Skip to main content

It's a rainy Thursday afternoon in springtime South Carolina. Today, school's cut short for a hoard of local teenagers. It's that detestable time of the semester when parents meet teachers for short discussions on just how awesome, or how terrible, the parent's child has been.

For one group of juniors, parents won't show at the allotted conference time. They have work, they don't care, or perhaps they're sure their kids have been doing everything right. But this group doesn't take school seriously. They're much more concerned with other things - girls, games, and most importantly, sports. On this particular Thursday, the group loads up in an old van - four guys and one girl - to patronize the local chicken restaurant across town. And like young people are prone to do, they're out looking for trouble.

If you read the criminal code, you might find that the described group qualifies as a gang. It's a few guys, all organized under a very unoriginal name - The Weekend Warriors. They go out or stay in, sometimes causing trouble and other times just playing a few rounds of Tiger Woods PGA Golf, 2003. Today the gang is looking to raise a bit of hell.

After lunch, they're on their way back to school for baseball practice. They pull up at a red light, idling a few feet away from another driver. That driver is an older lady, and she's driving some incarnation of a mail carrier's vehicle. Her steering wheel is on the right side, and that odd fact is what sets our gang off.

"Look at this woman, driving on the wrong side of the car. What does she think this is, England?"
Just behind the driver's seat sits a guy who'd at one time or another been referred to by his football coach as the the Special Teams Master. He pulls from under the seat something that resembles a semi-automatic weapon. In broad daylight, with dozens of cars in sight, he sticks the gun out of the window. He fires three shots. Red splashes of color splatter the driver's window. Though this man pulled the trigger, the weapon wasn't his. It belonged to another of our gangbangers. The car belonged to yet another. They were all complicit in the crime, even if they hadn't pulled the trigger.
You might be thinking this is a murder story, but you'd be wrong. The red splash was paint, discharged from a powerfully propelled paintball gun. The bullets hadn't struck the woman at all, and the weapon was only semi-automatic in the sense that it fired paint at high frequency. The woman had been startled, and you must have thought - at least for a minute - that the red color was her own blood. Calls from the back of the van accuse our shooter of being an idiot, and the driver's encouraged to gun it through the intersection. Hapless and hopeless criminals, they give the victim enough time to record a license plate number.

A few hours later, our gun owner is sitting at the home of the shooter. The vehicle owner gets a call on his cell phone:

Come home now. The police just called.
The gun owner and the shooter plead with the car owner not to snitch. But that will never work. They always eat lunch together. They're The Weekend Warriors. Our gun owner leaves the home, and he heads to his regularly scheduled haircut. He makes it clear that he'll deny it all. On the way, he dumps the gun in the trashcan of a local convenience store.

He's sitting in the hair chair, a stench of nervousness stretched all across his face. His mother's there, and she's blissfully unaware of the hell that's about to reign down. Her phone rings. The police wants to see them all, and the hairjob's cut short. They head to the local courthouse, their fate hanging in the balance.

In the state of Texas, it's a felony to point a gun at another person. It's also a felony to point an item that reasonably looks like a deadly weapon. This is aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and it carries a penalty range into the decades.

In South Carolina, where the crime took place, a number of laws might apply. Point a firearm at a person is a felony carrying as many as five years. Attempted aggravated assault and battery might also be charged. All told, the act could have netted our gang serious jail time.

When they arrived at the court house, the investigating officer took a hard line. He explained to the suspects that he was a recreational paintball player, and that their actions had threatened the reputation of paintballers everywhere. He then left the young men to wait, as their parents talked through the options. The gang went upstairs, where they even wrote a parody song about the event. A true tribute to how little risk they felt of getting in trouble, their comfort level was measurably high.

The officer called the gang down and gave them quite a scolding. Their parents, dressed in shirts, ties, and dresses, had convinced the officer that, at least for the four males, this was simply a case of boys being boys. They walked without so much as an arrest record. Their punishment included a weekend of restriction during Spring Break, and without my redacted telling of this story, it'd have never reached the public record.

You might have guessed this, but I was one of those gang members. A lily-white, Southern-fried owner of a Wal-Mart paintball gun. My friends were also white. They were all solidly upper middle class though also upper levels of stupid. And the terror we caused that poor old woman was real.

But we walked clean without taking so much as a deferred probation. Our records unencumbered, we were legally able to tell colleges that year that we were much more like choir boys than anything else. Our moment of indiscretion cost us nothing, but that isn't the case for many. For many, that incident would have ended in an arrest at the very least. In most cases, it would have ended in some form of zealous prosecution.

Last week, I had a conversation with a conservative friend about the dynamics of white privilege. He fancies himself a libertarian, but that's convenient cover for a person who receives in his mailbox the Rush Limbaugh magazine. We discussed the ways in which white people have been advantaged in the past and the ways they're advantaged today. My primary contentions to him revolved more around the economics of the matter, because the racial disparities in the criminal justice system make too easy a target.

I have a message for white people - it's alright to admit we've had a leg up. Many of the problems on this planet can be traced to human egoism and the unrelenting need for self-justification. People spend thousands of dollars on toys to make themselves feel worthy, but they do it in other ways, too. And those mental tricks inform many of the political leanings these people hold.

In a society like this one, where a person's perceived worth is at least partly correlated with his net worth, there exists no shortage of individuals looking to defend the origins of their financial success. It makes sense, too. If you believed that the only thing making you worthy was the number on your bank statement, then you might take great pains to prove to others that the money was earned through smarts, or hard work, or something.

You'd want people to know that you have money because you are some form of awesome. There's an insidious flip side to that idea that must be investigated. In order to support the proposition that financial success says something inherently positive about you, you must also believe that some outcome other than financial success says something negative about the other person. When you introduce the idea that factors outside of your own control have influenced your financial outcome, you run the risk of undermining the very thing upon which you've built a personal identity.

From this comes the unwillingness of many white people to recognize the many perks of being white. We tend to forget the most important part of the word capitalism, which is the first seven letters. CAPITAL. That's the chunk of money that you'd need to start a business, buy a home, or pay for school. Those with capital get to lend it out for a fee. Those without it have to do the borrowing, a privilege for which they will pay the fee. It's a system that, at its core, rewards those with money. We provide foundational support for this proposition with a tax structure that rewards wealth holders.

It'd be easy to just note the effects of slavery, whereby "white" America gained piles of capital on the backs of unpaid black workers, providing white Americans with an inherent advantage. But it's continued with policies since then. Most notably, the discrimination in government housing loans and private housing loans up until the 1960s afforded white Americans an opportunity to build equity while black Americans were closed out. A period of inflation in the 1970s caused many assets - including real property - to run up real gains in value. This period of real estate boom benefited those who owned homes, and they were largely able to extend their gains in capital accumulation.

Simply put - we have, in the past and to a lesser extent the present - put into place road blocks that have made it incredibly for black people to acquire the currency by which our economic system runs. As such, we'd established a system of white advantage, where the simple color of one's skin has provided what amounts to around a 20 lap head start in a 100 lap race.

In discussions with my friend, he raised points that I've heard before. What he perceived to be his strongest point rested upon the idea that if we were to provide for affirmative action and other advantages designed to level the playing field, we would be perpetuating racism by angering an entire new class of white people. He supported his theory with a notably obtuse reading of Martin Luther King Jr.'s purpose. My friend quoted Dr. King and offered that true equality only happens when we don't see a person's skin at all.

Unfortunately, his view smacks of the white-centric world view that clouds his thinking. In one thought, he had reduced the Civil Rights movement into an effort designed to appease white people, to change the hearts and minds of us whites because we're just that important.

That wasn't Dr. King's purpose at all, and that must be understood. Dr. King and others understood that prejudice will probably exist in some form as long as the earth is around. And he must have understood that if programs like affirmative action weren't around, at least some white people would find other convenient reasons to be racist. Instead, Dr. King fought to change structures. He and others fought to reconstruct the very fabric of America's opportunity system. He was largely unconcerned with the feelings of individual racists. That is implicated in his very goals. If he believed that individual racism could be eradicated, he might have spent his time lobbying for that. What he understood was the government must be changed precisely because people, left to their own devices, are prone to exploit the exploitable.

My friend is somewhere in the middle class though he considers himself to be a "poor" white person. And his concern, of course, was that some people like himself might get screwed if we institute policies that seek to provide equal opportunity by taking into account the inherent advantages that our racist history has gifted white Americans.

I have a message for him and for other white Americans concerned about that own bit of self-interest: two or more centuries of economic advantage for white people was not gained without much pain and gnashing of teeth. And structural inequality won't be fixed without some pain, either. A broken finger has to be re-broken before it can grow back. And to think that equal opportunity will be achieved without someone getting a short stick is insurmountably naive.

More than that, it's evidence of the very white privilege I wrote about above. His attitude is one of - "sure, it's fine if black people get back a little of that head start we gained, as long as it doesn't hurt any white people."

Being white has its privileges. We have inequitable outcomes for similar acts. We have an entire economic system designed to disadvantage people without capital, knowing well that our history has precluded entire races from accumulating money. And if we're going to do something about it, white people will need to suck it up. When people like my friend bemoan the perils of affirmative action, he should remember the value of white privilege, where lily white thugs can cause wholesale terror and walk away without a scratch.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Regardless of race, I wouldn't have any (5+ / 0-)

    sympathy if anyone that does that gets some harsh punishment.

    •  You may not, but the truth is that (6+ / 0-)

      you are not the cops, you are not the prosecutors.  The real cops, the real prosecutors, real teachers and real principals do this everyday.

      "Empty vessels make the loudest sound, they have the least wit and are the greatest blabbers" Plato

      by Empty Vessel on Mon Feb 25, 2013 at 11:27:48 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  That's fair (12+ / 0-)

      and it's your take.

      But that's beyond the point. The point is that the punishment, especially for crimes of that nature, is largely dependent upon factors other than the act itself. Namely, the race of the offender (and to some extent, his wealth, though my family was anything but rich; there seemed to be a presumption of wealth that allowed my father credibility with the officer).

      Likewise, I think the idea of giving "harsh" punishment for stupid teenagers doing stupid things that ultimately injure no one is a tenuous path. I tend to think the 2nd chance we were afforded should be offered to almost all offenders in situations like ours. It seems as if the system had an understanding that we - the young, white, decent looking type - were allowed the indiscretions of youth without our lives being ruined. Meanwhile, many young guys - black or hispanic - wouldn't be afforded that room to grow. They'd be immediately pegged as "bad" in a way we were not. And they'd be processed in the prison pipeline that takes foolish teenagers and actually turn them into hardened criminal offenders.

      It's likely I wouldn't be writing this diary right now, I wouldn't be working with the poor as a public defender, I wouldn't be working on other good causes, if I was treated the way the system treats "most" similar offenders. Because people - all of them - are complicated in the sense that we do good things, bad things, stupid things, memorable things, and things we'd rather not claim. It just seems that one sub-class of young offenders are allowed to overcome their worst moments to go on to their better moments, while others are defined by their momentary stupidity.

      I'd prefer we have common sense approaches to justice that apply equally to all. But it's most important they apply equally to all (even if they aren't common sense).

      "I believe that, as long as there is plenty, poverty is evil." ~Bobby Kennedy

      by Grizzard on Mon Feb 25, 2013 at 12:14:13 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  And by "second chance" (5+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        CwV, OnlyWords, Tonedevil, Avilyn, Larsstephens

        I'm not sure getting off free is justice. But there's a huge gap between that and "harsh" punishment (i.e. time in prison). Second chance can mean a lot of things, including restitution, community service, pre-trial probation, etc.

        "I believe that, as long as there is plenty, poverty is evil." ~Bobby Kennedy

        by Grizzard on Mon Feb 25, 2013 at 12:27:34 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Would you say the same if a car full of punks ... (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          did the same thing to YOUR mother or any of YOUR other relatives?  That poor woman was undoubtedly a nervous wreck for a LONG time thereafter, if not forever.  Why some teenage boys think cruelty is funny is beyond me, but they clearly do and they SHOULD be punished appropriately.  In your case, why have you not looked into the file and identified the woman you all so casually tortured, contacted her, apologized, and offered some form of meaningful restitution?

          "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

          by Neuroptimalian on Mon Feb 25, 2013 at 01:08:14 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  Yes, I would (6+ / 0-)

            Just like my grandfather stood in front of a 1940s South Carolina jury and asked them not to give the death penalty to the 19-year old black man who shot and killed his father, a white cop.

            It's called not allowing your own personal experiences to make you lose your mind. In fact, I have a provision in my will that specifically advises the court that in the event I'm ever murdered, I don't want the killer put to death.

            We offered, through the police, to cut the woman's lawn, clean her car, and do other assorted tasks for an indeterminate number of months, but she (understandably) wanted no further contact with us.

            Because I am not an asshole, I choose and chose to respect that wish.

            I highly doubt the Florence Police Department keeps 12-year old offense reports for cases where no arrest was made.

            So what would your "appropriate" punishment have been? Felony conviction and the life-altering results that go along with it?  

            "I believe that, as long as there is plenty, poverty is evil." ~Bobby Kennedy

            by Grizzard on Mon Feb 25, 2013 at 01:19:29 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  Well, at least you tried to make it up to her, ... (0+ / 0-)

              which was not at all evident from what you wrote.

              As to appropriate punishment, it should have been whatever the statutes provided for at the time.  That's why we have laws and consequences for breaking them.  If there were extenuating or mitigating circumstances, they would have been taken into account.  But if none, then so be it.

              It's one thing to be against the death penalty but quite another to expect criminal acts which traumatize others (or have other results) to have no consequences whatsoever.

              "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

              by Neuroptimalian on Mon Feb 25, 2013 at 02:57:13 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

          •  And to answer your question (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Empty Vessel, Avilyn

            "Why some teenage boys think cruelty is funny," it's clearly a combination of things. For one, teenage boys don't think about the long-term consequences of their decisions. At least not in the way adults do. I can assure you that at 16, I'd have been largely unable to reflect on the event (even after the fact), they way I'm able to at 27.

            It's one part brain biology, one part life experience. There exists a disconnect with true cause and effect. I'm certain that in my friend's mind, the thought was, "let me shoot this paintball at this car and it will be funny." I can assure you, him not otherwise showing psychopathic tendencies in the decade since, that his thought was not, "I think I will do this thing that will cause this old woman trauma now and in the future."

            That's almost assuredly something that he would think about now.

            There's a reason we hold juveniles to a lower standard of culpability. In the past, we've done so because we had this feeling it was the right thing to do. Lately, we've done so because the science tells us a not fully formed prefrontal cortex leads people to do things they wouldn't do as grown-ups. It's why 16-year olds can't buy pistols. We recognize that in the absence of adult decision-making faculties, a child can do dangerous things he wouldn't otherwise do. That's not to say that harm won't be done with non-deadly weapons, as we clearly demonstrated.

            Of course, that's about 4 miles from the thrust of the diary. I'd encourage you to look past your clearly demonstrated sense of moral outrage against me and my friends (which has been noted for the record, in case there is a moral arbiter out there looking to give you strokes) to the bigger point made in this diary.

            Because this has the potential to be a full-force derail.

            "I believe that, as long as there is plenty, poverty is evil." ~Bobby Kennedy

            by Grizzard on Mon Feb 25, 2013 at 01:33:01 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  I don't think discussing the subject ... (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:

              that half your diary concerned itself with will "derail" it, but having commented upon it, I'll now leave you in order that you may further the discussion you seek.

              "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

              by Neuroptimalian on Mon Feb 25, 2013 at 03:01:01 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

  •  Very well said. nothing to add. nt. (7+ / 0-)

    "Empty vessels make the loudest sound, they have the least wit and are the greatest blabbers" Plato

    by Empty Vessel on Mon Feb 25, 2013 at 11:25:39 AM PST

  •  This Diary Bolsters A Bias Of Mine - (6+ / 0-)

    The most progressive White males are Southern progressive White males.

    Progressive White males who live outside of the Confederacy can often get by "talkin' the talk", but those who live in the Confederacy have to "walk the walk". And for many Southern progressive White males, they're often walking on fire...

    I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of the Republican Party.

    by OnlyWords on Mon Feb 25, 2013 at 12:39:47 PM PST

    •  Yes I've noticed this (3+ / 0-)

      The most active and passionate white male and even female progressives I know are all from the South or have lived there for a while, like me. Most of the white people I know who have never lived in the South are much more apathetic, particularly when it comes to race issues.

      Time is of no account with great thoughts, which are as fresh to-day as when they first passed through their authors' minds ages ago. - Samuel Smiles

      by moviemeister76 on Mon Feb 25, 2013 at 12:47:01 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site