Skip to main content

Despite his less than steller performance at his confirmation hearing last week, Chuck Hagel is still on track for an easy confirmation, especially after picking up another key GOP supporter in Mike Johanns (his Senate successor in Nebraska). So naturally, since much of the Senate GOP has the maturity and emotional stability of three year olds, we're getting talk of a filibuster. Here's Yertle the Turtle on the option:

McConnell said opposition to the former Republican senator leading the Pentagon was growing.

"Whether that means he will end up having to achieve 60 votes or 51 is not clear yet," the Kentucky senator, who is seeking re-election, said Saturday at the opening of his campaign headquarters in Louisville.

Now, that might seem worrisome to Hagel backers, but heres a key nugget later in that piece that signals McConnell is all talk and no action:

Democrats hold a 55-45 advantage in the Senate and two Republicans have announced theri support for Hagel - Sens. Thad Cochran of Mississippi and Mike Johanns of Hagel's home state of Nebraska. Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., a member of the leadership, said he would oppose Hagel, but would not back a filibuster.
If a member of the GOP Senate leadership like Blunt is not going along with a filibuster scheme, things don't look good for its chances. And that was before this dropped:
Republican Sen. John McCain, a sharp critic of Chuck Hagel's nomination as defense secretary, said Monday he will not support a filibuster of President Barack Obama's pick, even though he declined to say whether he intends to vote for confirmation.

"I don not believe a filibuster is appropriate and I would oppose such a move,"
McCain told reporters Monday, two days after Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell raised the possibility of forcing a showdown vote.
And it wasn't just McCain. Here's some more GOP reactions:
"It would be unprecendented for the Senate not to allow an up-or-down vote on a president's Cabinet nomination, but I haven't made any decision about a vote," said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said she was "no inclined to support a filibuster regardless of my ultimate decision," on the nominee.

Republican Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina, who opposes Hagel's nomination, said he would not support a filibuster.

Even Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who suggested the administration re-evaluate its choice, said "filibustering is something I do very reluctantly."

Translation: "Mitch, you're on your own." (Or as far as Graham's concerned, "I do nothing without my dear snugglebunny Johnny's consent.")

Now, who knows why McCain is getting cold feet on a filibuster (perhaps he doesn't want more bad press after his epic Twitter fail today), but his refusal to back a filibuster pretty much ensures that Hagel is headed for confirmation. As Josh Marshall makes it plain:

Which means about as clearly as can be that this drama (farcical drama, but drama) is over.
Sorry, GOP. I know you don't like Hagel, but unless you can dredge up images of him in a Superman costume, looks like you're stuck with him.
Poll

Will Chuck Hagel be filibustered?

3%2 votes
54%36 votes
4%3 votes
6%4 votes
9%6 votes
22%15 votes

| 66 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site