Skip to main content

For a long time many of us Kossacks have pointed out that as much as we disliked his policies the actions of the real Ronald Reagan as president were very much at odds with the imagined St Ronnie of the Tea Party including raising taxes 11 times, supporting the Brady Bill & assault weapons bans, implementing an actual amnesty for illegal immigrants and (heresy of heresies) actually being willing to talk to and compromise with Democrats when necessary.

Now suddenly I find a Teabagger who actually called Blessed St Ronnie a RINO.

More below the Orange Squiggle of Doom:

I was just reading Mark McKinnon's latest column over on the Daily Beast in which he points out the GOP's unwillingness to compromise is killing the party.  Now putting aside McKinnon personally or the content of the column (most of which I tend to agree with) I made the mistake of reading some of the comments and when I came across this one my jaw about hit the floor:


@Colonel Fitzwilliam Reagan was a RINO. He was a Hollywood weirdo and a union boss.

Now granted this is just one commenter on one column on one website, but is this the beginning of the end for the Tea Party?  Obviously Tea Partiers are anything but reality based to suddenly start turning on their idol and calling him a RINO is shocking.  Is this one even more extreme loon or is this the cutting edge of Tea Party thinking.  They long ago jettisoned Barry Goldwater as not a "real conservative" but having to deal with the reality of who Ronald Reagan was and actually did are they going to give him the boot too?  If so who becomes the new Tea Party icon?

I'm just stunned.


Ronald Reagan, was he

36%13 votes
13%5 votes
41%15 votes
8%3 votes
0%0 votes

| 36 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I think you stumbled across an "extreme loon" (0+ / 0-)

    Reagan is a saint to the entrenched conservatives and I really cannot believe he will be abandoned especially in light  of his record on AIDS, women and education.

  •  Was that even a conservative? (0+ / 0-)

    It sounds like a snarky liberal comment.

    If it is a conservative, I definitely think he's an anomaly. The Reagan myth is deeply entrenched. Conservatives at large will never confront the reality that was the Reagan presidency. They can't.

    Homosexuality is found in over 450 species. Homophobia is found in only one. Which one seems unnatural now?

    by Chrislove on Mon Dec 24, 2012 at 10:37:12 AM PST

  •  Well, considering that (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Mr. Reagan and Mr. Obama are more or less political soulmates, this guy might have a point.

    But sadly, the dynamic is actually just the opposite of what he/she said.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site