Skip to main content

Yesterday evening, an unpleasant pungent odor settled in around the same time that a piece appeared in the HuffingtonPost alleging that the President had a brand new offer for the Republicans in the fiscal negotiations.  

“The details of the offer were sent to The Huffington Post on condition of the source's anonymity.  The White House has moved off of its initial and second revenue demands of $1.6 trillion and $1.4 trillion respectively. As of now, the president would be fine raising $1.2 trillion in revenue. He also is no longer insisting that taxes increase on families with income above $250,000. Instead, he is calling for a permanent extension of the Bush tax cuts for incomes of less than $400,000.”
Oh really?  On condition of the source’s anonymity?  That won't do.  Back in the day, substantiation and attribution were how Journalism was done. Those are antiquated notions now.  Consume at your own risk.

Later in the evening, the odor grew more rank when a second piece appeared in the HuffingtonPost.  The President’s new offer included a detail that the first article somehow missed.  

“It would also gradually reduce Social Security, pension and disability benefits seniors are due to receive, taking a small bite up front, but building up to much larger cuts over time. . . the proposed Social Security reform is known as ‘chained CPI’”
Still no substantiation or attribution.  

In the morning news outlets here and there were reporting the same thing, that the President offered to cut Social Security benefits by changing the methodology for calculating annual cost of living adjustments by using the Chained Consumer Price Index.

There was still no substantiation or attribution.  Various news reports referred to the President's offer as fine print found in drafts circulating around Capitol Hill.  Others seemed to be regurgitating what was printed elsewhere describing President Obama's offer, "as summarized in news reports Tuesday morning."

I posted a petition to the White House asking for protection of Social Security benefits.

Later in the day the following statement by Press Secretary, Jay Carney, appeared on the White House website.

The President has put a balanced, reasonable proposal on the table that achieves significant deficit reduction and reflects real compromise by meeting the Republicans halfway on revenue and more than halfway on spending from where each side started. That is the essence of compromise. The parameters of a deal are clear, and the President is willing to continue to work with Republicans to reach a bipartisan solution that averts the fiscal cliff, protects the middle class, helps the economy, and puts our nation on a fiscally sustainable path. But he is not willing to accept a deal that doesn’t ask enough of the very wealthiest in taxes and instead shifts the burden to the middle class and seniors. The Speaker’s “Plan B” approach doesn’t meet this test because it can’t pass the Senate and therefore will not protect middle class families, and does little to address our fiscal challenges with zero spending cuts. The President is hopeful that both sides can work out remaining differences and reach a solution so we don’t miss the opportunity in front of us today.
I make it a practice to never accept news reports that are unsubstantiated and unattributed as the final word on anything.  I don't care if the source is the New York Times, the LA Times, the Washington Post.  I might make an exception for Amy Goodman from Democracy Now!  Otherwise, forget it.  Give me names, dates, places, something that can be checked.  That means nothing can be believed unless it comes from the source.  

Once bogus news is squeezed out of the tube and the public reacts, it almost doesn't matter what the subject says several hours or half a day later.  Even if he was never quoted in the first place, he's the one who appears to have changed his story, because the public just isn't that fastidious about what it consumes.

Originally posted to leftreborn on Tue Dec 18, 2012 at 03:45 PM PST.

Also republished by Social Security Defenders.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site