Skip to main content

You don't need to spend any money.  You don't need congress to act.  All you have to do is demonstrate leadership by challenging Americans (again and again) to help lower our carbon footprint. Inform  Americans that one of the easiest ways to do so is to

                 eat less animal products (particularly beef and pork);

and, to buy the ones they do eat from environmentally sustainable, local sources when possible.

Mr. President, doing so is the right thing to do for both future generations of Americans and the other nations of our world.  Like many, I was surprised to learn of the impact of the industrialized livestock production processes on the environment and our country's carbon footprint.

The UN study from 2006 entitled, "Rearing cattle produces more greenhouse gases than driving cars, UN report warns" is thorough and convincing (see link below).

Rearing cattle produces more greenhouse gases than driving cars, UN report warns

Then, in 2009, a second study was done for the World Bank with even more alarming figures.

Study claims meat creates half of all greenhouse gases

A new report done for the World Bank in 2012 led the Managing Director of the IMF to comment "unless we take action on climate change, future generations will be roasted toasted, fried and grilled" at the most recent World Economic Forum in Davos.

IMF-chief--Unless we take action on climate change future generations will be roasted toasted fried and grilled

The President of the World Bank, Jim Yong Kim, urged you to act to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in a January 24, 2013 Washington Post Opinion:

" Even as global climate negotiations continue, there is a need for urgent action outside the conventions. People everywhere must focus on where we will get the most impact to reduce emissions and build resilience in cities, communities and countries.

Strong leadership must come from the six big economies that account for two-thirds of the energy sector’s global carbon dioxide emissions. President Obama’s reference in his inaugural address this week to addressing climate and energy could help reignite this critical conversation domestically and abroad. "

Washington Post Op-Ed -- Make climate change a priority

Industrialized livestock production puts extreme pressure on our natural resources as well.  To produce the beef that we ate in 2012, we may have used 1.3 trillion gallons of water.  Countless more are polluted with herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, antibiotics, sewage, etc.

I applaud former President Bill Clinton and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel for the example they have set by moving to a plant based diet and speaking out about the health benefits.  This type of diet (vegan) keeps you food carbon footprint low and allows one to support, local sustainable farming which is important if we are to arrest climate change.

On the other hand, a lot of people, like me, don't have heart disease or want to exclude all animal products from their diets.  And, I have heard that for young women, some red meat is important.  People should consult their physicians before making dietary changes.  But, do we need to eat so much meat?  

On average, Americans consume about 5.8 pounds of meat and poultry each week (excluding vegetarians).  Yeah, that's like eating three quarter pound burgers or pulled pork sandwiches per day, every day!  Granted, some of that meat is not eaten, like bones, fat, waste, etc.  But, does a family of four really need over 23 lbs. of meat every week?  If we set a target for our nation to cut back 10%, it would be a step in the right direction.  Those people who want to help heal our planet would gladly chose to eat a bit less meat each week.  

Food and water security, human health, and climate change are interrelated. The Meatless Monday movement encourages people to start their week right by pledging to not eat meat on Mondays.  The idea is to encourage participants to focus on making better choices for health and the environment on Monday so that those ideas can be incorporated the remainder of the week.

To be clear, where we can make a difference, is to get the information out so that people can begin to think about their own family's carbon footprint (vehicle choices, where they buy food and what they are buying, saving energy in their homes and businesses, reducing driving and flying, etc.).  Having done so, I am confident that many fellow Americans will start to make more appropriate choices because it's the right thing to do.

Mr. President, please help save our children from "Hell and High-water".  Speaking of which ...

oh yeah, just say "NO!" to the Keystone XL Pipeline.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Great idea, but unlikely (0+ / 0-)

    I can't imagine Obama taking on big Ag.  He's kind of a friend of theirs.  He can't even be bothered to hire one of those American green tech companies he keeps talking about to support some good jobs installing solar panels on the White House for pete's sake!

    Hay hombres que luchan un dia, y son buenos Hay otros que luchan un año, y son mejores Hay quienes luchan muchos años, y son muy buenos. Pero hay los que luchan toda la vida. Esos son los imprescendibles.

    by Mindful Nature on Sat Feb 16, 2013 at 04:35:49 PM PST

  •  possible improvements (0+ / 0-)

    The direction of this column is good.  But hopefully the author can make some improvements the next time he writes on this topic.  

    The cited 2006 study is not from the UN, but rather from the FAO – whic is just one of 19 UN specialized agencies – and page 236 prescribes more factory farming, not less (p. 236): "The principle means of limiting livestock's impact on the environment must be... intensification."

    The authors of that 2006 FAO study have retracted their comparison between livestock and transport;  see http://www.cjr.org/....

    Those FAO authors’ conflict of interest and lack of qualifications have been exposed by the New York Times at http://bittman.blogs.nytimes.com/...

    World Bank president Jim Kim isn't the best person to cite on this topic - as he has pleaded for cheaper chicken wings;  see http://clippings.ilri.org/...

    The 2012 World Bank report on climate change isn't the best source on this topic - as it warns about a rise in average world temperature of 4 degrees centigrade – whereas PriceWaterhouse Coopers earlier warned of a 6 degree rise;  see http://www.businessgreen.com/...

    The 2012 World Bank report on climate change on page 44 includes a projection for up to 100% more livestock by 2050 – whereas the International Food Policy Research Institute has projected a scenario by which livestock numbers will drop at least through 2030;  see page 6 at http://www.ifpri.org/...

    Perhaps the best case to support this column can be found in last month’s issue of Nature Climate Change (probably the world’s most prestigious climate change journal) at http://www.chompingclimatechange.org/...

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site