Skip to main content

There has been much discussion over what we can do to affect change for the next election.  It's time for Michigan to join the majority of the other states in making changes to the way we vote.  Specifically, I am calling for the following changes:

* Early voting
* No excuse absentee voting
* Permanent absentee voters
* Making election day a state holiday

Early Voting
* 16 states have no provisions for early voting, including Michigan.
* 2 states have an all-mail voting system

The benefits of having early voting are numerous, and not popular from the Republican party.  But to win them over, we should be pushing this point by arguing that this will actually help prevent voter fraud.  By allowing people to vote early (I suggest 14 days), we have more time to investigate questionable activity.  And it frees resources on the day of the election and the days after.  It's about streamlining the election process.

No excuse absentee voting
* 29 states currently allow for no-excuse absentee voting.  Michigan is not one of them.  There is no excuse for not having no excuse absentee voting.  

In Michigan (http://www.michigan.gov/...):
As a registered voter, you may obtain an absentee voter ballot if you are:

* age 60 years old or older
* unable to vote without assistance at the polls
* expecting to be out of town on election day
* in jail awaiting arraignment or trial
* unable to attend the polls due to religious reasons
* appointed to work as an election inspector in a precinct outside of your precinct of residence.

By having a no-excuse absentee policy, we eliminate the additional and costly checks and confusion that these requirements entail.  It will allow Michigan to focus more on making sure that people able to vote can.  If you are a registered voter, you get a ballot in the mail (if you wish).  It's so simple.

Permanent absentee voters
Once you vote absentee, we should be working to implement a system in which voters are automatically mailed an absentee ballot for the next election.  As in California, this continues so long as you vote.  We can go further and when you change addresses, the election system is updated so that you are automatically registered at your new address.

This will remove a major hurdle for getting access to the ballot box on election day.  We can save our state's resources that are allocated for registering new voters by allowing them to focus on new voters that need to register.  Once you've registered to vote, there is no reason to have to jump through those hurdles again and again.

Making election day a state holiday
Before everyone gets all worked up about yet another state holiday, I would offset it with Columbus Day.  If we observe Columbus Day on Election Day in even numbered years, there is no cost to the state, and everyone has the benefit of being able to vote without the fear of losing a job or using up sick time or vacation time.

Now, given the events in Michigan this week, with voter anger over the content and manner in which these bills were passed, I am certain that no Republican-led chamber is going to want to give voters even more access to the polls.  But that is no reason to not start now.  We need to be pushing now for a comprehensive set of laws that encourage more people to vote, to lower the barriers to allowing legitimate voters to cast their decision.  We make it an issue now, and make it an election year issue in 2014.  To be against these changes is indefensible, but only if we make it so.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  We will need to oust the Sec. of State et.al. (4+ / 0-)

    People don't understand just how much of a stranglehold the Republicans have on the major elected offices in this state.  Unless we can mobilize and get rid of Ruth Johnson, Bill Schuette, Rick Snyder, and the leadership in the state house and senate, the floggings will continue.

    I like the ideas, I just think trying for another ballot initiative is a waste of resources.  We need the right people in office.

    •  How do you get those people? (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Sylv, victoryleft

      With the cards now massively stacked against you and nobody left inside the state of Michigan with even a shred of resources to respond the the billionaires' club — one of the major intents of Right to Work for less — how on earth do you do this, short of finding a ticket of your own billionaires to run? You cannot respond to them with $10 donations that people will be increasingly stretched to make.

      Jon Husted is a dick.

      by anastasia p on Wed Dec 12, 2012 at 04:59:08 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  have you seen... (0+ / 0-)

        followthemoney.org?  Dem candidates are absolutely horrible at raising $10 contributions.  So that's part of it.  But we all know that Kock et all will be pumping huge amounts into state races in 2014.  As soon as the filing period starts, we have to start the fundraising.  Soros et all might get attracted with all the attention as well.

        The house is within range for 2014, and the 2012 election showed us that big money doesn't always win.

    •  I wasn't talking about a ballot initi. on this one (0+ / 0-)

      We make this an issue to run on, and when the house/senate flips to the Ds, we pass a law.

  •  Add one more thing to that: drop state (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    victoryleft

    support of intra-party political processes like primaries and the like, or else make them a) completely open and b) turn them into the first round of a general runoff-style election.

    There's no reason Joe Taxpayer ought to fund the candidate selection process of any political party. The state support of political parties creates a feedback loop that allows the corrupted leadership in the dominant parties to further entrench themselves, at our expense.

    •  I like the idea but... (0+ / 0-)

      couldn't that backfire and put two Rs on the ticket?  how do you solve that?

      •  By taking the first option: getting out (0+ / 0-)

        of the candidate selection process altogether. Most states have rules providing for inclusion on the ballot of a qualified individual, e.g. petition or paying a fee (frequently a percentage of the salary of the office the candidate seeks). That should be the end of the states' involvement regarding who can be a  candidate.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site