Skip to main content

With apologies to another entry that I can't seem to find.

The national organizations' decision to "punt" gay scout/ adult leader membership to individual units, if it actually happens, is fantastic news. To understand this, you have to understand how scouting is organized. While the national and regional organizations get the press, the heart of scouting is entirely local. Each unit (troop, crew or pack depending on boy scouts, venturing or cub scouts) is organized by a "chartering organization". The chartering organization selects and vouches for the adult leaders and sets the unit policies - within national guidelines. The units promise to follow scout rules on things like youth protection, advancement, health and safety, and unit structure (a troop is made of patrols,...)  While there are national standards and policies for the adults, ultimately it is the responsibility of the local community - which knows the adults to vouch for them.  (there is a background check that national performs, but that won't catch everything). While units can make mistakes, this is actually a good idea because who knows the volunteer better than his local community?

I have known adult homosexuals who would make great scout leaders, and known adult heterosexual adult leaders who should never be near scouts (not for sex, but because they were bullies and lead by intimidation rather than letting the scouts lead themselves).

If you are a scout or adult leader in good standing with a unit, then you are a scout or adult leader in the BSA.  So if the palaeolithic knuckle dragging unit troop 666, doesn't admit gays, and the enlightened unit troop 777 does (I don't think are real troop numbers and my apologies if they're your unit), then the knuckle dragger's have to accept the presence of members of troop 777 at district, council, and national events - whether they like it or not.  

Venturing (high school and college age) already works something like this. Some units are co-ed, some are all male and some are all female.  The choice is up to the chartering organization.  But if you are a venturer, then you're a venturer and if you attend a multi-crew district event, it does not matter if some other unit would not accept you for being a gender they don't want.

Their could be some conflict at Eagle scout boards of review (the final step in advancement) where at least one member of the board of review comes from a unit other than the scout's. It would be an automatic accepted appeal if a scout in good standing was rejected for a personal quirk that was accepted by his unit and followed national guidelines. If national says a unit can accept gay scouts then rejecting a gay scout, otherwise in good standing, for being gay and unacceptable to your unit, would mean that scout would be able to appeal and revoke your decision.  This is just like rejecting a scout for being black, having blond hair, or being a different faith - all of which would be immediately overturned.

While it sounds weasily, letting individual chartering organizations to set their own policies avoids a lot of problems. Let the homophobes march to their own drummer, off into the sunset.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site