Skip to main content

Many politicians will say that the first responsibility of a President is to ensure the national security.  I would note that the Preamble to the Constitution lists two other things BEFORE "provide for the common defense" -

"establish justice"

"insure domestic tranquility"

But I will grant for sake of discussion that a government that cannot provide security for its people will not long have the support of that people.

It is in part because of that we have placed so much emphasis on our military, to the point where it is now out of proportion to the real military needs of our nation, and its cost thereby distorts other issues of real national security.

Recently someone here who I greatly respect challenged me to write about the broader issues of national security.  This reflection is in response to that challenge.

Let me offer what responsibilities our government has to provide for the security of the nation.

And I will start with words from more than 3/4 of a century past.

On January 20.1937, Franklin Roosevelt gave his 2nd Inaugural Address, with the Great Depression still having a crushing impact upon many in this nation.   Allow me to quote an important part of that address:

I see a great nation, upon a great continent, blessed with a great wealth of natural resources. Its hundred and thirty million people are at peace among themselves; they are making their country a good neighbor among the nations. I see a United States which can demonstrate that, under democratic methods of government, national wealth can be translated into a spreading volume of human comforts hitherto unknown, and the lowest standard of living can be raised far above the level of mere subsistence.

  But here is the challenge to our democracy: In this nation I see tens of millions of its citizens—a substantial part of its whole population—who at this very moment are denied the greater part of what the very lowest standards of today call the necessities of life.

  I see millions of families trying to live on incomes so meager that the pall of family disaster hangs over them day by day.

  I see millions whose daily lives in city and on farm continue under conditions labeled indecent by a so-called polite society half a century ago.

  I see millions denied education, recreation, and the opportunity to better their lot and the lot of their children.

  I see millions lacking the means to buy the products of farm and factory and by their poverty denying work and productiveness to many other millions.

  I see one-third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, ill-nourished.

Our economic situation may not now seem as dire as it did then, but for far too many of our citizens, want and fear still dominate their lives.  

Earlier in that same speech FDR has noted

we must find practical controls over blind economic forces and blindly selfish men.
 That is still a problem of American society, and it is one that threatens real national security, for if people lose hope, if people feel abandoned by their government, the United States will cease to be a liberal democracy, and whatever may persist will no longer be what the Founders, for all their flaws and limits of vision, bequeathed us.In that same speech FDR said this:  
We are beginning to abandon our tolerance of the abuse of power by those who betray for profit the elementary decencies of life.

In this process evil things formerly accepted will not be so easily condoned. Hard-headedness will not so easily excuse hardheartedness. We are moving toward an era of good feeling. But we realize that there can be no era of good feeling save among men of good will.

And he also said this:
We are determined to make every American citizen the subject of his country's interest and concern; and we will never regard any faithful law-abiding group within our borders as superfluous. The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.
Now let me offer my own reflections on the elements of national security.

It would include true economic security for all willing and able to work, and provisions for those unable through no fault of their own to obtain work - whether because of age, infirmity, or local economic dislocation.   A society more concerned about protecting the wealth and power of the few while ignoring the basic economic needs of the many is not secure.

National security would include food security -  we would not allow the domination of our food supply by a limited group of massive corporations.  We would ensure that we did not so move towards monoculture that our food supply is at greater risk of blight and disease and pests.  

We would provide food security for families and individuals.  We would not cut nutrition support while continuing tax breaks for passive investors and wasteful expenditures on military systems.

We would guarantee comprehensive medical care for all - including dental, vision, hearing, and mental health.  Absent addressing this, first among our children, we limit the potential of our people to live productive lives and contribute to our society not merely economically but also morally and socially.

We would protect fiercely the natural bounty of this land that has enabled our nation to thrive.  WE would strictly regulate what gets discharged into the air we all breathe and the water upon which we depend for sustenance.  We would act aggressively to prevent further damage to the ecosystems upon which the very life on this planet depends.

We would view education as a chance for our people to develop their gifts and their interests as they deem fit and not to prepare them merely to be consumers and cogs in an increasingly corporatized world.

Our national security is threatened when key parts of our infrastructure are owned by foreign entities whose sole interest is profits they will take out of our nation.

Our national security is threatened when supposedly American corporations can export jobs to nations with low wages and few environmental regulations thereby impoverishing our own  while they destroy the world.

Our national security is under siege when super wealthy and corporate interests can control large portions of our political processes, distorting them for their private advantage at the expense of the rest of us and of the common good.

We need a national conversation.

We need many national conversations.

Perhaps after the tragedy of Sandy Hook Elementary we may begin to have one on the role of guns in American society.

What does America mean?  What is it that we are attempting to secure?  What role does each American play, what responsibilities do we have to each other?

I have in this reflection barely scratched the surface of the larger topic of national security.

But at least I am willing to have a discussion beyond the issue of how many weapons systems, the use of drones and enhanced interrogation methods.

What is this nation that we seek to keep secure?

Does not that question come first?

I return again to these words, all of them:

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

All of the items of that social contract are interrelated -  all must be remembered, all must be considered, not one at the expense of another.

Franklin Roosevelt challenged the nation at a time of major crisis, not only here but around the world.

The world is again, as it so often is, at a moment of crises -  plural

There are to be sure economic crises

There are concerns about terrorist acts and unstable nation-states

We have a serious environmental crisis almost beyond our power to address

We will not solve those problems for our nation by acting unilaterally, for our economy is intertwined with those of other nations, and our environment is not in a bubble.

We will not solve those problems for ourselves no matter how wealthy we may be as individuals, if we ignore the rest of our fellows, regardless of race,religion, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, documented status.

True national security will be possible only when we are able to see ourselves as a nation including all of us, not merely as a place where we can demand rights but then ignore our responsibilities to one another.

The Signers of the Declaration made a solemn commitment, with words that were not idle.  We should remember that commitment:

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

It was a pledge to each other, to a purpose beyond themselves as individuals.  

If we are to continue as a nation, we need that kind of national commitment.

Franklin Roosevelt recognized this.  Here are the five final paragraphs of that second Inaugural:

If I know aught of the will of our people, they will demand that these conditions of effective government shall be created and maintained. They will demand a nation uncorrupted by cancers of injustice and, therefore, strong among the nations in its example of the will to peace.

  Today we reconsecrate our country to long-cherished ideals in a suddenly changed civilization. In every land there are always at work forces that drive men apart and forces that draw men together. In our personal ambitions we are individualists. But in our seeking for economic and political progress as a nation, we all go up, or else we all go down, as one people.

  To maintain a democracy of effort requires a vast amount of patience in dealing with differing methods, a vast amount of humility. But out of the confusion of many voices rises an understanding of dominant public need. Then political leadership can voice common ideals, and aid in their realization.

  In taking again the oath of office as President of the United States, I assume the solemn obligation of leading the American people forward along the road over which they have chosen to advance.   

  While this duty rests upon me I shall do my utmost to speak their purpose and to do their will, seeking Divine guidance to help us each and every one to give light to them that sit in darkness and to guide our feet into the way of peace.

Let me repeat one part of what I have just quoted:  In our personal ambitions we are individualists. But in our seeking for economic and political progress as a nation, we all go up, or else we all go down, as one people.

If we want true national security, we will remember those words, and demand those who seek to lead us politically and economically also remember, and abide by, the spirit of those words.

Absent that, we will have no national security, for we will cease to be a nation, and become nothing more than a collection of disparate economic entities which value others only so far as we can see profit from them.

Then we will again approach what Hobbes described as the state of nature, a war of every man against every other man, and the life of man:  solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short

Peace?

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (26+ / 0-)

    "We didn't set out to save the world; we set out to wonder how other people are doing and to reflect on how our actions affect other people's hearts." - Pema Chodron

    by teacherken on Thu Dec 27, 2012 at 02:33:37 PM PST

  •  It comes down to this: We the people have to (11+ / 0-)

    take control away from the current plutonomy and make these things (that you suggest) happen; but WE need to make it happen, somehow.

    We need to unite, and confront the rampant, widespread, and endemic corruption that has taken hold of our entire political system, defeat it, and impose order, the rule of law,  reason, decency, back into the system.

    •  This is a "To Do List." (3+ / 0-)
      We need to unite, and confront the rampant, widespread, and endemic corruption that has taken hold of our entire political system, defeat it, and impose order, the rule of law,  reason, decency, back into the system.
      The internet is a useful tool----everything starts somewhere.

      The Onion says----scholars have discovered---the Mayan word for "Apocalypse" in fact---translates more accurately as: "Time of pale obese gun monsters."

      by lyvwyr101 on Thu Dec 27, 2012 at 03:22:47 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  The idea of those who need help... (4+ / 0-)

    Not being worthy of help because of needing it...

    is one of those ideas that is beyond ludicrous.

    It's circular logic that enhances those who started out with a leg up due to winning the lucky sperm contest.

    One of em that really gets me is how even the Army is starting to reward plutocrats.  It was quite easy to do... once they started rejecting people for OCS based off credit rating.

    I don't blame Christians. I blame Stupid. Which sadly is a much more popular religion these days.

    by detroitmechworks on Thu Dec 27, 2012 at 03:01:16 PM PST

    •  They aren't unworthy because they need help (0+ / 0-)

      they're unworthy because they don't have rich friends willing to help them.  

      States' rights? Corporate rights? Militia rights? Government rights? Hell no! Only individuals have rights. Proud lifelong human supremacist.

      by happymisanthropy on Thu Dec 27, 2012 at 03:39:46 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  The necessary conversation (0+ / 0-)

    ...about creating a real constitution that confers human rights, will not happen.

    The people are too terrified to have it.



    Denial is a drug.

    by Pluto on Thu Dec 27, 2012 at 03:08:53 PM PST

    •  disagree (0+ / 0-)

      that is in large part what fueled the massive turnout for Obama in 2008

      "We didn't set out to save the world; we set out to wonder how other people are doing and to reflect on how our actions affect other people's hearts." - Pema Chodron

      by teacherken on Thu Dec 27, 2012 at 03:30:06 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Ah. I did detect the inner glow of potential (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        a2nite, Larsstephens

        ...self-government in that moment.

        But, in the end it amounted to nothing more than the big game at the local sports bar. Since then our wars have expanded massively in intent and death and the nation has become thoroughly privatized.

        Americans know remarkably little about US war-making and destabiization efforts throughout the world

        The ultimate tactical goal of these efforts is control of non-devloped resources for the advantage of US Corporations. This is funded initially by the wealth transfers from the American people to the Defense Sector in the form of subsidies diverted from so-called "defense" spending -- a vast pool of more than half of all Federal revenues. In turn, this facilitates private profits from increased arms sales and funnels lucrative defense contract money to America's largest corporations -- from Fed-Ex to FritoLay.

        Only when we the people come together and create a real constitution that benefits the people -- instead of the slave-holder document we currently use -- will a true nation of the 21st century be born.



        Denial is a drug.

        by Pluto on Thu Dec 27, 2012 at 03:40:42 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  Well, "provide for the common defense" is a (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Larsstephens

    much more specific charge than "protect national security."
    Not only does "protect" assume a threat, but it proposes to address a problem by "covering" the victim of an attack. Of course, the word "common" has fallen out of fashion. And the nation, an amorphous entity, "covers a lot of territory," so to speak, even as it emphasizes the importance of "security"--i.e. tying things down or locking them up. In other words, the perception of threat serves as an excuse to restrict the population to be served. Behavior that was originally targeted at select categories of people (slaves, servants, wives, children, savages) can now be applied universally under the umbrella of equality and security.

    We organize governments to deliver services and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Thu Dec 27, 2012 at 04:26:16 PM PST

  •  We must hang together (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    shypuffadder

    or we will surely all hang separately.

    Thanks, Ken.

    Republicans want to make government small enough to fit in your vagina..

    by ramara on Thu Dec 27, 2012 at 08:14:52 PM PST

  •  A more perfect union (0+ / 0-)

    I would argue that the first thing the preamble to the Constitution says is "to form a more perfect union." Unfortunately, we do not worry about forming a more perfect union. I wish we did.

    Practice tolerance, kindness and charity.

    by LWelsch on Fri Dec 28, 2012 at 11:09:20 AM PST

    •  a comment on that (0+ / 0-)

      those words are the legal fiction that the Constitution is a continuation of the government under the Articles of Confederation which described itself in the beginning of its text as

      Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union
      and the rest of the clauses, beginning with "establish justice" are the purpose of that more perfect union.

      "We didn't set out to save the world; we set out to wonder how other people are doing and to reflect on how our actions affect other people's hearts." - Pema Chodron

      by teacherken on Sat Dec 29, 2012 at 11:23:52 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Check out the op-ed article (0+ / 0-)

        Let’s Give Up on the Constitution in today's New York Times. The article points out that

        In fact, the Constitution itself was born of constitutional disobedience. When George Washington and the other framers went to Philadelphia in 1787, they were instructed to suggest amendments to the Articles of Confederation, which would have had to be ratified by the legislatures of all 13 states. Instead, in violation of their mandate, they abandoned the Articles, wrote a new Constitution and provided that it would take effect after ratification by only nine states, and by conventions in those states rather than the state legislatures.
        because the founders violated their mandate I disagree with you.

        Practice tolerance, kindness and charity.

        by LWelsch on Sun Dec 30, 2012 at 08:55:04 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site