Skip to main content

in this New York Times column, which I highly recommend.

He starts by noting that Eric Cantor last week gave what his office touted as a major speech, and that we should be glad they so informed us,

Otherwise, a read of the speech might have suggested that he was offering nothing more than a meager, warmed-over selection of stale ideas.
Would that staleness were the worst one could say about the speech and its contents.  In the second and third paragraph he drills down and makes clear what is wrong, when he writes of Cantor and the Republicans
these days his party dislikes the whole idea of applying critical thinking and evidence to policy questions. And no, that’s not a caricature: Last year the Texas G.O.P. explicitly condemned efforts to teach “critical thinking skills,” because, it said, such efforts “have the purpose of challenging the student’s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.”

And such is the influence of what we might call the ignorance caucus that even when giving a speech intended to demonstrate his openness to new ideas, Mr. Cantor felt obliged to give that caucus a shout-out, calling for a complete end tofederal funding of social science research. Because it’s surely a waste of money seeking to understand the society we’re trying to change.

But there is much more.  You need to read it.

Let me offer a few additional thoughts.

Krugman calls out Cantor and the Republicans and Cantor on topics such as medical research and climate research.  He mentions the Republican attempts to suppress a Congressional Research Service study that showed clearly the lack of any magical economic results in tax cuts for the wealthy (although clearly, even if Krugman does not mention it, those wealthy supporters of the GOP agenda benefit mightily from those cuts).

He then writes this cogent paragraph:  

Do actions like this have important effects? Well, consider the agonized discussions of gun policy that followed the Newtown massacre. It would be helpful to these discussions if we had a good grasp of the facts about firearms and violence. But we don’t, because back in the 1990s conservative politicians, acting on behalf of the National Rifle Association, bullied federal agencies into ceasing just about all research into the issue. Willful ignorance matters.
I will let you read his final paragraph on your own, where he reiterates his title rather forcefully.

But I do want to focus on his penultimate paragraph:  

The truth is that America’s partisan divide runs much deeper than even pessimists are usually willing to admit; the parties aren’t just divided on values and policy views, they’re divided over epistemology. One side believes, at least in principle, in letting its policy views be shaped by facts; the other believes in suppressing the facts if they contradict its fixed beliefs.
That is not just ignorance, it is willful ignorance.  It is, in my opinion, one reason for the hostility to the existence of institutions that might teach critical thinking (public schools, universities) or challenge those fixed beliefs (scientists and social scientists who actually examine the evidence).   It is why so much of their base frames their political expression in theological terms, thereby asserting that those beliefs come from some "higher authority" and thus are not subject to falsifiability or open to question.

Of course, it just happens to be convenient that those who assert such fixed beliefs seem to benefit socially, economically and in control of political power by those beliefs they do not want challenged.  

that is bad enough.

But then there are the likes of Eric Cantor, who surely knows the unreality of the blather he puts forth, who as a leader of his party in the House allows the likes of Paul Broun to sti on of all things the Science Committee.

The Ignorance Caucus indeed.

Read the Krugman.

Pass it on.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

sdf, RichM, Thumb, oofer, filkertom, ferg, glitterscale, Liberal Thinking, importer, Emerson, karlpk, LEP, hnichols, Heart of the Rockies, opinionated, Zinman, TracieLynn, ask, Texknight, psnyder, TexDem, Sychotic1, kalmoth, Liberaljentaps, walkshills, FlyingToaster, zerelda, Sembtex, glattonfolly, Leaves on the Current, Josiah Bartlett, Gowrie Gal, maybeeso in michigan, marina, radarlady, Tinfoil Hat, el dorado gal, qofdisks, Alice Venturi, basquebob, Dobber, Kevskos, ScottAC, Rusty in PA, Jim R, Jim P, BachFan, Pacifist, cybersaur, Mr Bojangles, profundo, seefleur, The Hindsight Times, JVolvo, Preston S, onionjim, Helpless, inner light, CA Nana, blueoregon, SD Goat, bstotts, Elasg, Temmoku, Aaa T Tudeattack, Thinking Fella, One Pissed Off Liberal, Philip Woods, Habitat Vic, Loudoun County Dem, moodyinsavannah, Debs2, ColoTim, terabytes, LamontCranston, Kayak, AnnArborDem, millwood, carpunder, Rumarhazzit, GeorgeXVIII, JML9999, TomP, Empower Ink, MKinTN, Arlys, Involuntary Exile, elwior, treesrock, monkeybrainpolitics, Lujane, tofumagoo, carver, J V Calin, petulans, luckylizard, pelagicray, Blueslide, Mayfly, gsenski, MrsTarquinBiscuitbarrel, bleuet, Glacial Erratic, nchristine, lostinamerica, Zotz, DefendOurConstitution, bfitzinAR, papahaha, kevinpdx, Keith Pickering, 57andFemale, jfromga, Just Bob, The Jester, UTvoter, Crabby Abbey, gosoxataboy, elginblt, ItsSimpleSimon, DiegoUK, Betty Pinson, orlbucfan, kenwards, ericlewis0, cocinero, Glass Navel, slice, dot farmer, Mac in Maine, praying manatheist, annominous, acramer, I love OCD, coquiero, nervousnellie, sostos, Buckeye Nation, Mr MadAsHell, Bluerall, CoExistNow, Mark Tapley, midnight lurker, wintergreen8694, stevie avebury, zenox, stlsophos, dradams, DRo, Cpqemp, Azazello, Laurel in CA, IowaBiologist, a2nite, Deep Texan, 420 forever, hotheadCA, Victim of Circumstance, artmanfromcanuckistan, Leonhard Euler, Dumas EagerSeton, TheLawnRanger, MarkW53, Lily O Lady, unfangus, entrelac, Ree Zen, Icicle68, BadKitties, k9kiki, Kay Observer2, OregonWetDog, TheDuckManCometh, central oregon progressive, Capt Crunch

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site