Skip to main content

In the recent debate over the so-called "fiscal cliff," President Obama was reportedly at one point offering to raise the eligibility age for Medicare from 65 to 67 and Social Security. However, in view of the coming retirement crisis due to the decline in defined benefit plans guaranteeing a specific retirement income, this is a terrible idea. Given that proposals to cut Social Security and Medicare will be repeatedly floated in the coming debt ceiling and related budget fights, we need to understand just how bad an idea this is.

First, let's look at what Social Security and Medicare have done to elderly poverty in the U.S. over time, using the standard poverty line as our measure. Daniel R. Meyer and Geoffrey L. Wallace of the University of Wisconsin have published data on official poverty rates for those over 65:

Official poverty rate for the elderly by year

1968          25.0%
1990          12.1%
2006            9.4%

1968, of course, is just three years after the enactment of Medicare and Medicaid. We can see that elder poverty was halved between 1968 and 1994, and dropped at a slower pace through 2006. In the bad old days, one in four of the elderly lived in poverty: why would we want to go back to that when we are a much richer society today than we were in 1968?

Moreover, before we pat ourselves on the back for how well we have done, we need to consider alternative measures of poverty and the experience of other industrialized democracies. As Arthur Delaney and Ryan Grim report, the Census Bureau has developed a "Supplemental Poverty Measure" (SPM) that includes items such as out-of-pocket medical expenses, which affect seniors more than those under 65. Thus, while the SPM was only slightly higher for all individuals in 2009 than the official poverty measure (15.7% vs. 14.5%), for seniors the increase was from 8.9% to 16.1%.

As Meyer and Wallace relate, when the poverty line was first defined in the United States in 1963, it was approximately equal to 50% of median household income. Today, according to Smeeding et al., it is approximately just 30% of median household income. Meanwhile, the European Union has gone in the opposite direction, defining poverty as 60% of median income. Researchers comparing poverty cross-nationally generally use a 50% of median income standard. How does the U.S. stack up?

Here are Smeeding et al.'s figures for poverty rates in 2000 for all over 65 (figures eyeballed from Figure 1; no table provided):

Country                        Poverty rate

United States                 25%
Australia                        23%
United Kingdom            18%
Italy                              14%
Germany                       10%
Sweden                          8%
Canada                          6%

I guess we can take solace in the fact that Ireland has a substantially (20 percentage points) higher elder poverty rate for households only comprised of the elderly, as Smeeding reports in a separate paper. Otherwise, the comparison is pretty grim.

Yet what do the Very Serious People, as Paul Krugman calls them, want? At the very least, they want to cut Social Security by changing how inflation is calculated, and they want to raise the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67. At some points, it appeared the President would go along.

This is lunacy. As David Rosnick and Dean Baker (via David Cay Johnston) show, cuts to Medicare, such as Paul Ryan's plan, shift far more costs to beneficiaries than what government saves through the cuts. In fact, while the Ryan cuts save the government $4.9 trillion over 75 years, the elderly will pick up $34 trillion in new costs. As Johnston puts it, for every dollar in saving for the government, there will be approximately $6 in net losses to the country as a whole.

Where are seniors supposed to find $34 trillion? Fewer and fewer people will have real pensions, 401(k) plans are vulnerable to market swings, and the Very Serious People want to cut Social Security. The simple answer is that seniors will be worse off than seniors today, yet 47% of the electorate voted for people who would have cut Medicare now.

It's time to take these cruel cuts off the table permanently. What we will need in the future is an augmentation of Social Security, not cuts. We've got to make sure politicians get this through their heads.

Originally posted to Kenneth Thomas on Mon Jan 14, 2013 at 04:22 PM PST.

Also republished by Social Security Defenders.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

a gilas girl, bink, Alumbrados, paradox, Joe Bob, cslewis, coral, northsylvania, Chi, filkertom, grollen, slinkerwink, Liberal Thinking, badger, Emerson, MouseThatRoared, Pescadero Bill, kpardue, cotterperson, liz, Aspe4, TX Unmuzzled, xynz, opinionated, Zinman, Einsteinia, wonkydonkey, lippythelion69, susakinovember, Agathena, roses, pedrito, Clues, Nate Roberts, splashy, Subversive, Boppy, flatford39, hoof32, riverlover, annakerie, inclusiveheart, barbwires, Oaktown Girl, zerelda, rolet, Gowrie Gal, Los Diablo, ExStr8, bloomer 101, historys mysteries, radarlady, 3goldens, Jeffersonian Democrat, denise b, el dorado gal, newfie, stlawrence, chimene, irate, Militarytracy, Simplify, stagemom, Brooke In Seattle, Laurence Lewis, madmommy, reflectionsv37, fixxit, bleeding blue, Dem Beans, Ozzie, Bob B, Pluto, Cory Bantic, Paddy999, bently, Jim R, Jim P, begone, esquimaux, tarheelblue, Medium Head Boy, BlueInARedState, Son of a Cat, luckydog, Lefty Coaster, blueoasis, triv33, praenomen, gooderservice, bumbi, IL clb, midwesterner, doingbusinessas, Dreaming of Better Days, AllanTBG, Aaa T Tudeattack, One Pissed Off Liberal, SpecialKinFlag, camlbacker, SharonColeman, yoduuuh do or do not, beth meacham, LillithMc, Mary Mike, CTDemoFarmer, david mizner, DWG, bnasley, rantsposition, Aunt Martha, carpunder, pioneer111, CT Hank, leonard145b, bewild, Don midwest, rmonroe, also mom of 5, Roger Fox, OleHippieChick, Arlys, elwior, theunreasonableHUman, tofumagoo, No Exit, temptxan, petulans, shigeru, HarpboyAK, sagansong, David Futurama, statsone, cybrestrike, divineorder, bsmechanic, Don Enrique, maryabein, Zotz, shopkeeper, JesseCW, zaka1, papahaha, sfarkash, angel d, Words In Action, Nalepoc, ruscle, FogCityJohn, flitedocnm, The Jester, tb mare, beverlywoods, Egalitare, Jaimas, albrt, Betty Pinson, Floande, ZedMont, soaglow, Bluefin, allenjo, StateofEuphoria, Bob Duck, deeproots, david graeber, boomerchick, marleycat, akmk, Grandma Susie, peregrine kate, Marihilda, Oilwellian, stlsophos, DRo, PrometheusUnbound, tennegirl, quill, Only Needs a Beat, anodnhajo, orpurple, a2nite, 420 forever, Ginger1, Horace Boothroyd III, This old man, Mr Robert, Frisbeetarian, Syoho, radical simplicity, Canines and Crocodiles, lunachickie, splintersawry, Dumas EagerSeton, Lily O Lady, Chaddiwicker, atana, The grouch, argomd, jbob, JayRaye, Papuska, dear occupant, howabout, Fairlithe, central oregon progressive, downtownLALife, OldSoldier99, Gjetost

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site