Skip to main content

"I'm not personally, at this stage, ready to get rid of the 60-vote threshold. With the history of the Senate, we have to understand the Senate isn't and shouldn't be like the House."

Senator Harry Reid as quoted by Ezra Klein

Why not?

Senator Reid never explains exactly what would be the great harm in having a Senate that is like the House. I fail to see the danger that would come to the Republic by having the Senate behave like a normal legislature and function with relative efficiency.

The Senate certainly wasn't initially like the House. In the beginning of the Republic, Senators were elected by state legislatures, not by the people. But over time, people came to think that, in fact, the Senate should be more like the House. As in accountable to the people. Today's Senate today certainly isn't like the House. The House, no matter whom is in control of it, gets things done. The House legislates by majority vote the way a legislative body is supposed to, more or less. I suppose Senator Reid doesn't think this is a healthy objective of democratic government because the only way you get it is with simple majority rule.

The worst thing about Senator Reid's statement here is how cavalierly he abondons the idea of majority rule. Now, he has effectively declared that anything that does not have 60 votes isn't fit to pass. It isn't unconstitutional to do this for the constitution doesn't explicitly require majority votes to pass law. However, this is a terrible, terrible way to think about democracy. There is no body of government in the world that can function effectively if even the most routine matters require a super-majority. We aren't talking amending the constitution or ratifying a treaty. We are talking budgets. Or who will be commissioner or railroads. Or what is the official name of your local post office. Mitch McConnell would be well within his right to demand 60 votes for everything. Why? Leader Reid says so.

No democracy can function with routine supermajorities. Wide consensus isn't possible in this or any political climate. Not for very long at least. Instead, there will be breakdown and dysfunction. That is the alternative to majority rule. One must wonder what will become of the Vice President in his role as Senate tiebreaker since, at least under Reid's leadership, there wont be any ties to break.

Senator Reid has declared that his title is insufficient. Super-Majority Leader is what he needs, or else don't expect much. Of course, when he did have that title, he still didn't get a great deal done. Let us hope, for the sake of this republic, that a future Senate leader dismisses rule by super majority once and for all.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site