Skip to main content

[Cross-posted at Blog For Arizona]

The so-called fiscal cliff negotiations took a turn a few days ago when Speaker Boehner acknowledged that more tax revenue needed to come from those at the top, but took the position that the revenue must come from closing loopholes and capping deductions, not from raising rates. Democrats took the position that there is not enough revenue to be raised simply by closing loopholes and capping deductions, thus appearing to concede the point that limiting deductions is better policy than raising rates.

I beg to differ. Here are three situations that should be presented to Mr. Boehner as a preface to him defending his position:

Sam and Alice have taxable income of $250,000 per year, taking into account $20,000 that they give annually to Smile Train, a charity, which allows 80 kids born with cleft lip or cleft palate to have a chance at a normal life. John and Jane have taxable income of $366,666, with no charitable deductions. If we cap charitable deductions at $10,000 and leave rates at 2012 rates, Sam and Alice pay an extra $3,500 in 2013. If we allow the Bush tax cuts for those above $250,000 to expire but don't limit deductions, John and Jane pay the extra $3,500. Which is the better policy?

Sam and Alice have taxable income of $250,000 per year, taking into account a deduction for $10,000 that they pay in state and local taxes. John and Jane have taxable income of $366,666 and live in a state where they are not required to pay income tax. If we eliminate the deduction for state and local income taxes, Sam and Alice pay an extra $3,500. If we revert to the pre-Bush rates on income over $250,000, John and Jane pay the $3,500 in addtional tax. Which is the better policy? Does it really make sense to charge Sam and Alice $3,500 in federal income tax on income they are compelled to pay over to their state's government, simply so John and Jane can pay less tax on the income they actually can control and enjoy?  

Sam, a young emergency room doctor who works at an inner city hospital, and his wife, Alice, have taxable income of $250,000 per year, taking into account a deduction $20,000 of mortgage interest. Sam also pays interest on $300,000 of student loans incurred for his medical education, most of which is not deductible. John and Jane, a retired couple, have $366,666 of taxable income from their bond portfolio. They own their house free and clear. If we limit the mortgage interest deduction to $10,000, Sam and Alice pay an additional $3,500. If we allow the rates on taxable income in excess of $250,000 to revert to pre-Bush rates, John and Jane pay the additional $3,500 in tax. Which is the better policy? If our objective here is to avoid passing our crushing federal debt to younger and future generations, why would we force the younger homeowners, who still are paying their mortgages, to bear the burden of reducing the debt, in order to allow the older generation, who reaped the benefits of the debt while it was incurred, to get a free ride?

Your thoughts Mr. Boehner?



Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Great post, every time they say loopholes and (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    deductions I think what a bad idea that would be if not done "VERY" well. AND I have no hope that congress to do anything well let alone "VERY" well.

    A lot of those so called loopholes and deductions were made to guide money into doing good so if you did not want to pay it to Uncle Sam you could pay it to something good for the rest of us instead of the government.

    Our money system is not what we have been led to believe. The creation of money has been "privatized," or taken over by private money lenders. Thomas Jefferson called them “bold and bankrupt adventurers just pretending to have money.” webofdebt

    by arealniceguy on Fri Dec 07, 2012 at 04:36:32 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site