Skip to main content

Original Article HERE.

Is Grover Norquist losing his grip on the Republican Party? Watching him on the different television networks would lead one to that conclusion. If you have to explain why you are still powerful or relevant then you are neither powerful nor relevant.

Grover Norquist is the founder of Americans for Tax Reform that he claims was at the request of President Reagan. The organization coerces Republican candidates to sign the Taxpayer Protection Pledge in which they promise to oppose all tax increases.

It seems that many of the Republicans that signed the pledge are starting to realize that their “anti-tax increase” position is neither rational nor sustainable. The following statements from several prominent Republican politicians were reported in an AP story on Huffington Post.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (AL) - "Oh, I signed it," . - . "But we've got to deal with the crisis we face. We've got to deal with the political reality of the president's victory."

Sen. Bob Corker (TN) - says the only pledge he will keep is his oath of office.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (VA) says no one in his home state of Virginia is talking about what leaders in Washington refer to simply as "The Pledge,"

Sen. Saxby Chambliss (GA) says he cares more about his country than sticking to Norquist’ s pledge.

House Speaker John Boehner (OH) has called that notion unrealistic and has dismissed Norquist as "some random person."

Rep. Peter King (NY) told NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday that the pledge is good for a two-year term only. .-. "For instance, if I were in Congress in 1941, I would have signed a support of declaration of war against Japan. I'm not going to attack Japan today. The world has changed, and the economic situation is different."

Sen. John McCain (AZ), "Fewer and fewer people are signing this, quote, pledge,"

Grover Norquist has resorted to reminding every Republican politician that President George H. W. Bush lost the election when he broke the pledge by working with Democrats to raise taxes. Savvy politicians may be coming to the realization that there were many factors instrumental in that loss that had nothing to do with breaking the pledge. Breaking the pledge was just one factor. An analysis worth reading can be found in this Jim Buie’s Blog post.

One can conclude that if a broken pledge results in a vibrant economy and the reelection of the majority of the Republican politicians, Grover Norquist stranglehold will cease. With that the American Tax Reform organization will be irrelevant.

It has always been surprising that signing this pledge was never attacked effectively by the left for being an irresponsible and unpatriotic act. It is a pledge that is completely causal of our budget deficit. After-all, there is no pledge that Republicans have signed to curtail spending as a function of diminished collected revenues. As such implicit within that pledge is codified deficit spending. Moreover, since interest is paid on the debt, since the debt is held mostly by those with means, since tax increases are prohibited, and since tax cuts are encouraged, the pledge is one of the mechanism that have transferred the nation’s wealth from the middle class to the wealthy.

There should no longer be disagreement on these issues as one can research past economic charts as a function of policies in effect. They clearly show a wealth transfer. While there is great income disparity as well, other policies are responsible.

As Grover Norquist become more irrelevant, it will leave room for politicians to compromise. It will also allow Republicans to inject morality in their tax policy choices for those that are inclined to do so.

LIKE My Facebook Page

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site