Skip to main content

As Chuck Stone of the Philadelphia Daily News, founding president of the National Association of Black Journalists, wrote in 1988:

"Since the Kerner Commission, the number of minority journalists has inched up with all the speed of a one-legged tortoise climbing a hill in a hailstorm."
In his article, Why Should We Care About Diversity, Edward Pease of Utah State University noted how:
When the Kerner Commission chastised the newspaper business 20 years before for its failure to inform the society about issues in black America, more than 99 percent of U.S. newspaper reporters and editors were white. Now, almost a quarter-century later, the proportion of racial "minorities" in the population still outstrips the proportion of minorities in newspaper newsrooms by three to one. At the end of 1990, 8.72 percent of newsroom professionals -- reporters, copyeditors, desk editors, photographers and graphic artists, etc. -- were minorities. The country, however, is more than 24 percent nonwhite, and is projected to be 32 percent "minority" by the year 2010; by the middle of the next century, whites no longer will be the numerical majority in this country. But where will news organizations be?
Other interesting details:
It is not only fatally short-sighted, but morally wrong for the press that covers America not to employ the people of America. And even if it weren't morally wrong, it is economic stupidity in a nation where 87 percent of the population growth between now and the year 2000 will be people of color. Even now, 119 languages are spoken in New York City, and the non-Anglo populations in the states of Texas and California are approaching 50 percent.  ... At the start of the 1990s, many in this country thought racism had in fact grown even more prevalent than it had been in the 1960s, when the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement forced the nation to acknowledge the injustice of a society that systematically excludes citizens because of race or ethnic background. Much has changed since the 1960s, but people of color still are largely excluded -- or included only as second-class citizens -- from both newsrooms and news content. Although most large U.S. newspapers circulate in urban areas where the nonwhite population ranges into the 50 percent range and higher, a variety of scholarly studies of news media performance show that coverage of minorities by those large metropolitan newspapers tends to account for only about 3 percent of their total news coverage. Further, more than half of white journalists and more than 70 percent of minority journalists surveyed in an national 1991 study said their own newspapers covered minority communities marginally or poorly.

From these examples, it is apparent that the news industry still systematically excludes people from the media mainstream because of their race or cultural origins. The news industry is not keeping up with demographic change in this country, either in terms of employing people of diverse backgrounds as information gatherers and gatekeepers or in terms of providing content and coverage of people who are not white.

After being motivated by the message of the Pease article, which was published in 1991, I gave my college Communication 101 students an assignment.

They were to provide five references to essentially update the Pease piece. Their references needed to be within the last five years.

I thought it would be fun. After all, aren't we in the age of Obama? Surely there would be interesting findings from our new sources, including progress. And of course, can't someone turn on the television any day and see men and women of color anchoring the major networks, as well as other popular shows?

The results made me realize just how limited my perception of progress was in this critical arena.

In an answer to Pease's question above, where he cites the year 2010, one of my students offered this reference:

“At that time…1978…, there were 43,000 journalists, 3.95 percent of whom were minorities. Now, there are 41,500 journalists and 13.26 percent are minorities. The numbers in this loose comparison show that although newsroom diversity hasn’t gained ground in recent years, over the long term it has.” (Mallary Jean Tenore, 2010).
Since "Why we should care?" has effectively addressed, let me move to other questions.

Why hasn't newsroom diversity hasn’t gained ground in recent years?

Do news outlets cover minority communities any better than they did in 1991?

How far have we really come?

Your thoughts?


How much does American media represent and serve the U.S. population?

57%4 votes
14%1 votes
14%1 votes
0%0 votes
14%1 votes

| 7 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Desde 1926 (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    That's what La Opinion (the leading Spanish language newspaper in Los Angeles) has on the front of its print version.

    I suspect that they have a couple of minority journalists.

    In some cities, Univision is the #1 rated TV station and El Piolin is the #1 morning disk jockey.

    But then ESPN Deportes has a commentator named John Sutcliffe.

    •  Looks pretty good (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      In November 2007, La Opinión ranked #1 in net daily paid circulation growth among the 200 largest newspapers in America for the six-month period ending September 2007, based on the latest FAS-FAX Report from the Audit Bureau of Circulation. The daily average is based on Monday-Friday.

      However, since 2008, the staff of La Opinion has dwindled and the Impre Media empire grew weaker.

      As of May 2012, a subsidiary of the Argentine newspaper La Nacion purchased a majority share of Impremedia and La Opinion.

      But I can't help but wonder about the staff and journalist diversity among the other 199 largest news outlets in the U.S.

  •  Wow There Are So Many Things Wrong With (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    the entire free press concept, which cedes the information sphere to global corporate information warlords, that this is no surprise.

    Pick a service we need from a press; freedom of the corporate press either fails to deliver it or suppresses it.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Fri Dec 14, 2012 at 08:01:52 PM PST

  •  It's kind of insane (0+ / 0-)

    to think about how much they'd spend on hiring editing services to cover up certain unfavorable details.

    Well, the newsroom coverage definitely has improved over the past decade, that is undeniably true. But it is not at the optimal level that is best of everyone's interest.

    My country, despite being "first-world", tweaks the media so badly to their tyrannical propoganda even till today. Although racial equality is not an issue in my place here (and I admit the government did a good job on this one), relative poverty is rapidly surging behind the scenes, which is not represented at all in our media.

    I do feel with the advent of the Internet and technology, and society's cooperation, media's representation will still gradually improve, but it definitely needs some boost from society itself.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site