Skip to main content

Talk, talk, talk endlessly about the fiscal cliff -- it's diarrhea.  But the clear situation is there will be NO DEAL and tax rates will go up on everybody on January 1st.  This is obvious because the House Republicans who were frequently elected with substantial margins (due to redistricting) cannot vote in large enough numbers to a get deal that involves increasing tax rates on the rich. The only way a deal can be reached is if President Obama took increasing tax rates for the rich off the table; however, the re-elected President is sticking to his pledge to let the Bush tax cuts expire on the rich.

The President's line in the sand is there can be no negotiations until the Republicans agree to increase the tax rates on the rich and offer specific spending cuts of their own.  This implies the President realizes there will be no deal without the cliff rolling back the Bush tax rates; he has no allusions that Republicans will do the right thing pre cliff.

It is better politically for everybody to go over the cliff and let the Bush tax rates expire. This is the only way Democrats are going to get the increase tax rates on the rich.  This is why going over the cliff is being endorsed by the likes of Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, and other conservatives.  But in any case, most everybody is for going over the cliff even though few will say it out loud.  After the cliff the Republicans will pretend they are the ones to restore lower taxes on the middle class, and Democrats will celebrate increased tax rates on the rich.

Markets may start to weigh in on the cliff before the end of the year, and this could shake the politicians up a bit.  But it will take multiple -500 Dow days to get their attention and/or talk about further reductions in the US credit rating.  But even this will likely not budge the debate.

The consensus is now for cliff diving.  So, enjoy the holidays -- this will resume in January, perhaps not until the Inauguration and the new Congress.


Will US go over fiscal cliff?

88%22 votes
8%2 votes
4%1 votes
0%0 votes

| 25 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Where is the option for (0+ / 0-)

    both sides will cave? It's hard to see how you ever make any kind of deal unless both sides give some ground.

    Also it's not strictly speaking accurate to say that Republicans won't agree to increase taxes on the rich. Taxes on the rich are going up all by themselves on January 1. It would take Democrats agreeing to extend those tax cuts for the rates to stay the same. The only item on the table as far as tax rates is whether to prevent taxes from going up on the 98%. For that to happen, the House will have to refuse to vote on a bill the Senate has already passed to extend the Bush tax cuts on the 98%. That puts the Republicans in a bit more of a bind than the suggestion that Republicans need to agree to increase taxes on the rich. Actually, they don't have to agree to that at all.

  •  There are a lot worse fates than going back to (0+ / 0-)

    the Clinton Budget.
    And staying there for about 8 years, sans wars.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site