female, especially in the eighteenth and nineteenth century.

    The general who wins the battle makes many calculations in his temple before the battle is fought. The general who loses makes but few calculations beforehand. - Sun Tzu

    by Otteray Scribe on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 06:17:23 PM PST

    •  I like that word! (6+ / 0-)

      I get its derivation, from "hanging by" someone who would provide for her or him.  Now, as Paul Harvey used to say, for the rest of the story.

      Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain) was notorious for that.  He would go visit people, sometimes for weeks or months, and contribute essentially nothing economically.  But the hapless hosts would have to feed and provide provisions not only for him, but also for the crowds that showed up to get a chance to rub elbows with him.

      I hope that your Thanksgiving is a happy one, my dear friend!

      Warmest regards,

      Doc

      I would rather die from the acute effects of a broken heart than from the chronic effects of an empty heart. Copyright, Dr. David W. Smith, 2011

      by Translator on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 06:21:11 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  That's a good word-- :) (5+ / 0-)

      I just tried to look it up...to no avail...
      so I'm wondering about pronunciation.

      Would that be -by, as in buy or bye,
      or does it sound like "be"?

      I'm guessing the first:  bye, but one never knows, eh?

      And by the by, OS, wishing you
      Peace and Blessings this Thanksgiving.

      •  That is an excellent question, (5+ / 0-)

        and one for which I have no answer.  I shall root around a bit.

        Warmest regards,

        Doc

        I would rather die from the acute effects of a broken heart than from the chronic effects of an empty heart. Copyright, Dr. David W. Smith, 2011

        by Translator on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 06:29:09 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  Pronounce: HANG-bye (5+ / 0-)

        the suffix is "by" as in "beside" or "next to."

        And thank you very much.  It will be quiet here.  My youngest daughter who lives with me will be at work.  Law enforcement does not get to close, ever.  So, I will watch a ball game, use the computer, and work on a model airplane in the workshop.  I am not about to cook.  I will go to the cemetery and sit a spell.

        The general who wins the battle makes many calculations in his temple before the battle is fought. The general who loses makes but few calculations beforehand. - Sun Tzu

        by Otteray Scribe on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 06:38:37 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  That explanation makes sense. Hang By. (4+ / 0-)

          It doesn't sound like much of a holiday for you,
          but I hope you find the day to be peaceful,
          and restful.  

          Take care--

        •  You shall also go into my thoughts, (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          arizonablue, Otteray Scribe

          as a wonderful, kind, and considerate person.  Please observe an old tradition when you go!  Set a coin onto where their breasts would be, on top of the ground.  A one cent piece is fine.  It is not the value of the coin, but the meaning of the gesture.  Then tell them that the coin is just a token of your feelings.

          This tradition dates back to about two minutes ago, and I just thought it up for you.  However, I think that it might have meaning, and I shall do the same the next time I visit my parents' resting place.

          Please call me after noon or so!  I need not to be alone later.  The melatonin is working well now, and I have only about five minutes left.  It has changed my life, for the better.

          I care very, very much about you, my friend!

          Your friend,

          David

          I would rather die from the acute effects of a broken heart than from the chronic effects of an empty heart. Copyright, Dr. David W. Smith, 2011

          by Translator on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 10:44:32 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  Throw a Nickle on the Grass is an old figher pilot (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Translator, trillian

            tradition.  The ceremony is sometimes held by friends and family after the burial ceremony.  This song is by folk singer Oscar Brand who recorded several tribute songs for pilots.

            This video shows an actual ceremony.  Pilots being who they are, it is about as informal as anything you will ever see in a cemetery.

            The general who wins the battle makes many calculations in his temple before the battle is fought. The general who loses makes but few calculations beforehand. - Sun Tzu

            by Otteray Scribe on Thu Nov 22, 2012 at 06:05:40 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

  •  I've often thought that English needs a word (6+ / 0-)

    for You, plural, like e.g., the Spanish Ustedes.
    Of course the South has y'all, but that has never caught
    on here.

    Here in my part of the country, one has somewhat evolved:
    younze, or yinz....depending on if you're 50 miles north or
    south.

    Most interesting is the pronunciation of some of the
    elders, especially if they are the children of European
    immigrants.  They use this combined form, that sounds
    like this:   boat younze, as in---

    "Boat younze kids get down offa that roof!"

  •  Happy Thanksgiving Doc! (4+ / 0-)

    and to all the denizens and readers of My Little Town.

  •  Happy Thanksgiving David (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Translator, frosti, arizonablue

    For an interesting look (or should I say 'a hear') at the pronunciation of words, consider the various performances of "Messiah." When I was younger, the standard practice for singing the word, "Turned" ("All We Like Sheep") was to pronounce it as two strong syllables to match the music. I always found that a bit pompous but assumed that it was authentic, so there.

    But Christopher Hogwood and The Academy of Ancient Music's recording - which is about as period-appropriate as one is going to get - almost pronounces the word "Turned" as one syllable.

    best,

    john

    Strange that a harp of thousand strings should keep in tune so long

    by jabney on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 07:49:44 PM PST

  •  My aunt who taught HS English (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Translator, arizonablue

    researched methods of teaching grammar and rhetoric.  This program was used in my Jr. HS classes, and hence I never learned proper terms for some parts of speech until I took German.  The thought at University of Oregon was that people had a natural ear for language and would not be prone to mistakes.  This was during those radical 70's.

    The odd thing was, English teachers assumed I knew her grammar since I was related to her (as if grammar is an heritable trait).  In 8th grade I and 2 other friends were assigned the task of teaching the other 8th grade honors students this unusual grammar based on mathematics, as the 8th grade teacher did not know it at all.  It was very embarrassing to be singled out in this manner.

  •  Happy Thanksgiving, David (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Translator, arizonablue

    It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Thoreau

    by newpioneer on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 09:38:55 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site