The memorial, a 10-by-4 foot leather-looking scroll, contains the names of the executed men as well as a poem and prayer.
The hangings came at the end of the six-week uprising. Afterward, most of the Dakota and the Winnebago Indians, who had nothing to do with it, fled or were forced out of Minnesota.
Arvol Looking Horse, the 19th generation keeper of the White Buffalo Calf Pipe Bundle and spiritual leader of the Lakota, Dakota and Nakota people spoke to the crowd Wednesday:
|“Today, being here to witness a great gathering, we have peace in our hearts — a new beginning of healing,” Looking Horse said. [...]
“This is a great day, not only for the Dakota but for the city of Mankato,” said Bud Lawrence, a Mankato resident who helped establish the first pow-wow and the start of a reconciliation effort in the 1970s.[...]
Sidney Byrd, Dakota/Lakota elder from Flandreau, S.D., read the names of the 38 men in the Dakota language. “I’m proud to be with you today. My great-grandfather was one of those who paid the supreme price for our freedom,” he said.
Vernell and Ernest Wabasha with young relative
Now, direct descendants of those hanged that day want to establish a memorial to them in Reconciliation Park in Mankato. But the majority of the city council, after informally approving the memorial, retreated recently by tabling formal consideration. Calling up old language, one councilman spoke of the "hostility" in the words of a 1971 poem that supporters of the memorial want included on it. That poem, which the councilman called divisive and untrue had nothing to do with reconciliation, he said.
Like hundreds of conflicts in the Indian wars before and after, the 1862 Dakota resistance arose out of broken promises. Before the ink was dry on the 1851 Treaty of Traverse des Sioux, Congress had stricken the crucial Article 3. This guaranteed a strip of land 70 miles long and 10 miles wide on each side of the Minnesota River for a reservation. Instead, Congress bought the land for 10 cents an acre and annuities.
Jerome Big Eagle
The push into a smaller space was meant to force the Dakota to adopt a new way of life. Chief Big Eagle said many years later, “It seemed too sudden to make a change [...] If the Indians had tried to make the whites live like them, the whites would have resisted and it was the same with many Indians.”
Though accounts of his specific words vary, storekeeper Andrew J. Myrick inflamed passions in August 1862, by remarking at a meeting where Dakota representatives sought to buy food on credit, "If they are hungry, let them eat grass." Several days after the meeting, four hungry and enraged Rice Creek Dakotas took it out on five settlers near Acton, Minn. Those killings spurred Dakota chief Little Crow to call a council that chose to go to war. Soon after the fighting broke out, Myrick was found dead with grass stuffed in his mouth.
The conflict ultimately killed some 500 whites and an uncounted number of Dakotas, including the 38 who were hanged in December that year. At one point, thinking the uprising might be part of a Rebel conspiracy, President Lincoln pondered the option of freeing 10,000 Confederate POWs to fight the Dakota under Union commanders. Before that could happen, however, the war was over.
In late September, a five-member military commission was convened. On the first day, 10 Dakota were sentenced to death. So it went for six weeks, 393 cases, 323 convictions, 303 death sentences. Thanks to pleas from an episcopal bishop, Lincoln commuted the sentences of all but 39, and one additional man was later granted a reprieve. The day after Christmas, chanting their death songs, they marched single file onto the gallows in Mankato and were hanged. Seven months later, Little Crow — who had escaped to Canada before the trial but returned to Minnesota — was killed by a white settler who shot him for a $500 bounty. Little Crow's scalp and skull were displayed in St. Paul and finally returned to his grandson in 1971.
The proposed memorial
But those sculptures aren't enough for Vernal Wabasha (Dakota). She and others want a memorial in the park for those executed. “They have markers all along the road about our savage Indians attacking white people,” said Wabasha, who has been married to Ernest Wabasha, a hereditary Dakota chief, for 56 years. He is the sixth chief of that name. The third one was chief at the time of the executions. Said Vernell Wabasha: “These men fought for the Dakota way of life, trying to hang onto something, to hang onto this land for the future generations of their children and grandchildren. [...] They weren't savages like they've been depicted for so long,”
Designed by Linda Bernard and Martin Barnard (Dakota), the proposed memorial lists the 38 names on a 10-by-4-foot scroll. The phrase “forgive everyone everything” circles the monument, planned to be 20 feet in diameter. The names on one of the fiberglass scrolls will face south because the Dakota traditionally believe the spirits of the dead rise on the fourth day and travel south.
On the other scroll was to be a poem about executions written in 1971 by the state's former human rights commissioner, Conrad Balfour. But that 20-line verse is what prompted the city council to back off endorsing the memorial two weeks ago. Among the criticized lines:
The day before the countryside had mourned theA few days after the council's action, a bland new poem was written by Katherine Hughes that is more to the liking of at least some councilmembers:
Remember the innocent dead,While several councilmembers have said the new poem is acceptable, Vernell Wabasha is withholding judgment. Nothing is "chiseled in stone," she said.
[Hughes's poem was the one finally accepted for the $110,000 memorial. A prayer by the late Dakota elder Eli Taylor is also included.]
The names of the 38 who were executed:
Ti-hdo-ni-ca (One Who Jealously Guards His Home)
Blast from the Past. At Daily Kos on this date in 2008—Rick Warren Doubles Down, Accuses Critics Of 'Christophobia'
|Rick Warren is doubling down and accusing his critics of "hate-speech" and "Christophobia."
Rachel Maddow has the video, and takes Warren to task for the hypocrisy of saying that it's unfair to call his views hateful while simultaneously accusing his critics of hate speech. Moreover, as Rachel notes, Warren flat-out lies about his comments comparing gay marriage to pedophilia and incest.
Setting aside Warren's role as inaugural invocation speaker (for a brief moment), I don't think there's any way to defend what he is now saying. I accept the proposition that it's possible to disagree on the issue of gay marriage without calling someone names.
A simple apology from Warren for having made the comparison probably would have made this whole controversy go away. But now he's doubling down, and it's just making matters worse.