Skip to main content

Could a shock jock who routinely plays "Barack the Magic Negro" on his talk show, and who once told a black caller to "take that bone out of your nose" have anything worthwhile to contribute about race? Not likely.

Rush Limbaugh (December 3, 2012):
"Planned Parenthood is all about family planning.
Yeah, but not the kind you're thinking about.
It's called the elimination of black families."
Limbaugh's racial pronouncements are calculated and blatantly political. Liberals and progressives tend to support Margaret Sanger's ideas about women's rights and birth control. Thus, Rush has declared, "Margaret Sanger wanted to rid the world of black people. It's called Planned Parenthood today, and they're still trying to do it."

Rush Limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh: a racist attributing not just racism, but a willingness to commit genocide to his political foes. His goal is driving a wedge between Dems and one of their most loyal constituencies. Of course Limbaugh's racism alienates many who might otherwise give credence to his preposterous claims. But such false ideas find fertile ground among right wing hatemongers.

more Rush, and racism, and Planned Parenthood,
and Margaret Sanger (and Ann Coulter!) after the jump

Much (but not all) of Limbaugh's racism is aimed at President Obama:


Limbaugh has always described President Obama in the most objectionable language he can muster. For example, Limbaugh has said that Obama is prejudiced, inauthentic, a black flag waving radical extremist, an empty canvas, very scary, race-baiting and fearmongering, and worthy of ridicule. Limbaugh has characterized Obama speeches as "shuckin' and jivin'" while accusing him of being "too black". Limbaugh has also droned incessantly about Obama not being black enough.

(More Limbaugh vs. Obama, here).

In September, Limbaugh played "Barack the Magic Negro" in honor of Ann Coulter's book about race relations. In her book Coulter seamlessly integrates facts with fanciful claims and outright fictions. Some of her assertions are absurd on their face; for example, she claims that "every liberal over a certain age claims to have marched in Selma and accompanied the freedom riders." [Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama, page 6]

Other of her lies take a little research to debunk. Coulter claims that all civil rights for blacks resulted from action by Republicans in opposition to Democrats. While there was unquestionably a racist southern wing of the Democratic Party, Coulter refuses to give any credit whatsoever to the liberals she detests. She attributes to Nixon civil rights accomplishments by Johnson, and to Eisenhower accomplishments by Truman.

Ann Coulter – book of lies

For example, Coulter wrote:

Eisenhower ... quickly moved to desegregate the military, something President Harry Truman had announced, but failed to fully implement... As with Truman's unenforced executive order desegregating the military, it took a Republican president to actually get it done. [Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama, pages 2-4]

Truman issued an "unenforced" executive order to desegregate the military? Only a supremely creative interpretation of the chronology could yield such a conclusion:

December 6, 1946: President Truman appoints the President's Committee on Civil Rights.  

October 29, 1947: The President's Committee on Civil Rights issues its landmark report, To Secure These Rights. The report condemns segregation wherever it exists and criticizes specifically segregation in the armed forces. The report recommends legislation and administrative action "to end immediately all discrimination and segregation based on race, color, creed or national origin in...all branches of the Armed Services."

January 1948: President Truman decides to end segregation in the armed forces and the civil service through administrative action (executive order) rather than through legislation.

February 2, 1948: President Truman announces in a special message to Congress on civil rights issues that he has "instructed the Secretary of Defense to take steps to have the remaining instances of discrimination in the armed services eliminated as rapidly as possible."

July 26, 1948: President Truman signs Executive Order 9981, which states, "It is hereby declared to be the policy of the President that there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion, or national origin." The order also establishes the President's Committee on Equality of Treatment and opportunity in the Armed Services.

April 1, 1949: Secretary of Defense Louis Johnson issues a directive to the Secretaries of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force which says it is the Department of Defense's policy that there should be equality of treatment and opportunity for all in the armed services, and that "qualified Negro personnel shall be assigned to fill any type of position...without regard to race."

Ca. June 1950 and following: Commanders at Army training facilities find it impossible to predict how many African-American recruits they will receive, with the result that the Army decides unofficially to integrate basic training.

Ca. June 1950 and following: Segregation in Army units serving in Korea gradually breaks down as white combat units suffer combat casualties and as large numbers of African-American recruits cannot be absorbed into segregated black service units.

Ca. January 1951: The Eighth Army in Korea adopts an unofficial policy of integrating African-American soldiers who cannot be effectively absorbed into segregated African-American units.

March 18, 1951: The Department of Defense announces that all basic training within the United States has been integrated.

April 1951: General Matthew B. Ridgway, head of the United Nations Command in Korea, requests that the Army allow him to integrate all African-Americans within his command.

July 26, 1951: The Army announces that the integration of all its units in Korea, Japan and Okinawa will be completed within six months.

January 1953: Dwight D. Eisenhower takes office as president.

October 1953: The Army announces that 95% of African-American soldiers are serving in integrated units.

[excerpts] Desegregation of the Armed Forces: Chronology

Right wing nut jobs rewriting history isn't any surprise, of course. Limbaugh buttresses his false assertion about Planned Parenthood with the following:
RUSH: Abortion has certainly made us insensitive to pregnancy. That was Margaret Sanger's idea. I'm not supposed to say that either. Margaret Sanger's idea was to convince people in America to abort their own seed...  Well, Margaret Sanger was targeting the black community, yes, that's right. That's politically incorrect to say. There are people watching Lincoln, the movie today, or reading commentary about it, I mean, people, elected officials who have no clue that it was Lincoln and the Republicans who freed the slaves. There's all this talk about – the story's somewhere in the stack – some elected Democrat as part of the budget negotiations going on, if we don't stop the Republicans, they want to take us back to slavery. They want to take us back to the days of Lincoln, is what this guy is saving.

Well, excuse me, Lincoln freed the slaves. The Republican Party, that's Lincoln's party, freed the slaves. But today the truth is obscured by a pack of lies. And the lie is that no Republican ever saw a slave that he didn't want to own, even today. That's what the elected Democrats are out there saying. It's like Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood is all about family planning. Yeah, but not the kind you're thinking about.  It's called the elimination of black families. That's what Margaret Sanger was about. Now, she's long gone, room temperature many, many moons ago. And now Planned Parenthood, what is it? Planned Parenthood, wow, does that not sound really nice? They're gonna teach you to plan your parenthood, plan your family. They're gonna teach you how to do it right.

No. We're gonna teach you how to not have one, is what Planned Parenthood's all about. How not to remain a parent once you become one.

  –Rush Limbaugh: Obama Aide to F. Chuck Todd: With These Republicans, "There'd Still be Slavery", December 3, 2012

Margaret Sanger in 1917

Margaret Sanger became an advocate of education about pregnancy and childbirth after witnessing the results of dangerous and illegal abortions. She is credited with coining the term "birth control". Sanger promoted the concept that women should have control of their own bodies.

At the time, disseminating information about birth control was illegal – a violation of the Comstock Laws. Sanger faced imprisonment for violation of obscenity laws and for "inciting murder and assassination" for articles that she wrote about birth control, but in 1916, after nearly two years of growing publicity about the case, the government dropped the charges.

Sanger was again arrested in 1917 for distribution of contraceptives. She was found guilty and sentenced to 30 days in a workhouse, but won the right for doctors to prescribe contraceptives on appeal. In all, Sanger was jailed eight times for her birth control activism.

Sanger founded the American Birth Control League in 1921, which later became Planned Parenthood.

An emblem symbolizing Comstock's New York
Society for the Suppression of Vice
The accusation of racism against Margaret Sanger is primarily due to the misinterpretation of one sentence that she wrote in 1939, at least as interpreted by her supporters. From the Margaret Sanger Papers Project:
In 1939 Sanger teamed with Mary Woodward Reinhardt, secretary of the newly formed BCFA, to secure a large donor to fund an educational campaign to teach African-American women in the South about contraception. Sanger, Reinhardt and Sanger's secretary, Florence Rose, drafted a report on "Birth Control and the Negro," skillfully using language that appealed both to eugenicists fearful of unchecked black fertility and progressives committed to shepherding African-Americans into middle-class culture. The report stated that "[N]egroes present the great problem of the South," as they are the group with "the greatest economic, health and social problems," and outlined a practical birth control program geared toward a population characterized as largely illiterate and that "still breed carelessly and disastrously," a line borrowed from a June 1932 Birth Control Review article by W.E.B. DuBois. Armed with this paper, Reinhardt initiated contact between Sanger and Albert Lasker (soon to be Reinhardt's husband), who pledged $20,000 starting in Nov. 1939. ("Birth Control and the Negro," July 1939, Lasker Papers)

However, once funding was secured, the project slipped from Sanger's hands. She had proposed that the money go to train "an up and doing modern minister, colored, and an up and doing modern colored medical man" at her New York clinic who would then tour "as many Southern cities and organizations and churches and medical societies as they can get before" and "preach and preach and preach!" She believed that after a year of such "educational agitation" the Federation could support a "practical campaign for supplying mothers with contraceptives." Before going in and establishing clinics, Sanger thought it critical to gain the support and involvement of the African-American community (not just its leaders) and establish a foundation of trust. Her proposal derived from the work of activists in the field, discussions with black leaders and her experience with the New York clinics. Sanger understood the concerns of some within the black community about having Northern whites intervene in the most intimate aspect of their lives. "I do not believe" she warned, "that this project should be directed or run by white medical men. The Federation should direct it with the guidance and assistance of the colored group – perhaps, particularly and specifically formed for the purpose." To succeed, she wrote, "It takes a very strong heart and an individual well entrenched in the community. . . ." (MS to Gamble, Nov. 26, 1939, and MS to Robert Seibels, Feb. 12, 1940 [MSM S17:514, 891].)

Sanger reiterated the need for black ministers to head up the project in a letter to Clarence Gamble in Dec. 1939, arguing that: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." This passage has been repeatedly extracted by Sanger's detractors as evidence that she led a calculated effort to reduce the black population against their will. From African-American activist Angela Davis on the left to conservative commentator Dinesh D'Souza on the right, this statement alone has condemned Sanger to a perpetual waltz with Hitler and the KKK. Davis quoted the incendiary passage in her 1983 Women, Race and Class, claiming that the Negro Project "confirmed the ideological victory of the racism associated with eugenic ideas." D'Souza used the quote to buttress erroneous claims that Sanger called blacks "human weeds" and a "menace to civilization" in his best-selling 1995 book The End of Racism.

  "Birth Control or Race Control? Sanger and the Negro Project," #28, Fall 2001

MSPP documents the scope and impact of lies by Limbaugh and others in the anti-choice movement:
Billboards put up in Atlanta in February with the message: “Black children are an endangered species,” re-energized the campaign among anti-abortion activists to vilify Sanger as a racist and led to a flurry of articles in the national news (See, for instance, “Anti-Abortion Billboards On Race Split Atlanta,” New York Times , Feb. 6; “Georgia Ads Link Race, Abortion,” Newsday , Feb. 15; “Antiabortion Activists See a Racial Conspiracy,” Los Angeles Times , March 2, 2010). The billboards, over 65 in number, link to a website ( ) that claims Sanger wanted to reduce the black population. The site includes a short explanation on the Negro Project that contends Sanger tried to do away with “a certain type of black individual.” Even though it draws from articles in the MSPP Newsletter that discuss Sanger’s work within the black community and in conjunction with local and national black leaders to help poor African-American women have access to safe and reliable contraception, the site ignores the documentary evidence. For example it features Sanger’s statement to Clarence Gamble in September 1939 that “we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population . . . .” This statement, which has gone viral on the Internet, is presented out of context and doesn’t reflect the fact that Sanger recognized elements within the black community might mistakenly associate the Negro Project with racist sterilization campaigns in the Jim Crow south, unless clergy and other community leaders spread the word that the Project had a humanitarian aim. No serious scholar and none of the dozens of black leaders who supported Sanger’s work have ever suggested that she tried to reduce the black population or set up black abortion mills, the implication in much of the extremist anti-choice material.


Quoting Margaret Sanger out of context appears to be a cottage industry in the right to life movement. Journalist Mike Wallace interviewed an aging Sanger in 1957. Wallace seemed more interested in inciting a perceived conflict between Sanger and the Catholic Church than in exploring the issue of birth control. The interview unfolds as a mild inquisition, with some of the social concepts implicit in his questioning seeming as archaic to the modern ear as his hyping of the sponsoring cigarette company. But in spite of some awkward moments, Sanger held her own on many of the questions.

At one point Wallace asked if she believed there is such a thing as "sin". Somewhat flustered by this early example of "gotcha" journalism, Sanger responded, "I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world–-that have disease from their parents that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all such a thing just marked when they’re born. That to me is the greatest sin–that people can–can commit." Her general intentions were clear from the context, but anti-abortionists have seized upon her initial statement, "I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world" to portray her as anti-family.

A partial transcript of the interview is here; the full interview is on Youtube in three ten minute segments:

Mike Wallace interview with Margaret Sanger (1/3)

Mike Wallace interview with Margaret Sanger (2/3)

Mike Wallace interview with Margaret Sanger (3/3)

The diarist is active in Flush Rush on Facebook:
Rush Limbaugh's talk radio career is in a slow downward spiral in part because of the activism of consumers, volunteers, and activists who seek to hold Rush accountable for his hate speech. One very active group in this cause is Flush Rush on Facebook. Flush Rush and other, similar groups use the StopRush Database to inform advertisers about where their ads are appearing.

Please consider joining. Small donations are also accepted to fund data storage; visit StopRush for more information.

Flush Rush on Facebook:
Stop Rush database:
My Stop Rush blog posts:
Twitter hashtag: #stoprush

Originally posted to Richard Myers on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 04:44 PM PST.

Also republished by Sluts and Feminism, Pro-Feminism, Womanism: Feminist Issues, Ideas, & Activism.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Hating Rush is one thing... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    But trying to clean up a believer in Eugenics is quite another...there's no good way to clean up her racism...the only good thing that came out of her beliefs was Planned Parenthood and the services it provides women in need...anything more is the same fantasy nonsense that Rush is pushing....

    •  please give examples of "trying to clean up" - n/t (0+ / 0-)

      Follow me on Twitter: @denverunionguy

      by Richard Myers on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 05:39:46 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  ..... (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        "...The accusation of racism against Margaret Sanger is primarily due to the misinterpretation of one sentence that she wrote in 1939. From the Margaret Sanger Papers Project:..."

        Not a misintrepation...

         "...From African-American activist Angela Davis on the left to conservative commentator Dinesh D'Souza on the right, this statement alone has condemned Sanger to a perpetual waltz with Hitler and the KKK..."

        When you get agreement from the the extremes of the right and left your problems are more likely than not problematic....and if you're actions are truly honorable and true there should be no need for a cloak of deception....

        Your avtions will stand on their own

        •  blah...need an edit button here (0+ / 0-)

          problems = actions

          •  Actually... (3+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            tle, DigDug, Halfton81

            The extreme left and right agree on certain things a lot more often than you'd expect. Take single-sex education, for example: the radical left (i.e. the "womyn with a Y" crowd) and the extreme right (the folks who think there's a worldwide conspiracy to frame as many innocent men for rape as possible) both tend to be very supportive of it, in large part because both ideologies boil down to little more than dislike of the other gender.*

            Now, I don't pretend to understand why Angela Davis interpreted Sanger's comments the way she did (and I don't think I want to know what Dinesh D'Souza might have been thinking, in this case or any other), but that they both condemn her means nothing beyond the cases they were trying to make in their respective writings. That said, we DO know that the right has never had any qualms about going through all sorts of logical acrobatics to establish that we on the left are the real racists. So it isn't even worth considering whether D'Souza's claim holds any water whatsoever. One can assume it doesn't, given his track record. Angela Davis does give me some more pause, but from the context here it sounds like the topic at hand was eugenics. Eugenics is one of those ideas that have been thoroughly discredited and tossed on the scrap heap of history, yet there was a time when otherwise-reasonable people supported it. While unfortunate, that doesn't mean those people were necessarily racists.

            By my reading, the offending quote just means Sanger was aware of the possibility that the Karl Roves of her day might misrepresent her for political gain. And the very existence of this diary proves she was right about that.

            *Allow me to make it clear here that I am NOT saying all supporters of single-sex education hate the other sex. Just that the other way around is often the case.

            Certaines personnes disent qu'il y a une femme à blâmer, Mais je sais que c'est ma faute sacrément.

            by RamblinDave on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 06:45:57 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

    •  Belief In Eugenics Was Pretty Universal Back Then (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Farugia, happy camper

      There’s always free cheddar in a mousetrap, baby

      by bernardpliers on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 06:05:49 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  true... (0+ / 0-)

        but that doesn't make it ok...

        •  Eugenics ideas tend to be shocking to us (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          and i think that is appropriate, especially after twentieth century experiences such as mass exterminations (such as those during WWII), and disgusting race-based medical experiments conducted even in the U.S.

          Having said that, i wish that one aspect of Eugenics goals wasn't essentially a taboo topic today, and that is discussion of population limits. Sooner or later our civilization will have to have that conversation, and if we wait too long, addressing the problems of resource depletion and environmental degradation will be much more difficult.

          Other than that, i do believe that many of the ideas behind eugenics are objectionable. We have the advantage of seeing how some of the ideas had very bad effects. I would like to think that many proponents of eugenics would reach the same conclusions if they were here today, looking back on that history.

          But i would also observe that we may be embracing ideas in our own society that will seem similarly outmoded and "not ok" when we see the ultimate results of genetic engineering, cloning, computing singularity, etc. Hindsight may not always be "20-20", but it sure beats trying to predict the future when technology is changing so quickly.

          Follow me on Twitter: @denverunionguy

          by Richard Myers on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 07:01:52 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

  •  So the man who once said "Take that (4+ / 0-)

    bone out of your nose" to a black caller now wants to be the savior of American Blacks. How nice.

    Send conservatives to for re-education.

    by filthyLiberalDOTcom on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 05:32:49 PM PST

  •  Yes, it's an ugly attack on Planned Parenthood: (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    RamblinDave, OllieGarkey, filkertom
    His goal is driving a wedge between Dems and one of their most loyal constituencies.
    And at one time, a few decades ago, Republicans were known for succeeding at their divide-and-conquer tactics. But the people who are supposed to be won-over, increasingly, aren't nibbling.

    It's here they got the range/ and the machinery for change/ and it's here they got the spiritual thirst. --Leonard Cohen

    by karmsy on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 05:44:29 PM PST

  •  Rush and his minions (0+ / 0-)

    Are so stupid they think a pregnancy is a family.  That's how stupid his listeners are.  God it's hopeless.

    Republicans: Taking the country back ... to the 19th century

    by yet another liberal on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 05:51:05 PM PST

  •  Rush's version of solidarity with black women (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    but like all his attempts at empathy outside of his 1%, he hasn't a clue, and with an almost blinding pathos, he doesn't have a clue that he doesn't have a clue.  Priceless.

    "Out of Many, One Nation." This is the great promise of the United States of America -9.75 -6.87

    by Uncle Moji on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 06:06:26 PM PST

  •  How STUPID CAN ONE FAT ME BE? (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Richard Myers, filkertom, Halfton81

    If the goal of planned parenthood was to eliminate black families the GOP would be funding the shit out of it.

  •  Increasingly popular approach from "pro-lifers" (0+ / 0-)

    Remember the billboard campaign "The Most Dangerous Place for an African American Is in the Womb"?

    " can’t find any oxygen from outside the aircraft to get in the aircraft, because the windows don’t open. I don’t know why they don’t do that. It’s a real problem." Mitt Romney

    by Catte Nappe on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 06:39:00 PM PST

  •  His argument isn't even new (0+ / 0-)

    Ann Coulter has been saying the same thing (i.e. that Planned Parenthood is out to do to blacks what Hitler did to the Jews) for years. I doubt she was the first one to come up with that either, given the anti-choice movement's fondness for comparing itself to the civil rights movement.

    Certaines personnes disent qu'il y a une femme à blâmer, Mais je sais que c'est ma faute sacrément.

    by RamblinDave on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 06:48:00 PM PST

  •  Rush hates black people so much (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    one would think he'd be lauding PP for doing the work he claims. His hypocrisy and lies astound me, and that people BELIEVE him only astounds me more.

  •  Didnt Planned Parenthood Have Black Female Prez? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    ....for many years?

    There’s always free cheddar in a mousetrap, baby

    by bernardpliers on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 07:01:45 PM PST

  •  Yeah, there was no misinterpretation of Sanger (0+ / 0-)

    she was a Eugenicist who felt it better if poor blacks did not reproduce

    That being said, it is still not an effective argument against reproductive freedom.  We are talking about given women of all colors a choice.

  •  And Yet Dinesh D'Souza promotes Nazi Race Theory (0+ / 0-)

    His movie promotes the idea that Obama is tainted by the jungle blood of the father he barely met so he can never really be a loyal American.

    This is exactly the mumbo-jumbo standard used by the Nazis - citizenship does not depend on being born a citizen and being raised as a citizen. Instead  it is a mystical association of blood and spirit and national will.  This was why the Germans said the Jews could never assimilate in a thousand years, even though the average German Jew was very cosmopolitan and patriotic.

    There’s always free cheddar in a mousetrap, baby

    by bernardpliers on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 08:57:04 PM PST

  •  I went to a planned parenthood. (0+ / 0-)

    For my annual exam, that is. No, I didn't go there for an abortion.

    It's like any other doctor's office visit except I can pay cash for the visit and leave them a donation.

    And outside of their office are people who hold up signs condemning the people who work there and the patients who go there. We just want affordable healthcare. What's wrong with that?

    No children from me. I suppose the republicans like that about me.

    Why hello there reality, how are you doing?

    by Future Gazer on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 09:15:19 PM PST

  •  Neither Coulter nor Limbaugh (0+ / 0-)

    could be successful in the world of naked, fend for yourself business world where you gained income solely from the merits of your abilities. Coulter gets her fortune from bulk sales of her pap, purchased by big money and sent off as complimentary gifts. No one really gives a rat's ass what she writes. She's got celebrity status and her name draws attention. That's it.

    Limbaugh's got funding from the billionaires to promote their strategy of dumbing down the population to increase control. He's simply not interesting enough to be on 600 radio stations when he really has nothing to say about anything, except what he makes up in his projections and rationalizations.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site