Skip to main content

We are a violent nation.  A nation where far too many of us have worshiped at the alter of the God of Guns and the consequences of that worship, a culture steeped in violence, particularly violence blasted out of the barrel of a pistol, shotgun or rifle.  We have a long and deadly history when it comes to firearms.  But we need not be defined by our past.  And there is no better time to begin unshackling ourselves from that past than today.  But first, let us at least acknowledge those shackles.

It feels like every day we read about more gun shootings like this one at a community college in Kentucky:

Two people were killed and a third wounded when gunfire broke out in the parking lot of a community college in the eastern Kentucky mountains, authorities said.

Two people were being held, including the alleged shooter who opened fire with a semiautomatic pistol on Tuesday afternoon at the Hazard Community and Technical College, about 90 miles southeast of Lexington, police said.

This incident follows an earlier one at the Stevens Institute of Business & Arts in St. Louis in which a former student shot himself and a school administrator, though in that case both individuals were expected to survive.

A student with a violent past, a mental disability and a handgun wounded an official at the Stevens Institute of Business & Arts — where he had just lost financial aid — early Tuesday afternoon and then shot himself, officials said.

Greg Elsenrath, the financial aid director at the downtown career college, and his attacker were both seriously hurt and taken to St. Louis University Medical Center for surgery. A police source identified the gunman as Sean Johnson, 34.

Of course, it might just be that our national news media is paying more attention to gun violence since the infamous Newtown massacre.  In the past, many stories of shootings simply were not reported outside the local area where they occurred.  Gun violence was not a topic generally discussed by the national media, except in cases of mass killings such as those that occurred at Columbine High School and Virginia Tech, for example.  

After those incidents, there was always a round of intense media scrutiny regarding our country's gun violence, but eventually the uproar would subside, and the subject would be ignored, again, at least by the journalists, television reporters and pundits. Most deadly gun incidents were ignored except for brief reports by local media outlets.  Organized attempts by family members of victims and other activists to draw attention to America's deadly epidemic of gun violence drew little coverage.  You know what I mean.  Many of you undoubtedly have watched over the years brief televised reports of candlelight vigils for gun victims, or marches by local activists to try to bring awareness to the general public of the costs of gun violence in communities large and small around the country.  Yet the efforts by these families and groups to keep the the memory of the victims alive and promote solutions to this epidemic were usually ignored.  It remains, even now, a topic our news organizations would prefer to dismiss.

Despite 100,000 people on average killed or wounded by gun shootings each year, it's easy to see why most incidents never received national attention for our media. Research on gun violence was suppressed by Congress after a concerted lobbying effort by the NRA to terminate all government funded research by the CDC and other federal agencies on gun violence in the 1990's was extremely  successful.

After the government largely withdrew from financing gun violence research, private foundations picked up some of the slack for a while, researchers say. But they didn’t come close to making up the difference. Today, Rosenberg said, there’s “substantially less money available for [gun-violence] research.”

In a sign of just how much juice gun groups now have at the CDC, the agency asks researchers to let it know any time they’re publishing something on firearms—then gives the NRA a heads up, The New York Times reported in 2011. [...]

It’s not just the CDC that’s been hamstrung by the gun lobby. In 2003, Rep. Todd Tiahrt, a Kansas Republican, inserted an amendment into the law funding the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, restricting its ability to release firearms trace data.

The reason for the NRA's heavy handed assault on research by the CDC were two studies the agency had funded in the early nineties that demonstrated owning a gun did not make one safer.  On the contrary, the research found that households in which guns were present were at far greater risk of gun deaths from homicide and suicide than households without guns.

Although firearms are often kept in homes for personal protection, this study shows that the practice is counterproductive. Our data indicate that keeping a gun in the home is independently associated with an increase in the risk of homicide in the home. [...]

Despite the widely held belief that guns are effective for protection, our results suggest that they actually pose a substantial threat to members of the household. People who keep guns in their homes appear to be at greater risk of homicide in the home than people who do not. Most of this risk is due to a substantially greater risk of homicide at the hands of a family member or intimate acquaintance. We did not find evidence of a protective effect of keeping a gun in the home, even in the small subgroup of cases that involved forced entry.

You can see why the NRA fought so vigorously to destroy all potential research on the risks that owning a gun creates after these studies were published.  The whole basis of their argument was that owning a gun made you safer and saved lives.  Any rigorous scientific research by public health professionals that countered their message about guns reducing the risk of violence could not be tolerated, n or allowed to continue. Any data that countered their argument for gun ownership as the most effective means of home protection had to be ruthlessly suppressed.

And without such research, policy makers inclined to address the problem were often unable to gain much traction among the general public to counter the massive propaganda campaigns of gun lobbying organizations, such as the NRA.  At a result, "policymakers find themselves hampered by a lack of objective, scientific information on one of the country’s major public health threats—one which costs the country 31,000 lives and an estimated $100 billion per year."

Perhaps, things will be different this time.  Last night the parents of six year old Ben Wheeler, a victim of the Newtown massacre, made an impassioned plea on the Rachel Maddow Show that their son's death, and the deaths of the others murdered at Sandy Hook Elementary School, act as a catalyst for real reforms of our gun laws, and a public discussion on the real risks our gun culture poses to society.  They spoke on behalf of a group of parents whose children were slaughtered last month, a group whose members have pledged themselves to ending gun violence.

Their stated hope is that we finally come to terms with the true costs in lives destroyed and ruined in order to limit, if not prevent, future incidents of gun violence.  Despite their obvious grief over the loss of their youngest son, the Wheelers spoke out publicly about the group's mission.  They both told Rachel that they want Ben's death, and the deaths of his teachers and schoolmates, to mean something more than just another statistic.  You can watch the video of their interview with Ms. Maddow at this MsNBC link.  If you are not moved by their words, I can only assume you have no heart, or your own prejudices and ideological beliefs blind you to our nation's too long ignored problem with guns.

A month after Ben and 19 of his first-grade classmates were killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School, his parents, David and Francine Wheeler, joined with families of the other victims to honor their children by launching the Sandy Hook Promise, a pledge to work to end gun violence.

“I love the idea that this group has put forward that Sandy Hook, and Newtown will be remembered not for the tragedy, but for what started here,” David Wheeler said in an interview with Rachel Maddow Monday.

Francine Wheeler, wearing a necklace filled with some of Ben’s ashes, said that her family had stayed away from news footage of the shooting and had not kept track of the legislative debate over gun control spurred by the tragedy. However, she said the time was right to have a discussion about common sense steps to prevent a similar atrocity from ever happening again.

“It’s really not about your party right now, I really feel like it’s about our children. So I would say that at this moment my gut’s telling me that we need to continue talking about the children,” she said.

The question all of us have to ask is whether we want our children's future to be the same as our past?  A major component of any definition of the American dream, is that each generation works to create a society better than the previous one, a society that offers more opportunity, more justice, more happiness and less sorrow to our descendants than the one in which we lived our lives.  Over the last two hundred plus years of this Republic, we have often failed to achieve that goal, but we have had victories as well. We have made progress in the areas of civil rights, equality, and the low cruelty of mean spirited ideologues.  Once we were a nation that tolerated slavery, that turned a blind eye to lynchings and bigotry, that tolerated women being treated as chattels of their fathers, brothers and husbands, that ignored the plight of LGBT people.  We have advanced as a nation, even if at  times that advance was held back or even pushed down and suppressed.

 Still, even in the face of a political movement dedicated to eliminating all the gains we have made over our nation's history, we continue to make strides to create "a more perfect union."  Who would have believed same sex marriage was possible a scat two decades ago?  Not I for one, yet today we are witnessing changes that no one imagined.  It was the same in 1865 when slavery ended, and 1920 when the 19th amendment gave women the right to vote, and 1933  when FDR confronted economic injustice and the "money power," and 1954 when Jim Crow lost the first of many battles in the Supreme Court, and 1970 when the environmental movement led to the creation of the EPA.

We have the opportunity now to reach for another such victory, one that would make the world our children inherit a little bit safer, a little bit less destructive, a little bit less likely to cut the lives of our children short as a result of our fascination with firearms.  We've had this opportunity before - after Columbine, after Virginia Tech, after Tucson and Aurora, and the after the myriad of other deaths and slaughters that are a direct consequence of our failure to live up to our highest ideals and principles.  We have too often retreated in the face of the opposition of extremists, who continue to be relentless in their promotion of guns and a culture that nurtures hate, violence and opposition to reason.  Let us retreat no more.

Originally posted to Steven D on Wed Jan 16, 2013 at 06:16 AM PST.

Also republished by Shut Down the NRA.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (8+ / 0-)

    "If you tell the truth, you'll eventually be found out." Mark Twain

    by Steven D on Wed Jan 16, 2013 at 06:16:36 AM PST

  •  It's easy to say nothing can be done (5+ / 0-)

    if you're goal is to do nothing.

    Our people deserve better.

    "If you tell the truth, you'll eventually be found out." Mark Twain

    by Steven D on Wed Jan 16, 2013 at 06:26:49 AM PST

  •  This: (4+ / 0-)
    The question all of us have to ask is whether we want our children's future to be the same as our past?
    Is the complete answer to those naysayers who say "Nothing will work".

    On its own, they are correct, and the lie is in the assumption that they will always be correct.

    They are also correct about small changes being the "thin end of the wedge".

    You are damned right they are the thin end of the wedge because more is coming, and you ain't gonna like it.

    The pay-off is that my children, and my children's children might not have to grow up in a dangerous and violent society.

    Will only the criminals have guns? No! Law enforcement will have guns too, and that combined with a steadily decreasing supply, will change this country for the better.

    The gun lobby? I quit listening to them, pessimists all who believe that there is a problem that Americans can't solve.

    I don't believe it.

    I hope that the quality of debate will improve,
    but I fear we will remain Democrats.

    Who is twigg?

    by twigg on Wed Jan 16, 2013 at 06:54:26 AM PST

  •  How to be safer (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Everyone want to be safe.  Non-gun owners want to be safe.  Gun enthusiasts want to be safe.

    What is it that makes us less safe.  To both non-gun onwers and gun enthusiasts alike the answer is the same: gun owners (and here I use the term loosely to mean anyone in possession of a gun).  Non-gun owners worry that gun owners will shoot up a theatre or a shopping mall.  Gun enthusiasts worry that gun owenrs will come into their homes or attack them on the street.

    Given that we are made less safe by gun owners, it make sense to try to reduce the number of gun owners so we can be safer.

    And as you correctly point out, the empirc studies have shown us repeatedly that more guns are associated with more gun injuries.

    "The fool doth think he is wise: the wise man knows himself to be a fool" - W. Shakespeare

    by Hugh Jim Bissell on Wed Jan 16, 2013 at 07:45:05 AM PST

  •  Submission of my petition has resulted in much (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    push back and downright trashing from the dKos RkBR's.

    I ask that the gun owner's keep their guns, no if's and's or but's.  The RkBRers rush to tell me of the many extenuating circumstances that would excuse them from keeping their gun.

    Only they can control their gun.  I can't control their gun.  By arguing that they can't control their gun under many circumstances totally beyond their control, they argue that guns are uncontrollable.

    Please sign my petition, make them keep saying guns are not controllable until they hear what they are saying.

    Sign my White House Petition Enforce the KEEP in the Second Amendment We don't have a problem with gun control, we have a problem with gun owners controlling their guns.

    by 88kathy on Wed Jan 16, 2013 at 07:58:35 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site