Skip to main content

Immediately after the Sandy Hook school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, out of control and often nonsensical debate about gun control made national headlines. After being silent for days, NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre held a press conference at which he did not accept any responsibility for the role played by firearms availability and “gun culture,” a culture heavily supported by the NRA, in the mass shooting that took the lives of 20 children, 6 adults, the shooter, and the shooter’s mother. Instead, LaPierre suggested that violent video games and movies are to blame, and that everyone would be safer if there had been more guns in the schools, including armed teachers and armed guards. This is certainly a proposal that the firearms manufacturers that fund the NRA, and whose executives sit on its board, would wholeheartedly support.

The “violent movies and video games” argument is particularly disturbing, not only because it shifts the blame away from real issues, but specifically because the argument LaPierre is making has been debunked in academic settings. I would encourage Mr. LaPierre to look at the work done by University of Massachusetts Professor Michael Morgan on media violence, and the Media Education Foundation documentary Mean World Syndrome, about which I’ve interviewed Professor Morgan on my show. The film outlines the clear reality of media violence: It doesn’t make people more violent, but it does make them more afraid.

We shouldn’t be surprised that the NRA wants to make a case for more guns rather than less. The NRA is simply a lobbying group for gun manufacturers. Their objective is not gun safety or reducing shootings, but rather getting good reviews from their clients – the companies that make guns. There is only one way that this happens:  With more guns being sold. It is more accurate to think of the NRA as a sort of US Chamber of Commerce for guns.

The idea that shootouts in schools where the “good” gun owners shoot “bad” gun owners are a solution is so patently absurd that it doesn’t require further discussion here. However, there have been a number of uninformed ideas about gun control circulating in recent weeks.  While I absolutely support gun control, regulation, and screening, we must not be distracted by the idea that so-called “assault weapons” are the problem. Most mass shootings, but more importantly, most gun-related individual homicides, which make up the overwhelming number of gun deaths in the US, are committed with handguns that would not be affected by an assault weapons ban like the one that expired a few years ago. Senator Diane Feinstein’s upcoming gun control bill plans to include some handgun regulations, but we will have to wait and see whether they will be at all significant.

Going back to the NRA press conference, Mr. LaPierre also suggested a national mental illness database as a possible solution to firearms violence. Putting aside potential HIPPA violations, it is indefensible to argue against full firearm and ammunition purchase documentation, 100% background checks with waiting periods, and closing the gun show and private sale loophole, while simultaneously arguing that a list of all people who take anxiety medication or see a therapist is needed and would prevent gun violence. By the way, this so-called “mental illness gun check” already kind of exists, and already doesn’t work.

As the Wall Street Journal has reported, during Bill Clinton’s first term Congress did pass a law that required states report mental health records to the FBI, so they could then be used to prevent those individuals from purchasing guns. However, the Supreme Court in 1997 threw out the mandate, saying states could choose to share or not share whatever information they wanted to. In short, most states are providing almost no records to the FBI, even though they presumably do have them. Further, 19 states have received “waivers” from the Justice Department that permit certain individuals to purchase guns, even though they’re on “the list.” Lastly, most individuals who commit shootings would never even meet the requirements to make it on the list in the first place, often never interacting with the mental health or legal systems. In short, we already have a version of LaPierre’s suggestion, which the Supreme Court told states not to worry about, which states ignore, and which individuals can circumvent to obtain guns anyway.

The solution is only partly in gun control. In the long term, a total paradigm shift is necessary when it comes to American culture and society such that people’s life expectations and experiences do not come together in a way that leads them to even get the idea of committing any kind of homicide, including the mass shootings at issue here. This is a longer discussion that can’t fit into 800 words.

David Pakman, host of the internationally syndicated political talk radio and television program, "The David Pakman Show," writes a monthly column. He can be reached at

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  hey david, (0+ / 0-)

    nice to see you again on dailykos buddy.

    Your diaries are always informative and I look up to you, Louis, Natan.  

    I am trying hard to get new members to your show. You are really cool bro :)

    I hope you all come to Baltimore soon.


  •  Hope this gets more eyes. It's important stuff. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    202-224-3121 to Congress in D.C. USE it! You can tell how big a person is by what it takes to discourage them. "We're not perfect, but they're nuts."--Barney Frank 01/02/2012

    by cany on Fri Dec 28, 2012 at 04:07:28 PM PST

  •  Ridiculous. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    DarthMeow504, kestrel9000

    He points out that blaming an object has been debunked, when the 'object' was violent movies and games; then supports aspects of gun control that rest upon blaming an object, when the object is a handgun.

    At least he references the disparity between people's life expectations and life experiences. Unions and collective bargaining and a new labor movement can help heal that chasm.

    It's safe to trust a sane person with the keys to nuclear weapons, but it's not safe to trust an insane person with the stuff in the kitchen.

    by JayFromPA on Fri Dec 28, 2012 at 05:09:14 PM PST

  •  Unfortunately, his assertions that aren't backed (0+ / 0-)

    up by any references are incorrect.  Almost all non-bought out scientists with relevant degrees believe climate change is real.  Similarly, virtually all relevant scientists who have studied the relationship between video game violent and violence have concluded that video games cause aggression and violence.

    The following Kos posts are relevant 1 2

    Reference number 2 is two statements made by top US violence researchers.  The first statement endorsed by hundreds of US scientists and scientific organizations in response to the CT shooting points out the causal link between video games and violence, as well as the link between assault weapons and increased numbers of deaths associated with rampage murderers.  The comprehensive statement also mentions numerous other factors that can reduce the US homicide and violent crime rates as well as bullying and other forms of aggression that occur in high rates in US schools.  It's important to mention that this statement is barely modified from statements made by the organization prior to shooting and yet it contains suggestions for how this tragedy could have been pointed at ever step of the way from better mental health services for young people, requirements that parents insure their children can't access guns, help for parents with troubled children, support for schools that are concerned about the behavior of a student or someone associated with the school as well advice for parents about violent video games.

    A second statement by one of the world's leading authorities on violence was written before anything was known about Adam Lanza.  Several shockingly accurate predictions are made including the suspicion that the young man was involved in playing violent video games.

    Reference 1 links to research and clinical organizations around the world that are concerned with violence.  These organizations have all concluded based on thousands of studies that media violence including video games can cause aggression and violence.  Some of the most disturbing evidence comes from brain scans of children exposed to video games which show neurological deficits that can cause learning disabilities as well as low impulse control.  Any parent who read these reports would be concerned for their child.  


Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site