Skip to main content

I was poking around twitter tonight and got a rather rude forwarded tweet from The Heritage Foundation regarding some wasteful US food aid programs. The tweet – as seen below—claims major waste cited in a GAO report. Being I have nothing better to do, I printed out the report and actually read it. I found no such findings in the report. There is some mention that our international food aid programs may overlap in some countries, but the programs (USDA & USAID) coordinate to ensure they are not helping the same people or during the same time-frame.
 

The Heritage Foundation always finds WASTE, even when its not there. Then trumpets the solution, cut the program, screw the poor, hungry, and sick. Unfortunately, this report from the GAO cited progress for these two programs. How can they get it so wrong?

On the Heritage Foundation site (I won’t link to them) the below quote was cited from the 2012 GAO report;

The GAO reports that USAID and USDA’s efforts have “been fragmented and uncoordinated across the U.S. government” and that it “examined the extent to which these agencies’ non-emergency food aid programs pursue similar objectives.”
The actual complete sentences from the GAO report -Dec 2012 (my emphasis)
We previously reported that efforts to mitigate these factors have been fragmented and uncoordinated across the U.S. government. In response to your concerns about fragmentation, overlap, and duplication in USAID and USDA nonemergency food aid programs, we examined the extent to which these agencies’ nonemergency food aid programs pursue similar objectives.
Notice the current GAO report is actually re-quoting the original report from 2008 and the request from congress for further information. This new report (Dec 2012) is a progress report and is requested by multiple Rep’s including Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK). After reading the new report it clearly states that these agencies have made significant progress to address the issues cited in the 2008 report.

The new report finds that;

USAID and USDA share broad objectives for nonemergency food aid programs; however, we found that these agencies have established some processes to plan and coordinate country activities in efforts to limit overlap.
Summary Results (Snippets)
Geographic Focus: Some USAID and USDA nonemergency food aid programs were delivered in the same geographic areas. For example, in Guatemala, USAID’s Title II Development Assistance Programs and USDA’s McGovern-Dole (Food for Education) were both operating in the same geographic region, Baja Verapaz. In Uganda, USAID’s Title II Development Assistance programs and USDA’s Local and Regional Procurement Pilot programs were both operating in the same districts, Kitgum and Pader.
It sure is a shame that poor & hungry people reside in the same areas/countries. If only we could move them to different places, sigh.
Similar Activities: Some USAID and USDA nonemergency food aid programs carried out similar activities; however, in these cases the activities were either delivered to different participant groups or different locations, or implementation time lines varied. For example, in Guatemala, USDA’s Food for Education and USAID’s Title II Development Assistance programs both provided sanitary infrastructure (i.e., constructing latrines) and agricultural training. In Uganda, USDA’s Local and Regional Procurement Pilot and USAID’s Title II Development Assistance programs both included rehabilitation of rural roads, but USAID’s program in Guatemala benefited households, while USDA’s program benefited school children.
Hmmm... helping households and children, the horror, sigh.
Common Partners: Some USAID and USDA nonemergency food aid programs used common implementing partners to administer the programs.

According to these implementing partners, Mercy Corps and Share Guatemala, though program goals and objectives between these two agencies may overlap, the program participants do not. For example, Mercy Corps officials in Uganda told us that while the focus of both USAID Title II and USDA Food for Progress programs were smallholder farmers, the program participants varied because they lived in different geographic focus areas.

I just wanted to get the real information out. If someone puts out misleading quotes/tweets in order keep the “Government Wastes Our Money” curtain up, I have to set the record straight.

Thanx for listening…

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site