Skip to main content

White ribbon
Surprise! House Republicans have refused to take up the Senate's bipartisan Violence Against Women Act and are instead once again going to vote on a bill that excludes LGBT people and dials back on the Senate's expanded protections for Native American women.

So basically, it's a replay of 2012. Last year, the Senate passed an expanded Violence Against Women Act reauthorization by a bipartisan 68 to 31 margin, while this year, the Senate passed an almost identical bill by 78 to 22. That means a narrow majority of Senate Republicans voted for this bill. Yet House Republicans are, once again, refusing to bring this bipartisan bill up for a vote before replacing it with a weakened, exclusionary version of their own. And weakened and exclusionary it is. Jennifer Bendery reports that:

The House GOP bill entirely leaves out provisions aimed at helping LGBT victims of domestic violence. Specifically, the bill removes "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" from the list of underserved populations who face barriers to accessing victim services, thereby disqualifying LGBT victims from a related grant program. The bill also eliminates "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" from the list of groups who may not be denied funding under VAWA.

Additionally, the bill proposes compromise language aimed at helping Native American victims of violence. Under the Senate bill, tribal courts would gain new authority to prosecute non-Native American men who abuse Native American women on reservations. The House bill also grants that new authority—a major change from their VAWA bill in the last Congress—but adds a caveat that would allow those people to move their case to a federal court if they feel their constitutional rights aren't being upheld.

The provision allowing abusers of Native American women to move to federal court isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but again, the original provision was good enough for 23 out of 45 Republican senators, yet John Boehner won't even let it come to a vote in the House?

As for excluding LGBT victims, heaven forbid Republicans not take an opportunity to exclude LGBT people from any legal protection or right that crosses their path. Keeping victims of domestic violence from having access to services for victims of domestic violence is a great way to emphasize just how completely you reject their relationships, so of course that's going to be a House Republican priority.

This exclusionary House bill needs to be scrapped. Please sign the petition urging House Republicans to pass the Senate version of the expanded, bipartisan Violence Against Women Act.

Originally posted to Laura Clawson on Fri Feb 22, 2013 at 10:49 AM PST.

Also republished by Native American Netroots, Feminism, Pro-Feminism, Womanism: Feminist Issues, Ideas, & Activism, and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site