Skip to main content

It's capital vrs. labor and guess who has been winning.  Marx, while not a prophet, certainly had some insights that keep getting validated.

The single greatest driver of income inequality over a recent 15 year period was runaway income from capital gains and dividends.
Many know that.  What big thing happened over those 15 years?  Why, of course, taxation on capital gains and dividends was reduced way below taxation on income.  

Work should not be taxed at a higher rate than wealth accumulation.  That is a moral principle.  Even now, capital gains and dividends are taxed at the extremely low rate of 20%, up from the 15% rate in the Bush tax cuts.  Tax them as oridinary income and much of the deficit bs would disappear.

The reforms to capitalism to address impovrishment of workers in the the early to mid-20th century involved progressive taxation, protection of unions, and the growth of a social welfare state.  In Western Europe, especially the UK, and even a greater degree in America, where such reforms were weakest due to the lack of a viable socialist party, starting in the late 70s and accelerating afterward, there was a movement with the aim of increasing inequality (although it often hid its real goals), and that "conservative" movement succeeded.  The Bush tax cuts were its apex.  

How do we know about this fundamental driver of inequlity?  Did I make it up to fit my ideology?  No, we have facts, a new study that was not corporate funded.  

The new study was performed by Thomas Hungerford of the non-partisan Congressional Research Service. Though the study is not a CRS product, Hungerford’s data is widely cited on both sides; he’s an impeccably objective analyst.

Here’s what Hungerford found: The single greatest driver of income inequality over a recent 15 year period was runaway income from capital gains and dividends.

snip

“By far, the largest contributor to increasing income inequality (regardless of income inequality measure) was changes in income from capital gains and dividends,” the report concludes.

Or, as Hungerford put it in an interview with me: “The reason income inequality has been increasing has been the rising income going to the top one percent. Most of that has come in capital gains and dividends.”

In other words, wealthy beneficiaries of low tax rates on capital gains and dividends are doing extremely well — and their runaway wealth is a major driver of income inequality. There’s a lot of that money out there that could be taxed as ordinary income — as Obama and Dems want — as a way to avert the sequester, which could badly damage the economy. Republicans oppose this.

WaPo, The Plum Line, New study badly undermines GOP position on sequester

Greg Sargent sees the impact on the debate of the day, and that's fine, but I think this is a fundamental issue.  This is a fight we will have to fight even after this President.  The economic inequality is still accelerating in the Great Recession (probably due to a rising stock market and a not rising job market with stagnant wages)

It's a long struggle for justice, fairness, and decency, and small reforms help people on the way.  It should be a fundamental principle of Democrats that wealth should at least be taxed at the same rate as work.  We're not there yet within the Dem Party.  Much work to be done, but that is a North Star worth aiming at.      

Originally posted to TomP on Wed Feb 20, 2013 at 10:08 AM PST.

Also republished by Income Inequality Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site