Skip to main content

There's been a lot of talk of accelerating the timeline to get out of Afghanistan. Even conservatives are openly talking about it.  I started thinking about what ending the war actually means. We don't really have much history in terms of ending these conflicts. Well, the conflicts end, but the troops seem to stay. For example, we still have more than 52,000 troops stationed in Germany and 32,000 stationed in Japan. You might remember us beating both of those countries in a little conflict known as World War 2.

Somewhat more defensible are the almost 29,000 troops we still have in South Korea. But think about that for a minute. The Korean War ended in 1953, and WWII ended in 1945. There may be some sensible reason for a limited U.S. presence in South Korea right now. But 29,000 troops -- almost half of what we have in Afghanistan -- just to have on hand in case their lunatic northern neighbor ever gets its hands on a rocket that actually works? That seems to be a stretch. And through that lens let's go back to the 52,000 -- fifty-two thousand?! -- troops in Germany? Who do they have upstairs? The Dutch? Denmark? Or are we still pretending that the single major Eurozone nation enjoying any kind of financial stability is itching to start itself an awesome new round of world wars? I guess we must be, because otherwise, over 75% of the number of troops required to carry on our one active/official international conflict looks like something between overkill and straight-up idiocy.

Last December, the last U.S troops left Iraq. So that's at least one war that ended without us leaving tens of thousands of troops behind for one reason or another. Of course, that wasn't for lack of trying. The plan was to leave a "small" force of maybe 10,000 troops for training and security purposes. They just couldn't make a deal. That leads us to Afghanistan.

Currently, we have approximately 66,000 troops in Afghanistan. That's down from a high of 100,000 during the so-called surge.  Each of those soldiers costs between $815,000 and $1.4 million per year to keep on the ground -- only a tiny fraction of which goes to actual salary and benefits. Of course, that's all good to the DoD -- if it's up to them, we'll never leave.  When asked about troop levels in post war in Afghanistan, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said:

It’s entirely premature to speculate on troop numbers in Afghanistan between now and the end of 2014 or beyond,” he said. “In September, we completed the full withdrawal of the 33,000 surge troops, and we will soon begin considering how we move forward on further troop level adjustments which will include planning for our post-2014 military and civilian presence in Afghanistan."
Whenever I hear about all of this debt ceiling nonsense, I think about the fact that we have almost 11,000 troops stationed in Italy --  another of the axis powers we defeated around the Truman administration.  I assume we aren't waiting for Mussolini's corpse to reanimate and raise an army. I can't think of a good reason for us to still be there.  Not in those numbers anyway.

I know it's not quite as simple as just deciding to bring all of the troops home and then having it instantly done.  And even I can come up with some compelling reasons to have some troops stationed around the world.  But come on! They haven't figured out exactly how many troops are going to be left in our latest war that never ends but we're talking about cutting entitlements for seniors and the poor. Maybe if we weren't subsidizing the armies of other countries abroad, we'd have more money for the things we need at home.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site