Skip to main content

“It’s amnesty that America can’t afford,” Barletta said Monday. “We have to stop people from coming in illegally. This will be a green light for anyone who wants to come to America illegally and then be granted citizenship one day.”

“I hope politics is not at the root of why we’re rushing to pass a bill. Anyone who believes that they’re going to win over the Latino vote is grossly mistaken,” Barletta said. “The majority that are here illegally are low-skilled or may not even have a high school diploma. The Republican Party is not going to compete over who can give more social programs out. They will become Democrats because of the social programs they’ll depend on.”

Think Progres had this wonderful quote and a brief report on Lou Barletta, who recently stated that immigrants were essentially government dependents that were too uneducated to be Republican voters. They were going to go where the handouts were.

I'm adopted. This should be obvious to anyone wondering why I'm six feet tall and white, and at family reunions everyone else is five foot five and brown. I have the interesting experience of being the first college graduate in my family. Not only the first college graduate, but the first person with a masters, and soon I will be completing my dissertation for doctoral degree. I vote Democrat. Much of my family votes Republican. I'm not concerned with the why, what I'm concerned with is the implication that just because somebody immigrated here from Mexico or another Latin country, that they're somehow dumb dependents.

If I count right, I have at least four aunts and three uncles. Added to my mother, that makes eight children my grandmother had after coming to America. She wasn't a government dependent, and neither was my family. My grandmother worked every day of her mother held multiple jobs to contribute to the family. All my uncles served honorably in the U.S. military. This in the second generation of a Hispanic immigrant family.

My family wasn't lazy. They earned their way in the United States. They worked, hard, to make their living. The government didn't give so much to them that they didn't give back. They gave back through their labor. They paid in taxes. They paid by serving in war during the Vietnam Era. The ironic part is that, despite what men like Barletta imply about my grandmother and uncles or aunts, that my family votes for his party. I do understand the why. I disagree, but its their choice.

The point, though, is that they are not what this man claims they are. They are not lazy. Hey are not uneducated. They have back to the U.S. And no man, from his privileged position in Washington, gets to insinuate that my family didn't work hard to make it. I wonder if this man has ever spent extended time in a place like the south side of San. Antonio, where some people had no heating, maybe a window air condition unit, and had a three room house for a family of eight or nine. I wonder if he has spent extended time living in a place with broken pavement, street violence, no access to libraries or book stores, underfunded schools and little economic opportunity.

Here's the solution to your Hispanic problem, Republicans. If you want their vote, treat them like human beings. Stop calling them dumb and lazy. They didn't come to America to be dependent, but to achieve economic success. Invest into their neighborhoods, ease their tax burden, allow them to rise up the economic ladder, fight so they don't face discrimination under the law, put more money into their schools, make it easier for them to vote, provide affordable and easily accessible medical care. The solutions to your problem are endless. The problem is that you're not the party that wants to embrace them.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Shockwave, poison kitchen

    by DAISHI on Tue Jan 29, 2013 at 01:01:33 PM PST

  •  The problem is Republicans needed a boogie man (0+ / 0-)

    They needed someone to scare their base into voting them into office. All the strum und drang over the 'Gay Agenda' was running out of steam, so they needed something else to get out the vote.

    Have you noticed that all of the concern over illegal immigrants just exploded onto the political scene out of nowhere? One day, nothing, the next day we were all under threat from the illegals who were mobbing the country. Anybody else scratch their head and say 'The heck did all this come from?"

    The Republicans had used the fear of blacks (remember the Willie Horton ad?) and then the specter of all those gays (gasp) getting married, then they turned to the fear of those people over there speaking Spanish (why aren't they speaking English?), all to strike fear into their older, rural, white, evangelical voting base. The problem is the Republican failed to take into account that they were targeting the fastest growing population group in the country and that their traditional base was shrinking by the day. So now they are in a terrible bind. If they oppose immigration reform they will lose even more of the growing Latino electorate. If they embrace immigration reform they will have to explain to their base why they are helping the very people they have been warning us all about for years.  This is going to be interesting.

    "Life is too important to be taken seriously" Oscar Wilde

    by Annie B on Tue Jan 29, 2013 at 01:24:28 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site