Skip to main content

Stupid people have the right to vote.  Stupid people propel our consumer economy and waste money on myriad things because they are stupid shoppers.  Stupid people have the right to own guns, lots of guns.  Stupid people have free speech.  So, no surprise, in our representative democracy (aka republic) even the most stupid citizens deserve to be represented in government.  God has done this by giving them the Republican Party with lots of stupid politicians running and ruining our nation.

Now we see leading Republicans working hard to rebrand, remessage, rebuild and separate themselves from Tea Party extremists.  This mighty effort is just another example of how stupid and delusional Republicans are.  The pitiful do not deserve our pity, nor respect.  They fail at every turn to intelligently recognize the many truths that explain why they are having so many problems with so many segments of the US population.  Now they create new lies in a feeble attempt to bury the many stupid statements and boldface lies Republican candidates vomited on the public in the past election cycle.  They want us to blame just a few of the most idiotic Republicans that lost important elections and in general Tea Party enthusiasts, while the greater truth is that the Party platform and the endless statements of Mitt The Loser Romney, the presidential primary Republican candidates and the leaders of the Party in Congress were as damaging.

And rather than fess up to all the crap they dumped on the nation, Republicans now are trying to con the public that they have seen the light.  They are more than delusional; they are stupid and politically inept.  It is as if they have so long worked so hard to appeal to the most stupid Americans that they are brain dead and can only speak stupid.

Sadly, the good news for them is that there are millions of utterly stupid Americans that will continue to vote for Republicans, but not enough, thankfully, to put one in the White House, though through rigged congressional districts they can still win lots of seats in Congress.  Stupid deserves stupid, so they deserve Republican politicians and all the destruction of the nation they continue to unload.  But not the rest of us.

It is all about winning elections and nothing to do with principles when it comes to Republicans reinventing themselves.  It is all about crafting new lies to deceive voters.

Krugman was correct: “One side [Democrats] believes, at least in principle, in letting its policy views be shaped by facts; the other [Republicans] believes in suppressing the facts if they contradict its fixed beliefs.  … for all the talk of reforming and reinventing the G.O.P., the ignorance caucus retains a firm grip on the party’s heart and mind.”

Whether it is immigration policy, taxes, the budget deficit and national debt, health care, and our key social programs, Republican politicians, especially in Congress, say the stupidest things.  What the nation needs is not some phony repackaged Republican Party but national recognition that voting for most Republicans is an act of utter and complete stupidity.  If only the various Tea Party groups would drop their stupid thinking about things that have nothing to do with fiscal and economic matters and align with the Libertarian Party.  Then we would have the beginnings of a badly needed alternative to the Democrats.  The grand strategy of the Tea Party crowd to take over the Republican Party has been fundamentally flawed, mainly because of so much emphasis on social issues.  They should have worked to make the Libertarian Party more powerful.

Here is some advice for Republican politicians: Start crafting your policy positions, party platform and messages on the basis you are trying to appeal to intelligent, well informed citizens in all demographic groups who are not addicted to blathering conservative talk radio stars and FOX News.  Stop advocating far right positions on abortion and contraception, gay rights, and other issues that clearly only appeal to dumb, white men and racists, and also positions on taxes and spending that benefit corporations and the top few percent on the economic ladder.

Kurtz was correct in noting Republicans “losing hand that constantly made it appear that the party was holding the economy hostage to protect tax breaks for the rich.”

Rubio, Christie and Jeb Bush, of course, are good examples of impressive Republicans who clearly do not cater to stupidity.  For a successful future, the Republican Party needs to clean its own house and get rid of their stupid politicians if they ever want to appeal to a broad cross section of the American population.

A danger-ahead-sign is that since 2004 young voters have voting for Democrats by larger margins than previous young generations.  The nonpartisan Pew Research Center reported in November that under-30 voters are “the only age group in which a majority said the government should do more to fix problems.”

Advocating limited government is fine as long as it also means a responsive, kind and truthful government serving the needs of non-rich citizens and not catering to corporate interests, nor depending on big money from the superrich.  And it requires the inevitable loss of stupid citizens on the far right.  Political power must be earned.  Time for Republicans to face reality.  Pick your political winners and drop your losers.  Shift emphasis from winning elections by any means to intelligently governing the nation.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  People who congregate under the Republican (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    umbrella are people who like to be told what to do and to refuse to do what they are told. That's their idea of choice -- to reject and obstruct what is being suggested.
    However, since that is their modus operandi, they fully expect others to do the same. So, since they are also mimics, they tell people what to do, not really expecting them to comply either. Everybody gets to just say no.

    Democrats, by and large, are doing. They want to get things done. If somebody tells/asks them to do something, they give it a try, if it is at all possible. The result is that we had Clinton ram through NAFTA and welfare deform and bank regulation liberalization and a surplus in the national accounts and an Iraq that had been contained but was battered and bruised. So, because Americans believe everybody deserves a turn, we got Bush/Cheney who decided to give all the surplus back to their buddies and take Iraq out of its misery by finishing the job -- pound the place to smithereens, set up a permanent U.S. headquarters in the middle East and let the good buddies from Texas drill for oil. Oh, and the agribusiness people would get a shot at making the deserts bloom and grow more grain in Mesopotamia.

    The housing bubble burst during Bush/Cheney, but that was the third iteration of land/housing speculation. The S&Ls did it in the eighties, capital gains reforms gave it another jolt in the nineties and then low long-term interest rates set off a scramble for speculative gambles. Adjustable rate mortgages that were insured, if not by the government, by the financial industry, seemed like a sure winner. And then everybody got cold feet and decided to collect from people who'd been living off their loans. So, Georgia has over fifty failed banks.

    People who don't actually know what they want should not be given what they ask for. And we should definitely not be basing decisions on how much things cost.

    If Republicans are going to have a choice, they have to obstruct. If they go along, they're doing what they are told.
    We're going to have to get what needs doing done without them.

    We organize governments to deliver services and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Fri Feb 15, 2013 at 03:02:07 PM PST

  •  Good read. Tipped, despite (0+ / 0-)
    Rubio, Christie and Jeb Bush, of course, are good examples of impressive Republicans who clearly do not cater to stupidity.
    It's not that clear to me.  

    Political compass: -8.75 / -4.72

    by Mark Mywurtz on Fri Feb 15, 2013 at 03:30:53 PM PST

  •  I don't know (0+ / 0-)

    Rubio, Christie and Jeb Bush, of course, are good examples of impressive Republicans who clearly do not cater to stupidity.


    the third one you list there has a brother whose picture is next to the definition of stupid in the dictionary.

  •  So God Made Republicans. (0+ / 0-)

    He also made ebola, syphilis, guinea worms and botflies. I'm torn on whether the former group or the latter is more disgusting and horrible.

    The last time the Republicans were this radical, they were working to elect former slaves to Congress. What a difference a century and a half makes!

    by jayjaybear on Fri Feb 15, 2013 at 05:38:27 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site