Skip to main content

When CODEPINK, MoveOn and representatives of other organizations marched into Senator Harry Reid’s DC office on Tuesday, December 18, they wanted a simple answer to a simple question: Does the Senator support a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity clips, such as the legislation proposed by Senator Dianne Feinstein and
supported by President Obama and Vice President Biden? It would seem like a no-brainer for the Senate Majority Leader to fall in line with the leadership of his party in backing a modest bill that would ban the sale of weapons that are only good for mass murder. Unfortunately, Reid’s senior policy advisor Kasey Gillette was unable to give an answer.

While there is a lot of talk in Democratic circles about Republicans standing in the way of sensible gun laws, a hidden secret is that the Democratic Senator leader from Nevada, who is key to getting gun control legislation passed in this country, has been as pro-gun as most Republicans.

In the past, Reid has touted the rights of gun owners and eagerly sought the NRA's endorsements, contributions and praise. In 2004, Reid was one of the rare Democrats to be endorsed by the NRA. In 2009 he sought to please the powerful lobby by supporting a controversial bill to allow gun owners with concealed weapon permits to cross state lines. The legislation, which was vehemently opposed by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, fell just two votes short of the 60 votes needed. The NRA, however, was delighted that Reid had supported the bill and allowed it to be brought to the floor for a vote.

In 2010, when Reid was engaged in a bitter re-election campaign against Republican Sharron Angle, the NRA refrained from endorsing, but contributed to Reid’s campaign and reminded voters of his pro-gun record. An NRA letter to its Nevada members touted that Reid “opposed the Obama administration’s interest in reinstating the assault weapons ban, halting momentum; helped pass a law that allows gun owners to carry firearms in national parks; voted against the District of Columbia’s gun ban; voted for legislation to allow pilots in commercial airline cockpits to be armed.” It also noted that Reid was instrumental in passing legislation halting lawsuits that were attempting to hold gun manufacturers and dealers responsible for weapons used in criminal acts.

NRA head Wayne LaPierre called Senator Reid “a true champion of the Second Amendment” and said “no one has been a stronger advocate for responsible gun ownership than him.”

After the Aurora, Colorado movie theater shootings in July 2012, Senator Reid blocked any debate about gun control, insisting that the Senate schedule was “too packed” to spend time on it.

After this latest tragedy at Sandy Hook that left 20 children dead, Reid took a timid step forward, saying it was time to “engage in a meaningful conversation and thoughtful debate about how to change laws and culture that allow violence to grow." Hinting at a softening of his position, he said that as we discuss how best to protect our nation’s
children, “every idea should be on the table.”

But for the gun control advocates in his office on Tuesday, Reid’s faint-hearted call for reform was not nearly enough. With alarm clocks in hand, they said the time for discussion was long past; they wanted action. They said it was time for Senator Reid to stand up to the NRA and to use his leadership to protect our children, not the gun

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has been making the same demand. “Calling for 'meaningful action' is not enough," he said. "We need immediate action. We have heard all the rhetoric before. What we have not seen is leadership -- not from the White House and not from Congress. That must end today. This is a national tragedy and it demands a national response."

In a move that seems to heed the call for action, President Obama just appointed Vice President Joe Biden to lead a task force on new gun laws. Senator Dianne Feinstein said she will introduce legislation early next year to ban the sale of new assault weapons, as well as big clips, drums and strips of more than 10 bullets. Even Virginia's Mark Warner,
one of the few staunch pro-gun Senate Democrats, reversed course to back restrictions on assault weapons, declaring that "the status quo is not acceptable anymore.”

With 20 children dead, President Obama insisting that preventing gun violence will be a second-term policy priority, and Harry Reid not facing re-election until 2016, perhaps the Senator will now be willing to stand up to the NRA? The clock is ticking.

Medea Benjamin is cofounder of and She is author of the recent book Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote Control.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Most Village Dems (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    are just hoping that this all disappears as quickly and quietly as possible. It is disgusting.

    •  You have something, anything (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      that resembles a fact to support this statement? Or is just some cynical rant that you pulled out  . . . . of thin air.

      Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?

      by jsfox on Thu Dec 20, 2012 at 10:24:25 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Bad morning? n/t (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
      •  Here is a more serious (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        answer than your snotty comment deserves.

        The leader of the senate is pro gun - you really think he wants this hanging around.

        Bob Casey is another

        Casey opposes gun-control laws, including the 10-year ban on 19 types of assault weapons that expired in 2004. He vowed to aggressively court sportsmen’s support by emphasizing his character, his long support for gun owners’ rights and his record in state government. “I’ve been a strong supporter of the second amendment, the right to bear arms. That’s evidenced not just by what I’ve said but the support I’ve gotten over the last decade from sportsmen’s groups, including the NRA,” Casey said.
        Note praise for NRA

        Oh and Jim Webb:

        The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states in pertinent part that “…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”  I am a gun owner, a sportsman, and a long-time member of the National Rifle Association.  As a United States Senator, I take seriously my role in protecting the fundamental right of U.S. citizens to bear arms.
        from his own website - see the bit about long time member of the NRA?

        just let me know if you want me to carry on.

  •  Going to have to do (0+ / 0-)

    much better than the last ban, it really left plenty of alternatives available. If we grandfather in all the guns already out there, it will do even less.

    Last week I was thinking that banning high rate of fire weapons (assault semiautomatics, magazines with more than 5 or 10 round capacity, semiautomatic pistols with same) would be the best way to stop mass shootings.

    I still think so, but since we have the equivalent of Newtown every day in non-mass shootings and mass shootings come along way less than once a week, stopping the mass shootings would cut the gun murder totals by about 2 percent or less. And I've leaving out the gun suicide problem entirely, even though it's twice the rate of gun murders here.

    To really put a dent into ordinary shootings, of which there are about 10,000 a year in round numbers, more ordinary guns will have to be effectively restricted to those who won't kill people with them.

    And that can really be accomplished in only  two ways- finding out who is mentally qualified to own a gun without being likely to kill somebody with it, and/or just banning almost all guns for almost all reasons the way the U.K. and Australia did it.

    I've seen the murder rate statistics for those two places. We're different here, a total ban would be much more effective because our gun murder rates are much higher.

    If it could be done here, that is. So far all we are getting are proposals to restrict or ban high rate of fire weapons. They are only a very small part of the overall problem here.

    Moderation in most things.

    by billmosby on Thu Dec 20, 2012 at 10:54:18 AM PST

  •  Re: Harry Reid. (0+ / 0-)

    I sure as hell hope my Senator, Harry Reid doesn't cave to these gun control fanatics. Reid has been very good on the 2A so far and I've already written and phoned his office and demanded that he holds steady on his stance.
    Harry Reid was there in 94 when the we lost control of the Congress and I doubt that he wants a repeat of that.

    I will fight tooth and nail against what MAIG, Brady, and VPC want, mainly a full ban on firearms.

  •  Your title gave me a nice chuckle. (0+ / 0-)

    Thanks . . . I think.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site