Skip to main content

In case you thought the Senate rules reform of 2013 was going to make President Obama's judicial nominees sail through the Senate like shit though a goose, think again.

Yesterday, the Senate Judiciary Committee met to consider 3 Circuit Court nominees:

Robert E. Bacharach, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit

William J. Kayatta, Jr., to be United States Circuit Judge for the First Circuit

Richard Gary Taranto, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit

http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/...

You'll never guess what happened. Or if you have any connection with reality, maybe you will.

First, a little background about the history of these nominees. These are the first 3 of 33 nominees left over from last year to be considered by the Judiciary Committee. All 3 are considered non-controversial nominees and are supported by their home state senators from ME & OK.

1st Circuit Court of Appeals
William J. Kayatta, Jr.     
Nominated 01/23/12
Hearing Date: 03/14/12
Reported unanimously by Committee: 04/19/12

10th Circuit Court of Appeals
Robert E. Bacharach
Nominated 01/23/12
Reported by unanimouslyCommittee: 06/07/12

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Richard Gary Taranto
Nominated 11/10/11
Reported unanimously by Committee: 03/29/12

http://judicialnominations.org/...

Of these 3, only Bacharach made it to the Senate floor for a vote in 2012. The unsurprising result:

On July 26, 2012, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid filed for cloture on Bacharach's nomination.[2] A cloture vote held on July 30, 2012, failed by a vote of 56-34, with 3 senators voting present, including both Oklahoma Senators, Tom Coburn and James Inhofe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/...

Thanks to epic delaying tactics (blue slips, committee delays, filibusters, cloture votes, and the Thurmond Rule) by Senate Republicans since 2009, there are 87 judicial vacancies as of today. 19 more vacancies are pending later in 2013, and 35 nominees are pending for those 106 lifetime appointments.
http://www.uscourts.gov/...
http://www.uscourts.gov/...

It's now 2013, the "Thurmond Rule" is in the rear-view mirror, Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell have sung kum-ba-ya over the latest Senate rules compromise, and these nominees have had their lives on hold for more than a year waiting for the Senate to move on their nominations.

So what happened yesterday?

Bacharach and two other nominees were on Thursday's agenda of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Sen. Charles Grassley, of Iowa, the top Republican on the panel, asked that the votes be delayed for a week.
http://newsok.com/...

Senator Grassley's contention is that the committee is "offending 3 new members" by not having full hearings for these nominees (who have been pending for a year and were reported unanimously by the committee 8-10 months ago), and that Republicans are helping to move things along by not demanding those hearings. Really.

You can watch the hearing here - the meat of the Leahy/Grassley discussion is from the 29:00 minute to 31:20 minute mark.

http://www.senate.gov/...

Senator Leahy said Republicans are welcome to demand full hearings, and that he will simply schedule them to start Friday morning and they will run straight through Saturday, Sunday, and Monday until they are done.

Of course, Grassley wants no part of that working-over-the-weekend thing. He'd rather just take another week out of the lives of all of Obama's nominees. After all, this delay backs up all 30 of the other nominees left from 2010, 2011, and 2012 another week.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site